|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
perisoft
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 2920 Location: Ithaca, NY
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 1:50 am Post subject: Center channel options |
|
|
I'm in the final stages of finishing my HT (when I don't feel embarrassed pics will follow) and am trying to streamline things.
I've got an electric rolldown screen - partially because it was free, and partially because there's a door to our downstairs patio behind it. So I want to keep access. The screen is nice in that regard, but the center channel speaker - which is now a two-way cerwin vega - has to be moved around to get access to the door, which is obnoxious.
What I'd -like- to do is hang a center channel speaker on the screen. Yes, this is far from optimal - I have two HUGE cerwin vegas as mains, and the center should be the same... but space and practicality mean that ain't gonna happen.
The questions are thus:
1) How much weight can I ask an 84" wide Stewart electric roll down screen to support? The screen itself is pretty damn heavy, and the motor is heavily geared (and is probably the same one used for much bigger screens) so I figure it shouldn't be an issue. But I'm not completely sure.
2) I only have 5.5" of clearance between the bottom of the screen when retracted, and the top of the door - which, naturally, swings out under the screen. Is it remotely possible to get a reasonable quality / cost speaker in that form factor?
Any advice is appreciated!
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zaphod
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 2002 Location: Cloverdale
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 5:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
well, a phantom center might work .... i would never try to hang a center from the screen.
some of the Martin Logan speakers are that slim, that is what i am most familiar with.
i do remember that one of the owners of ML had a suspended center channel, but it was on pipes/rods/tubes that hung in front of the screen - brrrr.
have you considered putting the center on a trolley and wheeling it into a marked position before the movie?
_________________ walk gently. leave a good impression.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WTS
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 1276 Location: Calgary
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WHy even bother with a center channel, I think they sound wrong! Get a 2 speaker system that images properly and don't worry about it
_________________ Thanks
Walter
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
perisoft
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 2920 Location: Ithaca, NY
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| zaphod wrote: | | well, a phantom center might work .... i would never try to hang a center from the screen. |
For any specific reason, or just because it gives you the willies? Assuming it's balanced well and the screen can handle the weight (which, as I said, it seems like it ought to be able to) I don't see a huge problem...?
| Quote: |
some of the Martin Logan speakers are that slim, that is what i am most familiar with.
|
Yeah, I don't think that's gonna happen. Would probably cost three times as much as my whole HT for the center speaker!
| Quote: |
i do remember that one of the owners of ML had a suspended center channel, but it was on pipes/rods/tubes that hung in front of the screen - brrrr.
have you considered putting the center on a trolley and wheeling it into a marked position before the movie? |
Yeah, that's the default option. But it's incredibly inelegant, and we play in that room with our son, too, which means that speaker on floor + wire with enough slack to move speaker = bad news. So keeping it out of the way is a big plus.
Another option for me is to take a big stack (say, 8) of the small logitech speakers we have kicking around from our sim work, package them, and run them off my center channel amp (2x stereo outputs). I've got 16-band EQ on the thing and a spectrum analyser, so I can make the curve whatever I want... Hmm.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zaphod
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 2002 Location: Cloverdale
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
further to what Walter said, before i had a ML center, i had a friend over who happened by the news playing on a TV between a pair of ML mains. he was convinced that the sound was coming from the TV, until i explained that it was just a phantom center setup. so, like walter said, you can do it without the center.
ML centers usually run about a grand in the used market, but there are other thin wide centers out there as well - i'm just familiar with the ML line.
as for the willies - well, i'd be afraid of both tearing the screen from the weight and the pendulum effect of the weight at the end of the screen.
_________________ walk gently. leave a good impression.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
perisoft
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 2920 Location: Ithaca, NY
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, not twice what I've spent on the whole HT, but pretty close. I'm running a super-low-buck effort here - pretty much everything I have I got for free or next to nothing through sheer force of will, kinda.
I'm not sure the Vegas I'm using can image well enough for a phantom center like you describe. I have a pair of Wharfedales I use in the living room upstairs that are probably good enough, and I suppose I could move those downstairs and run them alongside the Vegas, but I hate to lose them for regular music listening up here - they're pretty gorgeous. I could always drop back to something else up here, I guess, if I were convinced it could sound good to add the Wharfedales to the Vegas in the HT (I don't want to get rid of the Vegas; they have insane low frequency response and I route a big chunk of LFE to them; the Wharfedales can't even come close in that regard).
Hmm... Something to consider, I guess. It wouldn't be massively hard to spend an evening trying it out.
Anyone else want to chime in on the phantom center idea? I can't recall hearing about it before, and I presume there's a reason everyone uses a physical center channel... but everyone doing something is hardly the final word on whether it's worthwhile to do!
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
perisoft
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 2920 Location: Ithaca, NY
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| perisoft wrote: | | I'm not sure the Vegas I'm using can image well enough for a phantom center |
Oh, whoooah boy. I just went down and did some A/B on the opening music from Wall-E (which is actually from Hello Dolly, but anyway). It's a very distinct vocal center with music R/L, so it's a good test. Anyway, I swapped back and forth using AC3filter to direct the center channel audio either to the center, or to the R/L and not the center.
