|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
stefuel
Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 3353 Location: Green Harbor MA USA
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:19 am Post subject: Is a scaler a thing of the past |
|
|
With everything now being displayed natively, and sound processors providing HDMI switching, is there any reason to keep a scaler in the mix? The HD-DVD and BD players do a great job of up-scaling sd dvd's. It seems to me that scalers are quickly becoming ballast.
_________________ Chip
A Barco is only a AmPro with training wheels
Card carrying member of the AVS chain gang.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
goku_mars
Joined: 15 Feb 2008 Posts: 11
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
don't be too sure. The next series of tv's with 4000 by 2000 resolution would benefit from a scaler or line doubler or something along those lines.
They are past prototypes for 4k now.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stefuel
Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 3353 Location: Green Harbor MA USA
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And just what scaler does that resolution, not to mention who's crt projector can do it.
_________________ Chip
A Barco is only a AmPro with training wheels
Card carrying member of the AVS chain gang.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phil Smith
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 7717
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Those TVs will have built-in scalers, otherwise they wouldn't be able to display normal video material.
Upping the refresh rate is still a useful function of a scaler for CRT. I was eventually going to buy a scaler for that purpose.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Axatax
Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Posts: 403
TV/Projector: Sony VPH-G70Q (aka Barco Cine8 Onyx)
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Sure, most modern source equipment can "scale" video. What these types of arguments fail to address are all the functions beside *scaling* that a stand-alone video *processor* provide. I can't recall any stand-alone device manufactured in the past five years that is "just" a scaler, unless you consider something that does 480i/P conversion a scaler (I would argue this is a doubler or deinterlacer).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phil Smith
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 7717
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Toshiba HD-DVD players do a fantastic job of upscaling SD-DVD, and you can buy one of those for $50. Everything else is slowly going HD, which obviously doesn't need scaling. I think Chip makes a valid point.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
r.bauer
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 280 Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Things that a scaler can offer:
- Display 480i film material at 1440*960@71,93hz
- Display 480i video material at 1440*960@59,94hz
- Display 576i film and video material at 1440*1152@50hz
- Display 1080i50 film and video material al 1080p50
- 1:1,78 aspectratio material: display 1080p23,98 material at 1640*1080p@71,93hz (reduced hor resolution because of limited HDMI/DVI pixel clock of 165Mhz)
- 1:2,35 aspectratio material: display 1080p23,98 material at 1920*817p@71,93hz
It does all of the above with DVD, HD-DVD and Blu-Ray.
It allows me to connect sources such as a HDTV Cable-receiver and get rid of the 1080i@50hz timing problems.
Connect players like the popcornhour and let it just 'render' the material native and let the scaler do all the de-interlacing.
It allows me to switch all may (HDMI) sources and have a single HDMI connection to my CRT.
I am more and more convinced of the added value of a modern scaler in a high-end CRT homecinema.
Movies look so much better in 72hz compared to 60 hz. The smoothness of pans is so much better. This is something that simply cannot be done by a HD-DVD player or a Blu-ray player.
And also the motion-adaptive de-interlacing of video-sources by modern scalers is unmatched by HTPC's. A scaler gives you much more control over the image than a HTPC.
After playing with HTPC's for many, many years I have stopped doing that and I have introduced a scaler to my HT. It is truly one of the best upgrades In my experience.
I know that many of you are drawn to CRT's because of their low price, but that does not have to stop you from getting the best possible picture from your CRT projector.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gary M. Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
removed!
-Gary
Last edited by Gary M. on Sat Jun 14, 2008 9:26 pm; edited 2 times in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stefuel
Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 3353 Location: Green Harbor MA USA
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think my thread has been hijacked by a shameless sales ploy
_________________ Chip
A Barco is only a AmPro with training wheels
Card carrying member of the AVS chain gang.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gary M. Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stefuel wrote: | I think my thread has been hijacked by a shameless sales ploy  |
excuse me
my post and opinion deleted, sorry for the big problem
-Gary
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MikeEby
Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Posts: 5237 Location: Osceola, Indiana
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 10:12 pm Post subject: Re: Is a scaler a thing of the past |
|
|
| stefuel wrote: | | With everything now being displayed natively, and sound processors providing HDMI switching, is there any reason to keep a scaler in the mix? The HD-DVD and BD players do a great job of up-scaling sd dvd's. It seems to me that scalers are quickly becoming ballast. |
I could not display 1080p on my NEC without a scaler/HTPC standard 1080p timings out of a PS3 or HD/DVD player are not right for a NEC. Even a so-called "state of the art" digital projector like an RS2 will not display correct primary colors without a VP with a color management system. So I would say no...we have not got to that point yet.
