Return to the CurtPalme.com main site CurtPalme.com Home Theater Forum
A forum with a sense of fun and community for Home Theater enthusiasts!
Products for Sale ] [ FAQ: Hooking it all up ] [ CRT Primer/FAQ ] [ Best/Worst CRT Projectors List ] [ Setup Tips & Manuals ] [ Advanced Procedures ] [ Newsletter ]
 
Blu-ray disc release list and must-have titles. Buy the latest and best Blu-ray titles to show off in your home theater!

 As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! 

Poor mans lens flapping to Barco 1200/1209

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors
Author Message
Ile



Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 1491
Location: Jyväskylä, Finland

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 5:27 pm    Post subject: Poor mans lens flapping to Barco 1200/1209

These projectors don't have lens flapping (bellows) and LC hardwares are glued to tubes equally (almost) in factory, they used 1.3-1.5 mm thick leaky rtv seam.

I have LC hardwares removed from my tubes and I'm wondering should I glue them back so I take calculated Scheimpflug corrections into consideration. That would give more even focus and fine adjustment could be done adding thin washers under lens.

Here is my calculated rtv seam thicknesses to tube corners in mm, these are calculated for 2 m wide picture and 10.5 projection angle.

1.0 1.7
[R]
2.6 3.3

1.0 1.0
[G]
2.6 2.6

1.7 1.0
[B]
3.3 2.6

Bottom corners are going to have pretty thick rtv seam, I hope those last. Shocked

Anybody tested this?
Back to top
Joust



Joined: 05 May 2006
Posts: 2429
Location: Almonte, Ontario, Canada

TV/Projector: Marquee 8501LC

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 9:26 pm    Post subject:

sounds logical.
if it doesn't work its just a lot of RTV cutting and try again so it not much of a gamble.
go for it.
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
Ile



Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 1491
Location: Jyväskylä, Finland

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 6:26 pm    Post subject: Re: Poor mans lens flapping to Barco 1200/1209

Ile wrote:
Here is my calculated rtv seam thicknesses to tube corners in mm, these are calculated for 2 m wide picture and 10.5 projection angle.

1.0 1.7
[R]
2.6 3.3

1.0 1.0
[G]
2.6 2.6

1.7 1.0
[B]
3.3 2.6

Yesterday I made 3x3 mm plastic peaces (above thicknesses) and glued those to each corner of the tube, using rtv. Today I glued tubes to LC hardwares.
Back to top
lucht
Guest






Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:14 pm    Post subject: Re: Poor mans lens flapping to Barco 1200/1209

Hi Ile,

How do you calculate these schiempflug corrections, because inside the PT18-244 LC housings there are 4 small plastic distance holders which I can use.

I am converting my both BD808s with 120 Mhz RGB amps in LC Versions with PT18-244 with fixed LC-Housing and HD18 Lens. Similar to the modification from Chuchuf, only with LC-Housings without Schiempflug http://archive2.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?p=7554772

I will also convert one of my BD801s to LC mit 07MPSA and HD117.24 lens

Thanks
Wil
Back to top
Ile



Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 1491
Location: Jyväskylä, Finland

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:50 pm    Post subject:

I made small plastic spacers and glued those to tube.

Barco lens software calculates needed vertical and horizontal Sheimpflug (mm and angle) to text sheet.
Just input correct AR, projection angle and -distance...

http://www.dvdplaza.fi/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3801&d=1095853469

Using angle and precise tube face dimensions might give more accurate results than those mm values. I believe those mm readings are calculated for lens screw positions that might be little different what tube corners.

Then you can do fine tuning using thin washers or o-rings between c element assembly and lens.
Back to top
r.bauer



Joined: 08 Apr 2006
Posts: 280
Location: The Netherlands

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:58 pm    Post subject:

The tubes in a standard 1200, 1209 or 1209/2 already have a 'fixed' amount of scheimpflug correction when they leave the factory. I have set up many of these projectors mostly on 2.4m wide screens, and all of them had perfect corner focus in all 4 corners. I assume that the factory fiexed scheimpflug correction is for this screen size.

