| Author |
Message |
Mark_A_W
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 3068 Location: Sunny Melbourne Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 2:33 pm Post subject: HCFR cal files for XG LC (or G70) and SONYGW900 Monitor here |
|
|
Hi Guys
With the help of Benny (Russ) and his Colorfacts system we have generated HCFR cal files for the:
- NEC XG LC CRT projector, and this should be good for the Sony G70 too, as it has the same tubes, C-elements and lenses.
- Sony 24" Trinitron GW900 CRT monitor (actually a HP clone).
We were stoked to see the HFCR system measures basically exactly the same as Colorfacts, once you have generated a Cal file.
But even with the Simple Calibration file you can generate with no reference, it's still pretty close, and perfectly usable.
Am I supposed to send them in to HCFR?
Anyway they are attached.
Hope someone uses them!
Mark
| Description: |
|
 Download |
| Filename: |
HCFR_NEC-XG_LC_Sony_G70_GW900.zip |
| Filesize: |
1.43 KB |
| Downloaded: |
53 Time(s) |
Last edited by Mark_A_W on Mon Mar 31, 2008 3:58 am; edited 2 times in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WTS
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 1276 Location: Calgary
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
HI,
What probe did you use?
_________________ Thanks
Walter
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, same question here. I'm really interested in trying it out after I get the G70 on the ceiling, but I haven't even bought a sensor yet... which one did you use/which one would you recommend?
I'm also curious what this file is and how it was generated?
Thanks!
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WTS
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 1276 Location: Calgary
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
I'm using the HCFR probe and I was using the NEC6PG file which was with the original HCFR software and I'm quite happy with the results. BUt I'll give this new file a try and see how it turns out. I have no idea what probe was used with the 6PG file.
_________________ Thanks
Walter
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AFryia
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 965 Location: S.E. Michigan VPH-G70Q
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Mark and Russ.
My search for a HFCR G70 cal file is over.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
benareeno
Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 1614 Location: ottawa, canada
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
what does a cal file offer you??
Your projector is not the same as his to begin with, so how can a file help you??
Just buy a colorimeter for 100 bucks and do your own grey scale, no?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark_A_W
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 3068 Location: Sunny Melbourne Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To make the Cal file you need to measure the primaries of each display, and enter the measured primaries into the HCFR software - for each display TYPE.
The HCFR system can measure greyscale, but as far as I understand it can't do primaries *accurately*, hence the need for the Cal file for each TYPE of display. (That said it's pretty good without one.)
The reference Colourimeter was Colorfacts with a Gretag Macbeth Eye One Beamer.
And yes, the cal file generated is good for all XG LCs, G70's (and the other file for the Sony 16:10 24" CRT monitor family). It is a raw reading of the phosphurs (+ lens filtering) and would not vary much at all.
For a PG or XG air coupled, the 6PG Cal file that is included would theoretically be better, due to different lens filtering, but I don't know how it was generated.
Give it a go, but always compare results to a self generated Simple Calibration file. They should be close, but not identical.
And yes Ben, you build the ~$100 DIY probe and just go....but you need a Cal file for each display type, as the raw primaries are different for each.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark_A_W
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 3068 Location: Sunny Melbourne Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Raw XG xyY numbers are:
Red
x: 0.6270
y: 0.3400
Y: 2.6000
Green
x: 0.3005
y: 0.6000
Y: 6.2100
Blue
x: 0.3120
y: 0.3320
Y: 5.940
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AFryia
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 965 Location: S.E. Michigan VPH-G70Q
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| benareeno wrote: |
Your projector is not the same as his to begin with, so how can a file help you??
|
No, but the tubes and "C" elements are I believe.
| benareeno wrote: |
Just buy a colorimeter for 100 bucks and do your own grey scale, no?
|
I have a Spyder II and I'm not happy with the results.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark_A_W
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 3068 Location: Sunny Melbourne Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| AFryia wrote: |
No, but the tubes and "C" elements are I believe. |
Exactly. The tubes are the same (in fact my G and B are G70 tubes technically..not that it matters), and the C elements are the same/
The Colorfacts and HCFR measurements were the same after Calibration.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kschmit2
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 1141 Location: Heidelberg, Germany
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 11:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just got a Spyder3 Elite as a loaner.
Maybe I can see how well it works. I don't thinks it's supported in the HCFR tool yet, though, so I would have to use the included tools.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
benareeno
Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 1614 Location: ottawa, canada
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
you may not like the spyder results because you need to defocus blue even more than you have...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kal Forum Administrator
Joined: 06 Mar 2006 Posts: 18114 Location: Ottawa, Canada
TV/Projector: JVC DLA-NZ7
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mark_A_W wrote: | To make the Cal file you need to measure the primaries of each display, and enter the measured primaries into the HCFR software - for each display TYPE.
The HCFR system can measure greyscale, but as far as I understand it can't do primaries *accurately*, hence the need for the Cal file for each TYPE of display. (That said it's pretty good without one.) |
So how exactly do you create a cal file?
Isn't it as simple as just measuring the output with only the one tube in question on?
I'm still confused as to what exactly is in this cal file and why it's needed - isn't what you measure, say, out of the red tube your display's correct primary? How could it be anything different?