Mike
_________________ Doing HD since the last century!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stefuel
Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 3353 Location: Green Harbor MA USA
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 10:56 pm Post subject: Re: Is a scaler a thing of the past |
|
|
| MikeEby wrote: | | stefuel wrote: | | With everything now being displayed natively, and sound processors providing HDMI switching, is there any reason to keep a scaler in the mix? The HD-DVD and BD players do a great job of up-scaling sd dvd's. It seems to me that scalers are quickly becoming ballast. |
I could not display 1080p on my NEC without a scaler/HTPC standard 1080p timings out of a PS3 or HD/DVD player are not right for a NEC. Even a so-called "state of the art" digital projector like an RS2 will not display correct primary colors without a VP with a color management system. So I would say no...we have not got to that point yet.
Mike |
So you're saying that there are two problems, timing and colorspace? Are you saying all these G-90's with HDMI input cards with gama control that the "master" has set up are wrong? Is it worth or even possible to squeek out another 1 or 2 per cent and at what cost? I don't have any problems displaying 1080P and getting decent color results even from my lowly 4600HD. I just don't see the benifit of dropping +2 G's to even try. And let's not forget the hook-up simplicity of using a current HDMI 1.3 compatable home theater receiver and a HD Fury or Moome input card. It just don't get any more simple than that.
Mike, I'm not trying to start a arguement here. I'm just trying to decide if there's any justification to the expense.
Me with only two sources (PS3 and HD receiver) would much rather drop the cash on a Pioneer Elite 94TXH, two short and one long HDMI cables and call it a day.
_________________ Chip
A Barco is only a AmPro with training wheels
Card carrying member of the AVS chain gang.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phil Smith
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 7717
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My G70 used the same memory block (the infamous Sony memory scheme) for a Dish receiver, PS3 and HD-A1. They were all identical HD signals (porches, timings, etc). My input was a Moome card with gamma. Everything worked great without a scaler, and I fail to see where I could have benefited from one, other than running a higher refresh rate.
But then again, I've never owned a good scaler, so maybe I'm missing something.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MikeEby
Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Posts: 5237 Location: Osceola, Indiana
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:32 pm Post subject: Re: Is a scaler a thing of the past |
|
|
| stefuel wrote: | | MikeEby wrote: | | stefuel wrote: | | With everything now being displayed natively, and sound processors providing HDMI switching, is there any reason to keep a scaler in the mix? The HD-DVD and BD players do a great job of up-scaling sd dvd's. It seems to me that scalers are quickly becoming ballast. |
I could not display 1080p on my NEC without a scaler/HTPC standard 1080p timings out of a PS3 or HD/DVD player are not right for a NEC. Even a so-called "state of the art" digital projector like an RS2 will not display correct primary colors without a VP with a color management system. So I would say no...we have not got to that point yet.
Mike |
So you're saying that there are two problems, timing and colorspace? Are you saying all these G-90's with HDMI input cards with gama control that the "master" has set up are wrong? Is it worth or even possible to squeek out another 1 or 2 per cent and at what cost? I don't have any problems displaying 1080P and getting decent color results even from my lowly 4600HD. I just don't see the benifit of dropping +2 G's to even try. And let's not forget the hook-up simplicity of using a current HDMI 1.3 compatable home theater receiver and a HD Fury or Moome input card. It just don't get any more simple than that.
Mike, I'm not trying to start a arguement here. I'm just trying to decide if there's any justification to the expense.
Me with only two sources (PS3 and HD receiver) would much rather drop the cash on a Pioneer Elite 94TXH, two short and one long HDMI cables and call it a day. |
No a G90 has no issues with timing or colorspace that I know of, my NEC has problems with PS3 timings. An RS2 has primary color issues. Yes if you have a G90 I would do as you say, PS3 to Moome direct, BTW I think there are several people on this board with G90's and VP50's, maybe they can have some input as to why they use them.
BTW my HTPC was only about $100 more then a PS3@$399 and NEC Moome HDMI 1.3 card@$450, and it plays HD-DVD's too, I run plain ole RGBHV.
Mike
_________________ Doing HD since the last century!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stefuel
Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 3353 Location: Green Harbor MA USA
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Phil Smith wrote: | My G70 used the same memory block (the infamous Sony memory scheme) for a Dish receiver, PS3 and HD-A1. They were all identical HD signals (porches, timings, etc). My input was a Moome card with gamma. Everything worked great without a scaler, and I fail to see where I could have benefited from one, other than running a higher refresh rate.
But then again, I've never owned a good scaler, so maybe I'm missing something. |
Phil, I guess what it boils down to is are you satisfied with the image you get? I know for sure this and the AVS forum is a breeding ground for the "Keep up with the Jones's" mentality which results in thousands of dollars of wasted cash. I don't play that game. I get a fantastic image from my 2K 4600HD. I've never even considered looking at a 8K G-90. I can think of many places that extra 6K can be spent. I'm not saying that the Sony is not superior. It's just not 6K superior. If you are willing to pay 6K for bragging rights then I say go for it. OK, back on track. I do have a scaler in my rack and it's only there for flexability. If for some reason I wanted to play a VHS or connect my video camera it's there but I haven't done that in years. So I don't see my self plopping down coin for a VP 50 any time soon
_________________ Chip
A Barco is only a AmPro with training wheels
Card carrying member of the AVS chain gang.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phil Smith
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 7717
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 1:15 am Post subject: Re: Is a scaler a thing of the past |
|
|
| MikeEby wrote: | | ...my NEC has problems with PS3 timings... |
I don't understand that. My PS3 had identical timings to all my other HD sources. I used the same 1080i setup for all of them, which was really nice because I only had to do one setup.
From my experience with my 3 1080i sources, I assumed pretty much any current HD source you might buy would use the standardized HDTV timings. That certainly was the case with my HD sources. It would be the logical thing to do - have everything standardized and compatible.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phil Smith
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 7717
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 1:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| stefuel wrote: | | Phil Smith wrote: | My G70 used the same memory block (the infamous Sony memory scheme) for a Dish receiver, PS3 and HD-A1. They were all identical HD signals (porches, timings, etc). My input was a Moome card with gamma. Everything worked great without a scaler, and I fail to see where I could have benefited from one, other than running a higher refresh rate.
But then again, I've never owned a good scaler, so maybe I'm missing something. |
Phil, I guess what it boils down to is are you satisfied with the image you get? I know for sure this and the AVS forum is a breeding ground for the "Keep up with the Jones's" mentality which results in thousands of dollars of wasted cash. I don't play that game. I get a fantastic image from my 2K 4600HD. I've never even considered looking at a 8K G-90. I can think of many places that extra 6K can be spent. I'm not saying that the Sony is not superior. It's just not 6K superior. If you are willing to pay 6K for bragging rights then I say go for it. OK, back on track. I do have a scaler in my rack and it's only there for flexability. If for some reason I wanted to play a VHS or connect my video camera it's there but I haven't done that in years. So I don't see my self plopping down coin for a VP 50 any time soon  |
Chip,
I agree with you 100%. If you'll recall, out of all the ribbing you've taken about your Ampro, I never ragged on you. In fact, I entertained the idea of buying one at one time. A 4600 seems like a bargain to me. The only thing that prevented me was dependability issues. Not being a tech, I thought it might be more than I could handle.
I feel the same way about my G70. I think it's a lot of PJ for the money. If G90s get real cheap I might buy one, otherwise I'll stick with my G70. Dave and I have talked about this a lot. A good 8" PJ at 1080i is not that far off of a 9" PJ at 1080p. Like you said, you're not really getting that much more quality with something like a G90. So yes, why spend an extra $6K when the difference is not that much.