Did you really have such a bad corner focus, or did you use non-standard scheimpflug correction tubes from a simulator?

But good job for trying Thumbs Up
Back to top
lucht
Guest






Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 5:19 pm    Post subject:

Ile wrote:
I made small plastic spacers and glued those to tube.

Barco lens software calculates needed vertical and horizontal Sheimpflug (mm and angle) to text sheet.
Just input correct AR, projection angle and -distance...

http://www.dvdplaza.fi/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3801&d=1095853469

Using angle and precise tube face dimensions might give more accurate results than those mm values. I believe those mm readings are calculated for lens screw positions that might be little different what tube corners.

Then you can do fine tuning using thin washers or o-rings between c element assembly and lens.



Ahaa so, you recalcutate the 0,62 degree Vert. back from the screws to the corners of the tube, that explain the 1,6 mm in place from the 2,5 mm.

Thanks
Wil
Back to top
Ile



Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 1491
Location: Jyväskylä, Finland

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 8:23 pm    Post subject:

r.bauer wrote:
The tubes in a standard 1200, 1209 or 1209/2 already have a 'fixed' amount of scheimpflug correction when they leave the factory. I have set up many of these projectors mostly on 2.4m wide screens, and all of them had perfect corner focus in all 4 corners. I assume that the factory fiexed scheimpflug correction is for this screen size.

Did you really have such a bad corner focus, or did you use non-standard scheimpflug correction tubes from a simulator?

But good job for trying Thumbs Up
You are right, there was 1.4-1.9 mm vertical sheimpflug from factory in all tubes. Horizontal sheimpflug 0.2-0.5 mm was to wrong direction in red/blue and also green had it some amount. That indicates that they didn't try to corrected horizontal direction at all. That makes sense, because that would mean three different glueing jig.

I had to remove tubes from hardwares, because glycol leaks and red tube need to be chanced. So I wanted to glue those back as good as possible.
Back to top
Ile



Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 1491
Location: Jyväskylä, Finland

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 8:55 pm    Post subject:

lucht wrote:
Ahaa so, you recalcutate the 0,62 degree Vert. back from the screws to the corners of the tube,

Kind of.

tan (vertical lens software angle) x tubes front plate height = bottom corners corrections

tan (horizontal lens software angle) x tubes front plate width = red/blue inner corners corrections

Formulas give corrections to tube edges. Then ad 1 mm to all corners to get glue also to top edge.
So red/blue inner bottom corners have both corrections + 1 mm...

But those lens software mm readings should be pretty close. If I remember right there was only about 0.1-0.2 mm difference between those two methods. Very Happy

lucht wrote:
that explain the 1,6 mm in place from the 2,5 mm.

Thanks
Wil
No.

That picture is for other pj and other purpose. I just wanted to show where you find those readings and how those correlate to tube edges...
Back to top
lucht
Guest






Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:04 pm    Post subject:

Ile wrote:
lucht wrote:
Ahaa so, you recalcutate the 0,62 degree Vert. back from the screws to the corners of the tube,

Kind of.

tan (vertical lens software angle) x tubes front plate height = bottom corners corrections

tan (horizontal lens software angle) x tubes front plate width = red/blue inner corners corrections

Formulas give corrections to tube edges. Then ad 1 mm to all corners to get glue also to top edge.
So red/blue inner bottom corners have both corrections + 1 mm...

But those lens software mm readings should be pretty close. If I remember right there was only about 0.1-0.2 mm difference between those two methods. Very Happy

lucht wrote:
that explain the 1,6 mm in place from the 2,5 mm.

Thanks
Wil
No.

That picture is for other pj and other purpose. I just wanted to show where you find those readings and how those correlate to tube edges...


I did not used the values from the picture, I used these for a BG1209, because I have no data from a 1200 to see if I could understand how you calculated the posted values for your CRT.

In my case I need no additional 1 mm, because inside the PT18-244 LC-housing are plastic distanceholder which I can replace by home made ones with the specific length. I have several sets of tubes to re-glue because I buyed them the last months with a glycol leakage for my CRT´s.

But I am search for one more set LC housings (PT18), for my last BD808s (AC)
Back to top
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum