| Author |
Message |
stefuel
Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 3353 Location: Green Harbor MA USA
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:04 am Post subject: Fios contract up shortly. What next? |
|
|
I no longer have any loyalty to any one provider. I was a long time Directv customer till they porked me. Fios seemed like a good deal but as they started adding new HD channels (non premium) they wanted more money to view them. I've got two months to decide who gets my money this time around. I guess the only choices are,
Fios
Comcast
Directv
Dish
Open for suggestions.
_________________ Chip
A Barco is only a AmPro with training wheels
Card carrying member of the AVS chain gang.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HaydnG90
Joined: 22 May 2006 Posts: 1356
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm in a similar situation. Was a long time D-tv customer but switched to FIOS when the neighborhood was connected, mainly because it promised slightly better quality and reliability, was cheaper (back then) and was rolling out HDTV channels at a faster rate than the satellite provider.
I now hear that my TV service is going up >10% in price so I've been looking at alternatives. I've hated the DVR system and the crappy Motorola FIOS box that crashes on a regular basis, from Day 1. I was spoiled by the superior Sony T60 TIVO unit I was using with D-tv. I have grudgingly lived with its deficiencies for the reasons listed.
I've thought about going back to D-tv but am changing my mind because 1) they make you sign up for a 2 year contract. When you average out costs FIOS still remains the cheaper option by approx $20/month with the services I need (extended basic channels plus HDTV access) 2) D-tv no longer has a relationship with TIVO and their standard DVR service sucks as much as the FIOS based system. There is discussion that TIVO will re-enter with a HD D-TV solution in the near future. This was supposed to be here by end of 09, but has been pushed back until 2010....so who knows.
At this point I'm going to hold off and stay with FIOS, at least until TIVO becomes a reality.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emdawgz1
Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 7949
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Comcast has bought our City Council and Senator Specter... so no Fios in the city of Phila
_________________ Follow my blog
www.thesinglebrother.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dturco
Joined: 06 Feb 2009 Posts: 3778 Location: Eastern Shore Maryland
TV/Projector: Runco DLP VX-3000i Marquee 9500 parts doner
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| emdawgz1 wrote: | Comcast has bought our City Council and Senator Specter... so no Fios in the city of Phila  |
Are you suggesting the City of Brotherly Love would be on the" TAKE"
I can't prove a thing but when I lived there I wanted to build a small sub-division in East Torresdale where it just so happened City Council Persons Joan Krajewski's office manager lived on the street with access to my parcel. The subdivision rules for Phila. allowed for 20 row homes to be built on the land. My partner and I submitted for 7 single family homes of which he was going to live in 1 and I was going to live in 1 and we were going to sell the other 5. This was 8 years ago and at that time the houses would have sold for $275,00 and up. The city was actively seeking new construction and offering a tax abatement for 10 years for new homes at the time.
I never did get it approved but after I was forced to abandon my plans and in disgust moved from Phila, low and behold a contributor to the city councils coffers was able to build exactly what I had propose 3 years early.
Can't prove a thing.
But things that make you go HMMM.
_________________ Firefly rules. Can't stop the signal.
http://www.hulu.com/firefly
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emdawgz1
Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 7949
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not suggesting... I'm saying it. Why was Phila the last of the major markets to get Cable tv?
City council. Why was Comcast able to buy out all the other players? City Council.
Phila city council is TOTALLY CORRUPT!
_________________ Follow my blog
www.thesinglebrother.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dturco
Joined: 06 Feb 2009 Posts: 3778 Location: Eastern Shore Maryland
TV/Projector: Runco DLP VX-3000i Marquee 9500 parts doner
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| emdawgz1 wrote: | I'm not suggesting... I'm saying it. Why was Phila the last of the major markets to get Cable tv?
City council. Why was Comcast able to buy out all the other players? City Council.
Phila city council is TOTALLY CORRUPT! |
Yeah I agree. I just couldn't "Prove it" in my case so I left the City.
_________________ Firefly rules. Can't stop the signal.
http://www.hulu.com/firefly
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| HaydnG90 wrote: | | I've thought about going back to D-tv but am changing my mind because 1) they make you sign up for a 2 year contract. When you average out costs FIOS still remains the cheaper option by approx $20/month with the services I need (extended basic channels plus HDTV access) 2) D-tv no longer has a relationship with TIVO and their standard DVR service sucks as much as the FIOS based system. |
Good call... Just stay where you are for right now. From everything I've read, PQ is better with FiOS. That's one big advantage right there. Not sure if that situation still exists or not. I just know that DirecTV looks great on a 40-50" flat panel. A 110" diag front projection setup? Ehhhh... Not so much.
I am surprised there's that much of a cost advantage with FiOS. My local cable provider offers far inferior hardware to DirecTV's, and the prices are no better.
As for the the newer DirecTV hardware, it's certainly no Tivo, but it's actually pretty decent. The old HR10-250's were nothing to write home about, either. Those things were SLOW. Since HD came along, nothing is like the great Sony SAT receivers we had back in the 90's.
One thing I actually like about the new DirecTV hardware is the ethernet jacks and the coming multi-room viewing. That way, I can have say, two DVR's in the house, but watch the material on those two DVR's in any of four different rooms. That's supposedly in beta testers' hands now. Can't wait for it to roll out to general release.
Oh, and I don't mind the 2-year commitment - I've got nowhere to go, anyway. I can wait a few months if something great comes a long (yeah, right).
Seems they all suck in way or another. It's all a trade-off, and just picking the one that sucks least.
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emdawgz1
Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 7949
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I like my dishnet service. I love my dvr . I just feel the pricing is a little steep for the hd tiers....
_________________ Follow my blog
www.thesinglebrother.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kiev Savoie
Joined: 25 Oct 2007 Posts: 432
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My town is actually rolling out a Fiber to the Home service through our Utilities system for internet,TV and phone service (one of the first in the US to do so). When this idea was initially offered, the town took a vote on it after a strong grass-roots campaign which passed by 67% if memory serves me. Cox Cable and Bellsouth immediately sued with Anti-trust claims and held everything up for three years... after a public vote! They finally lost, but managed to buy themselves enough time to develop services that could compete with what Lafayette Utilities Service is offering. I hear that Cox has been pouring money into aggressive upgrades of it's Lafayette parish network while all but ignoring the rest of the state! Bastards!
http://lafayetteprofiber.com/OnBackground/FUD.html
Here are a few details of pricing for some of the services offered:
TV:
The highest tier of video service is just under $60 and includes DVR service with 250+ channels including about 40 HD channels.
In addition you can opt for Premium Movies Suites as well:
HBO $12.81
Cinemax $6.08
Showtime $8.47
Starz!/Encore $7.43
Internet-
Fast-10 Mbps (Download AND Upload)-$28.95
Turbo-30 Mbps (Download AND Upload)-$44.95
Extreme-50 Mbps (Download AND Upload)-$57.95
All Internet Services Include:
*** Access to the 100 Mbps Peer-to-Peer Community Intranet *** (emphasis mine)
*** Direct Ethernet connection (no modem needed) ***
Up to 7 email accounts with 2 GB storage each
Webmail access that includes personal calendaring, IM capabilities, and file sharing
Personal web space up to 70 MB
Security suite that includes virus protection, spam filter, pop-up blocker and more
And they have bundles that bring the cost down slightly if you want all three services.
I have heard varying stories about the quality of service from people in the areas it was first turned on, but what do you guys think about the pricing? does it sound fair?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stefuel
Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 3353 Location: Green Harbor MA USA
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I never would have left D-tv had they played fair. I was a loyal customer from day one. I bought, paid for and istalled all my own equipment. When they launched the new HD equipment into space I discovered that I would not be able to recieve it. I was paying for the full HD package and only getting half of the programming. They told me I would have to buy new equipment. I really got pissed when they told me that I would have to cough up almost $600.00 for it and when I read the fine print, they still owned it. F U. I told them give me the equipment or watch me walk. I guess they thought I was kidding. Two days later, I had Fios installed and cancelled my D-tv acct. Two weeks later they offered to put up the new dish and provide new reciever at no charge. To late. I was under contract with Fios.