PS: Why I keep referring to my G70 in past tense: I sold my house and all of my HT stayed. I have another G70 in storage, but I have no idea when I'll have another house to set it up.
PPS: I don't know of any deficiencies in my G70 as it was setup. Maybe a scaler would improve some things I'm not aware of, but I really doubt it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gary M. Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 3:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know if it's just me or not, but it seems that the ones giving scalers down the road have never owned a really good one or used one in their system for a extended amount of time?
if there is someone here who has a scaler that says they no longer need one or it is useless please speak up because this is something not heard very rarely, if at all
like I said in my first post that I removed, you simply cannot get as spot on a calibration without a scaler involved, can't be done, HTPC included, this is not keeping up with the Jones', its demanding as perfect as possible a image with the least amount of error
-Gary
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
r.bauer
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 280 Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:24 am Post subject: Re: Is a scaler a thing of the past |
|
|
| stefuel wrote: | I'm just trying to decide if there's any justification to the expense.
Me with only two sources (PS3 and HD receiver) would much rather drop the cash on a Pioneer Elite 94TXH, two short and one long HDMI cables and call it a day. |
Good point, but the advantages are:
- You can display movies at 72hz (or 48hz)
- De-interlacing your settop box to output 1080p.
And when they air a movie, you can also output it at 48 or 72hz! Also displaying a progressive signal gives more lightoutput, as the phosphor gets hit more often by the electron beam.
Many people say that an 8" LC projector 'is just fine' at 1080i. While it is fine at 1080i, it really shines at 1080p in my opinion. All good 8" CRT's will do 1080p whithout a problem. The spatial resolution of 1080i and 1080p are the same, so if 1080i goes, 1080p also goes, and progressive just looks so much better, it is just more easy on the eye.
Another benefit is solving timing issues, if you have them. This is more important for european people as we have to put-up with the (for CRT viewers) horrible timings of 720p and 1080i at 50hz. You MUST change the porch settings, or else you will not be able to see the entire picture:
- On Barco's there is not enough H-size for both 720p and 1080i.
- A PS3 (at 60hz!) will not display the entire picture, the left and right side are 'wrapped around' the ends of the image line, so you miss something of the picture.
I have come across scalers all the time when doing ISF calibrations, and I like them a lot. I can see the added depth that modern scalers generate in the picture. I can see that pans are better at 72hz (old discussion...) It is really something that has to be seen to be believed. I do think a scaler has an added value in a high-end HomeTheather where the projector is perfectly setup and greyscaled. And not only image quality, but also ease of use increases dramatically with the introduction of a scaler.
How important these benefits are to you is a personal choice, but when I buy a piece of equipment, I would like it to last at least 5 years ore more. And I know that a modern scaler, such as a Crystalio II or a VP50pro will last me at least five years.
Last edited by r.bauer on Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:42 am; edited 2 times in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
r.bauer
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 280 Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| stefuel wrote: | | Phil, I guess what it boils down to is are you satisfied with the image you get? I know for sure this and the AVS forum is a breeding ground for the "Keep up with the Jones's" mentality which results in thousands of dollars of wasted cash. |
True. Especially over on the AVS in the high-end digital forum I am surprised by the amount of people who spend a lot of money on a scaler just to get the primaries of their digital projector right. It is a bloody shame that a projector leaves the factory with wrong primaries in the first place. If digitals were to have better primaries, they would loose lightoutput, so the manufacturers are competing each other on this agian.
But with CRT's it is different. I like them because of the picture quality they give me. Spot on primaries, perfect black level, no motion-blurr during scan. Even now, a CRT is sharper during pans than any digital out there. So with this kind of display device, a scaler is a must. Why have a Rolls-Royce and not have the driver as well? 8)
I know many people are into CRT's these days just because they can be had for little money. They will never put a scaler in their system, and that's fine. But the people who have bought a CRT because of the image quality they (still) get from it, a modern scaler will bring you so much more.
If you still need to be convinced about the benefits of a scaler, go to someone who has a properly setup system consisting of a CRT-projector and a modern scaler and see it for yourself and then you really can decide for yourself.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|