When you use HCFR and a probe (or any other software/probe combo for that matter) and tell it to measure your primaries, aren't you simply recording the primaries one tube at at time that the probe sees? How could it be any different from one G70 to another? Unless the tubes are completely worn, I don't see how it could change so whatever you measure for a primary should be the right value since only one tube will on at once.
Or maybe the better question is: How exactly do you create a cal file?
I'm playing around with my Spyder II and HCFR.to get a feel for how it works. When I measure the primaries on my crappy Dell laptop LCD screen using the built in test patterns I get:
Before greyscale calibration:
Red: x=0.594, y=0.346
Green: x=0.321, y=0.555
Blue: x=0.154, y=0.141
After greyscale calibration they're very close to the originals:
Red: x=0.589, y=0.346
Green: x=0.313, y=0.551
Blue: x=0.154, y=0.141
Where the perfect Rec601 targets actually are:
Red: x=0.630 y=0.340
Green: x=0.310 y= 0.595
Blue: x=0.155 y=0.70
So even though on an LCD not all colours may be off when you switch between measuring red/green/blue primaries, you see that the before & after greyscale results are pretty close.
(The "after" greyscale was done with the Spyder2 automated windows colour profiling, not by adjusting gains/cutoffs)...
Kal
_________________
Support our site by using our affiliate links. We thank you!
My basement/HT/bar/brewery build 2.0
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David_Web
Joined: 02 May 2007 Posts: 418 Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 7:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You cannot move primaries in any way. Unless you can change the wavelength of the light they emit. (or by adding a filter if the spectrum peak is wide)
You could make a correlated move inward in the triangle by mixing two primaries with each other to get a more correct response.
The calibration file is to give the wavelength of the source to it can properly understand how bright each primary is in relation to it's own response.
This is just an educated guess tough.
btw can any one post a few more raw data from different filtered/unfiltered tubes?
_________________ SNR of people are ridiculously low.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
garyfritz
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 12088 Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| David_Web wrote: | | You cannot move primaries in any way. Unless you can change the wavelength of the light they emit. (or by adding a filter if the spectrum peak is wide) |
Exactly. You CAN move the primaries in CRTs by filtering. That's what color-filtered lenses are all about -- moving the primaries. See e.g. this post.
| Quote: | | btw can any one post a few more raw data from different filtered/unfiltered tubes? |
According to data I've seen, the specified coords for 180DYB22 (B22 phosphor), P19LCP07, and P19LUG (both RJA/HKA/BMB phosphor) is: R = 0.644/0.347, G = 0.337/0.575, B = 0.144/0.068, all +/- 0.020. 180DMB22 (Marquee 8500, B22 phosphor) is the same for R and G, but B = 0.148/0.059. Don't ask me why 180DYB22 and 180DMB22 have the same phosphors from the same manufacturer but supposedly different blue coords, but the DYB and DMB figures may have come from different sources. But it's still well within the +/- 0.020 tolerances.
SMPTE C spec is R = .630/.340, G = .310/.595, B = .155/.070. You can see that red and especially green are off from the SMPTE C coords used to record the image. That's why moving the primaries with filtered lenses, to match the SMTPE C coords as closely as possible, is so beneficial.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kal Forum Administrator
Joined: 06 Mar 2006 Posts: 18114 Location: Ottawa, Canada
TV/Projector: JVC DLA-NZ7
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| David_Web wrote: | The calibration file is to give the wavelength of the source to it can properly understand how bright each primary is in relation to it's own response.
This is just an educated guess tough. |
This is what I would guess too. My problem in understanding this is that we KNOW the Rec601 [SD] primary values (Gary and I listed them above), and we know the Rec709 [HD] primary values too. If we measure the primaries that our projector puts out, we know how far off we are from the standards.
All we don't know is how far off we are from what our projector is actually CAPABLE of doing - it would seem you'd need the cal file for this. But really, who cares? It's the Rec601/709 primaries we're aiming for.
I suppose all the cal file will tell us is if our measured primaries are as close as possible to what the projector can achieve and that no further improvements are possible.
I wish I did know what the primaries on my Zenith 1200 were... the tubes are P16LNP, but who knows what effect the tinted primaries (due to LC) does...
Kal
_________________
Support our site by using our affiliate links. We thank you!
My basement/HT/bar/brewery build 2.0
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
garyfritz
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 12088 Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you've got colored C-elements, you can be sure it changes the primaries.
Kal, I haven't had a chance to look at the new release of HCFR at all, so I haven't figured out any of this cal file stuff. You'd probably have a lot better luck asking in the calibration forum on AVS. That's where all the HCFR experts hang out.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David_Web
Joined: 02 May 2007 Posts: 418 Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
" If you've got colored C-elements, you can be sure it changes the primaries. "
That's what I said.
Take the green tube. It's spectral response is a big 'lump' ranging from deep green to yellow. It's correlated primary color is light green.
If you add a filter cutting away the yellow bit your correlated primary color would now be a darker and deeper green.
Same thing with red.
And that is also why you filter the red and green tube.
_________________ SNR of people are ridiculously low.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kal Forum Administrator
Joined: 06 Mar 2006 Posts: 18114 Location: Ottawa, Canada
TV/Projector: JVC DLA-NZ7
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
garyfritz
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 12088 Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey Kal, there's this really great website where you can get info on what tubes the G70/XGLC use. Maybe you should talk to the webmaster.
The G70 uses P16LJE08, XGLC uses P16LJE07. Who knows how the C-elements compare.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|