|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Moose
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 788 Location: Minnesota
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:31 pm Post subject: Yet Another (ho-hum) "Ultimate" Speaker debuts |
|
|
From the Stereophile site : http://www.stereophile.com/news/102907siltech/. Whoopee! Another cost-no-object statement of the speaker art, the Siltech Pantheon Loudspeaker. Big, f...ing deal. $120,000 for something that should cost no more than $10,000, maybe $15,000 at the very outside. Look at the photos and the exploded view. I don't see anything in the drivers, design, materials, construction or finish that could account for such a hefty price. I feel the same way about Wilson and others of that ilk. They may perform very well, they may even be at or near the top, but their prices have no relation whatsoever to their manufacturing cost, overhead and decent profits all around. But I guess these exercises are not directed towards you and me, just people with money to burn and no ability to judge value.
_________________ In the real world, I am alan halvorson, King of the Wild Frontier and Swell Guy.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NateTTU
Joined: 14 Feb 2007 Posts: 297
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
This kinda points to the reason why I have decided to create diy speakers. They really aren't difficult and the price to performance ratio is outstanding since the audio world's prices are so inflated. The designs I'm considering "supposedly" rival speakers in the 10-15k range and cost me less than $800 a pair. Everything is subjective of course but considering the guys who actually create diy speakers are hired by large audio companies to create multi-thousand dollar speakers speaks volumes in my opinion. (no pun intended) They also have the amazing ability to test out these 10-15k speakers in their own home and compare their designs with the commercial designs and find out theirs is better. If you can do a little wood work and some soldering then you should be just fine to make your own.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When it comes to stuff in the stratospheric price range you mentioned, it seems to me the retail prices are more likely correlated to A) what the market will bare, and B) sales numbers to generate the revenue necessary to support the lifestyles (mortgage, Porsche, airplane payments, etc.) of the owner(s). The actual cost of design, materials, and construction of the products themselves would be almost irrelevant. I'm exaggerating... a little.
One exception would be the finishing. I wouldn't be surprised if Wilson spends something north of $10k (probably as much or more than the drivers and crossovers and assembled cabinets) just to finish a set of gloss Grand Slams. I mean, that would take a LOT of work to finish those things that beautifully.
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kal Forum Administrator
Joined: 06 Mar 2006 Posts: 18114 Location: Ottawa, Canada
TV/Projector: JVC DLA-NZ7
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:06 am Post subject: Re: Yet Another (ho-hum) "Ultimate" Speaker debuts |
|
|
| Moose wrote: | | I don't see anything in the drivers, design, materials, construction or finish that could account for such a hefty price. |
I'm not on the manufacturer's side at all here, but you guys are forgetting one important factor here.
These companies aren't just sitting down and designing these speakers in a day or two and then building them. It can take millions of dollars in YEARS of research by many people trying different things out to come up with something that works the way they want it to.
Get a team of 3-5 good engineers making reasonable salaries you've spent quite a bit of money after 1 year of R&D just on salaries alone, forget about costs to build prototypes, test equipment, housing them, etc.
Material costs in building stuff amounts to a small portion of the finished price. Even less so with things that are extremely low volume.
Could you build these speakers if you were given a complete bill of materials and instructions? Of course! But that's not the point.
There's a big reason why the flagship products of any company cost as much as they do. Wait a few years and that technology trickles down the mainstream masses almost for free.
Sorry, but it always bugs me when someone points out that a $1000 gadget only has $100 worth of parts. That's really irrelevant.
Kal
_________________
Support our site by using our affiliate links. We thank you!
My basement/HT/bar/brewery build 2.0
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emdawgz1
Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 7949
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 3:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| NateTTU wrote: | | This kinda points to the reason why I have decided to create diy speakers. They really aren't difficult and the price to performance ratio is outstanding since the audio world's prices are so inflated. The designs I'm considering "supposedly" rival speakers in the 10-15k range and cost me less than $800 a pair. Everything is subjective of course but considering the guys who actually create diy speakers are hired by large audio companies to create multi-thousand dollar speakers speaks volumes in my opinion. (no pun intended) They also have the amazing ability to test out these 10-15k speakers in their own home and compare their designs with the commercial designs and find out theirs is better. If you can do a little wood work and some soldering then you should be just fine to make your own. |
what diy design are you gonna use???
_________________ Follow my blog
www.thesinglebrother.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NateTTU
Joined: 14 Feb 2007 Posts: 297
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 6:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with most of what you said Kal, but I think its really about the bottom line. But when I find a way to get the performance of a 15k piece of equipment for a very small fraction of the price I'm going to jump on that and run and never look back.
emdawgz,
I'm going to be using a design called "the statements" and it was created by a guy named Jim Holtz. I will be using also his center channel and mini statements for surrounds. total for all five should run about $1600 in parts plus the time and effort required for me to build. however the performance of the statements alone could fetch upwards of 10k in a boutique store, according to things I have read. Until I build and find out I won't really understand what the craze is over the diy audio community but I do look forward to building these in the upcoming months. I have read many reports of people who would buy names that I know, such as klipsch, axiom, svs etc. building some of the very basic and cheapest diy builds and are very suprised at their results. (meaning their cheap speakers they just made beat the crap out of their sometimes very expensive commercial speakers)
i would like one day to invite some people over to check out my system once it is up and running and letting others decide for themselves wether the diy route was worth it or not.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
oliverg
Joined: 15 May 2007 Posts: 800 Location: Melbourne, Australia
TV/Projector: Sony G90 X2 - Vidikron Vision 1
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 7:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have a friend that made his own electrostatic speakers for $500 and they sounded VERY good. I was really impressed, since he literally threw them together over 2 months. The finish was excellent. They were very efficient. The sound was comparable to my Martin Logans.