It was absolute night and day. In direct comparison, the center directed R/L was horribly indistinct and muddy - and I'm no idiot audiophile ranting for pages about air and lightness and all that crap. It just sounded like sh*t.
So, three conclusions:
1) Phantom center with Vegas and the room treatment as-is is a no-go
2) Whenever anybody mixes something using R/L to feel like it's in the center, it's horribly muddy on my current setup
3) It's so freakin' bad that I suspect the acoustics rather than the speakers
The room is pretty bad acoustically right now - it's 14' deep, 12'6" wide, just a box. The right and left walls are fabric covered, and there's a bookshelf on the left, but aside from that, not so good. The screen is about 2' from the front of the room, and the couch is about 1.5' from the back, so the distance from screen to viewer is about the same as the distance from front left to front right speaker.
The worst bit is that there's a cement chimney, untreated, right behind the couch - yay, high frequency reflections! The plan is to hang some curtains along that back wall to damp the reflections, but right now it's probably bad. And it seems to me that that could account for some of the muddiness with the phantom center - I remember the Wharfedales having distinctly superior imaging vs. the Vegas when I auditioned them upstairs (in a room with very good acoustics) but I don't remember the Vegas being that BAD.
Hmm...
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zaphod
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 2002 Location: Cloverdale
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 4:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
what are you useing for your processor?
_________________ walk gently. leave a good impression.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
perisoft
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 2920 Location: Ithaca, NY
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AC3Filter in Media Player Classic, to analog outputs and separate receivers - 1 for R/L, 1 for C, several for various subs, 1 for surrounds.
The center amp is run through a 16-band EQ.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dturco
Joined: 06 Feb 2009 Posts: 3778 Location: Eastern Shore Maryland
TV/Projector: Runco DLP VX-3000i Marquee 9500 parts doner
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Forget using the screen for the mounting. Use the ceiling, this will give you more room for a bigger speaker. Take a piece of 3/4" inch plywood screw it into the ceiling joists with 3" screws then attach a bracket or channel to the plywood and screw into the speaker back side to support . This assumes you don't mind putting screws in you speaker, and that there is enough room to clear you door when open, and the reflective sound from the ceiling won't be to bothersome. Of course that last part is unavoidable with your space restrictions.
_________________ Firefly rules. Can't stop the signal.
http://www.hulu.com/firefly
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CRT_Ben
Joined: 28 Aug 2006 Posts: 1684 Location: Northern Virginia
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Given that any decent speaker will be heavy (even with small woofers you need a dense cabinet to damp the vibrations), probably in the range of 10-15 pounds minimum, I'd be afraid that the screen fabric and/or roller frame wouldn't be able to hold that much, or that it might become damaged over time (not to mention the strain on the electric motor and possibly plastic gears). Having just taken apart a Da-lite roll down screen to convert for flat use, I just wouldn't trust it. Especially that you're going to be walking under this thing, it might drop on somebody's head.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zaphod
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 2002 Location: Cloverdale
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 2:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dturco probably has the best idea. if you mount a center on the ceiling infront of the screen housing, that should give you lots of room. you have about 10" to 12" between the ceiling and the top of the door at least - right? you might have to shift the image down if the top of your image is higher than that.
_________________ walk gently. leave a good impression.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
perisoft
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 2920 Location: Ithaca, NY
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| zaphod wrote: | | dturco probably has the best idea. if you mount a center on the ceiling infront of the screen housing, that should give you lots of room. you have about 10" to 12" between the ceiling and the top of the door at least - right? you might have to shift the image down if the top of your image is higher than that. |
Yeah, I have that much room - but the problem isn't that the image is too far up, but that it's too far down. When the screen is down, the bottom of the image is only about 18" from the floor - and it's an 84" wide screen, so the TOP of the image is about 65" up. If I put the center on the ceiling, I have to have it right at the top to clear the door - and means the center of the speaker would be 26" from the TOP of the screen (the screen's black masked to 16:9, and rolls down so there's a big black area at the top - presumably it was a custom job).
And because of the relatively short viewing distance, I'd then have the voices coming from the sky, like there's someone in heaven lipsyncing badly for the actors...
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dturco
Joined: 06 Feb 2009 Posts: 3778 Location: Eastern Shore Maryland
TV/Projector: Runco DLP VX-3000i Marquee 9500 parts doner
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
O.K. then use the plywood on the ceiling then use meatal rods or bands to lower the speaker to the lowest spot you can. Or build a shelf, down from the ceiling built like a soffit in a kitchen above the cabinets.
_________________ Firefly rules. Can't stop the signal.
http://www.hulu.com/firefly
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zaphod
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 2002 Location: Cloverdale
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 2:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| perisoft wrote: |
And because of the relatively short viewing distance, I'd then have the voices coming from the sky, like there's someone in heaven lipsyncing badly for the actors...  |
There are those on this formum that disagree with me, but if you angle the center downwards you can move the image of where the sound comes from. it's like putting the center on the floor and aiming it up so that the sound doesn't sound like it comes from below the screen. unless you have a permeated screen and the speaker behind it, you're in one situation or the other.
so, build a shelf, and set it so that you can angle it up/down. put a lip on the front of it so that the speaker does not slide off
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|