_________________ Chip
A Barco is only a AmPro with training wheels
Card carrying member of the AVS chain gang.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
secstate
Joined: 20 Mar 2006 Posts: 720
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 12:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Kiev Savoie wrote: |
Fast-10 Mbps (Download AND Upload)-$28.95
Turbo-30 Mbps (Download AND Upload)-$44.95
Extreme-50 Mbps (Download AND Upload)-$57.95
All Internet Services Include:
*** Access to the 100 Mbps Peer-to-Peer Community Intranet *** (emphasis mine)
*** Direct Ethernet connection (no modem needed) ***
Up to 7 email accounts with 2 GB storage each
Webmail access that includes personal calendaring, IM capabilities, and file sharing
Personal web space up to 70 MB
Security suite that includes virus protection, spam filter, pop-up blocker and more
And they have bundles that bring the cost down slightly if you want all three services.
I have heard varying stories about the quality of service from people in the areas it was first turned on, but what do you guys think about the pricing? does it sound fair? |
The internet side seems similar to FIOS but a bit cheaper and faster (IF they actually meet the speeds they claim). I personally don't see much advantage in the p2p community internet unless you want to share stuff with your neighbors. Perhaps offsite backup of you data with a friend. You can get a direct Ethernet connection with FIOS as I have one. I will give FIOS this, it is ROCK solid, the internet portion at least for me. I telework 2-3 days a week and wife does so 100% and we have not had an outage once that I have seen. Also in my experience FIOS always meets the bandwidth they say they are giving you. I max out my 25 Mbs pipe a lot and I always get what I am supposed to be getting any time day or night. Cannot comment on the TV portion of FIOS as I don't have it. Never had cable/sat and never will. I just don't watch that much TV. But to answer your question if the service is reliable and it meets its claimed bandwidth it is a pretty sweet deal.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kiev Savoie
Joined: 25 Oct 2007 Posts: 432
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
That's what i thought. My only concern is reliability issues while they iron out all the kinks
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HaydnG90
Joined: 22 May 2006 Posts: 1356
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
+1 on FIOS internet service reliability. I think I've had only one 1hr period of downtime in over 2 years of service.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
picree
Joined: 31 Mar 2006 Posts: 351 Location: Johnson City, TN
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 10:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| emdawgz1 wrote: | I'm not suggesting... I'm saying it. Why was Phila the last of the major markets to get Cable tv?
City council. Why was Comcast able to buy out all the other players? City Council.
Phila city council is TOTALLY CORRUPT! |
Didn't you mean "Filthadelphia"?
_________________ MAIN THEATER: (JVC RS2000; Yamaha UDP-LX500; Yamaha RX-V2400; Lumagen Radiance Pro, Vertex)
SECOND WII-ATER: (BG808; WII; Oppo 971H; Moome external box; BG-DVI transcoder; tse gamma box; Extron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emdawgz1
Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 7949
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kiev Savoie wrote: | My town is actually rolling out a Fiber to the Home service through our Utilities system for internet,TV and phone service (one of the first in the US to do so). When this idea was initially offered, the town took a vote on it after a strong grass-roots campaign which passed by 67% if memory serves me. Cox Cable and Bellsouth immediately sued with Anti-trust claims and held everything up for three years... after a public vote! They finally lost, but managed to buy themselves enough time to develop services that could compete with what Lafayette Utilities Service is offering. I hear that Cox has been pouring money into aggressive upgrades of it's Lafayette parish network while all but ignoring the rest of the state! Bastards!
http://lafayetteprofiber.com/OnBackground/FUD.html
|
So you mean a PUBLIC OPTION forced a private company to improve to remain competitive????
Amazing!!
_________________ Follow my blog
www.thesinglebrother.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Spanky Ham
Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 5643 Location: Comedy Central
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Chip,
I was with directv for four years and was going to stick with them. When I left, they allowed me to suspend my service. I ended up keeping it suspended for a year. When I went to do another six month suspension, they said I would have to reactivate or quit. I said quit, as I didn't have a place to install it. Well, they had re-upped me for the Sunday Ticket and nailed me for a months worth of service on that. I think it was around $100 in the end. Fortunately, I had a HD receiver and a regular receiver that I sold on ebay. I got most of it back and I kept the Tivo receiver with a bunch of movies I had recorded. It will take a lot for me to return to them.
In looking at your options, how much cable programming do you watch and what channels? I know a lot of people who are going with OTA and Netflix.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
csamos
Joined: 10 Jul 2008 Posts: 59 Location: Austin, TX
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 2:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've had DirecTV since they just about started, but I've evaluated Dish Network and the local cable providers (Time Warner and Suddenlink) side-by-side over the years. Cable is by far the worst quality. I had a free month of TW's digital HD package, and I was convinced the signal was bad since the picture was so much worse than DTV, but a cable tech came to the house and determined there was nothing wrong with the signal. When I showed him the comparison, he just shrugged and said that's the best cable can do.
I prefer DTV or Dish mostly because of DTV's DVR service. I can't stand Dish's DVR. It's slow and the interface is ugly and not as intuitive. I resisted moving from Tivo to the latest DTV DVR, but I actually like their DVR better than Tivo. I think they looked at what Tivo did well and copied it, then added more functionality beyond it. I have 3 HR20-700s.
I watch nearly everything in HD, very little SD content. On my 64" Pioneer Elite PRO-730HD, the picture looks fantastic for the most part. I also watch some HD shows in my theater (Marquee 8500 and 110" 16:9 screen), and it also looks fantastic. Obviously with any service, the quality will depend on the content. I watch Survivor, the CSI shows, programs on Discovery and some live sports in the theater, and they all look great. SD content is pretty unwatchable on both, but I rarely do that anyway.
-Carl
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Carl, do you watch Blu-ray? DirecTV looks pretty good until you compare it to Blu-ray. If BD is a 10 on my setup, then DirecTV is a 6, OTA is maybe a 7, and scaled SD DVD... a 2.
I'm not as crazy about the new DVR's as you are, either... I have HR22's, and I think they're really sluggish... Not the menus like the old HR10-250's were (those were heinous, slowly scrolling lists..), but the responsiveness. Like, you're watching live TV, and you press the "LIST" button, and it takes a good second or two just to update the display... It's the first feedback you get that you even pressed the button. That, I really dislike. I definitely liked the TIVO-based machines better.
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
csamos
Joined: 10 Jul 2008 Posts: 59 Location: Austin, TX
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ecrabb wrote: | Carl, do you watch Blu-ray? DirecTV looks pretty good until you compare it to Blu-ray. If BD is a 10 on my setup, then DirecTV is a 6, OTA is maybe a 7, and scaled SD DVD... a 2.
I'm not as crazy about the new DVR's as you are, either... I have HR22's, and I think they're really sluggish... Not the menus like the old HR10-250's were (those were heinous, slowly scrolling lists..), but the responsiveness. Like, you're watching live TV, and you press the "LIST" button, and it takes a good second or two just to update the display... It's the first feedback you get that you even pressed the button. That, I really dislike. I definitely liked the TIVO-based machines better.
SC |
Yes, I watch Blu-ray on both devices, and of course that looks by far the best. I've done some back and forth comparison of the same content via OTA and DTV, and I really couldn't see much difference, even on the 110" screen in the theater where I thought for sure it would show. I'd probably rate them both an 8 for the content I watch. I don't think DTV is only 60% as good as Blu-ray, especially when watching content on Discovery or live sports.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WanMan
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 10270
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 12:14 am Post subject: Re: Fios contract up shortly. What next? |
|
|
| stefuel wrote: | I no longer have any loyalty to any one provider. I was a long time Directv customer till they porked me. Fios seemed like a good deal but as they started adding new HD channels (non premium) they wanted more money to view them. I've got two months to decide who gets my money this time around. I guess the only choices are,
Fios
Comcast
Directv
Dish
Open for suggestions. | Content providers are like cellular companies. Not one is better than the rest and they all equally suck.
_________________ Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|