He could have made 10 and sold them for 10k each and whoever bought them would have been happy with them!
Valve amplifiers are one area where circuits have been around for decades but someone will throw a label on an amp based on an old circuit and sell it for 50k. If (as Kal says) a company puts in a large investment, they deserve to get it back - but in some cases this isn't happening. Its just marketing. At 100k, you only have to sell one or two a year if your overheads and research has been minimal to earn yourself a decent living.
I remember on eBay one guy sold a pair of old loudspeakers from the 1930s (cones) and made out that they were "ultra high fidelity) and "single driver - no crossovers!". They went for 15k odd US!
I think the idea of building your own and seeing what others (and you) think is a really commendable idea. I bet they sound just honkin!!
Kind regards
_________________ ( R ) G ( G ) 9 ( B ) 0 ( R ) G ( G ) 9 ( B ) 0
( R ) G ( G ) 9 ( B ) 0 ( R ) G ( G ) 9 ( B ) 0
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
garyfritz
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 12088 Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cmjohnson
Joined: 03 Apr 2006 Posts: 5180 Location: Buried under G90s
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Keep in mind that SOME speakers do indeed have a lot of money in just materials costs. Wilson's X and W laminate materials, for
example, ARE entirely custom-made products and are likely hideously expensive per square foot. And remember, you always
have to recoup your engineering costs from your finished product. If it cost a million dollars in engineer's wages, prototype tooling
and parts costs, and other expenses relating to the project, you have to be abe to recoup your million dollars out of the profits
from the sale of individual speakers. It MIGHT cost you just 2000 dollars to make a 25,000 dollar speaker, at raw manufacturing
cost when in full-scale production, but part of that profit HAS to go to covering the engineering and development costs that went into
its creation.
If high end audio companies are making such outrageous profits, why is it that they're such small companies and are known to go
bankrupt from time to time?
CJ
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emdawgz1
Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 7949
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WTS
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 1276 Location: Calgary
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
HI,
Trust me, what Kal says is so true. A old long time friend of mine had his own speaker company in which he designed the drivers/crossovers/boxes himself. He spend years( and lots of money) designing and redesigning drivers/crossovers/boxes to get them to the point were he was satisfied and even then he didn't think they were quite there yet. And that was even after he had won awards for the design/sound quality of his speakers.
Yes you can build speakers with off the shelf drivers and have them sound just as good or better than store bought boxes. My present speakers I bought off the shelf drivers by the name of DynAudio, which are no longer available to the public because they decided to build their own boxes to house their drivers. The same drivers in my boxes are now used in their top of the line boxes which I beleive are somewhere in the nieghbourhood of 20k+ a pair. THere are still a number of top notch drivers available for the DIY builder, SEAs make excellent drivers. Do a search for Linkwitz(he's the original designer of the Linkwitz crossover which is found in practically 90% of all speakers on the market today), his website use to have a list of drivers which he has tested and found to be the best for any type of system you'd want to build. He also has complete plans for the DIY.
_________________ Thanks
Walter
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Moose
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 788 Location: Minnesota
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'll grant that it can take some time, considerable work and some money developing these high-buck products. But not millions in any of these cases. There is nothing original in this speaker. It's just a conventional design with the addition of some electrostatic elements on the top. No new technology is apparent anywhere. There are now several programs available at low cost that are of great assistance in speaker design. You and I can afford them. Heck, one I'm considering costs $250 and is as sophisticated as anyone needs. No more long, tedious, trial and error process taking years required anymore. If you can't do it, hire someone! Just look at this thing. It's a woofer, midrange and electrostatic tweeter in an overdone, gaudy box. For the money I want it tri-amped. Get a nice Ashly, Rane or whatever active crossover, some amps, spend a little time adjusting and testing things, and you're there. And waaaaaay under $120,000.
I'll tell you again, there is nothing about this speaker that justifies its price.
_________________ In the real world, I am alan halvorson, King of the Wild Frontier and Swell Guy.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JustGreg
Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 3098 Location: Kenosha, WI
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Moose wrote: | I'll grant that it can take some time, considerable work and some money developing these high-buck products. But not millions in any of these cases. There is nothing original in this speaker. It's just a conventional design with the addition of some electrostatic elements on the top. No new technology is apparent anywhere. There are now several programs available at low cost that are of great assistance in speaker design. You and I can afford them. Heck, one I'm considering costs $250 and is as sophisticated as anyone needs. No more long, tedious, trial and error process taking years required anymore. If you can't do it, hire someone! Just look at this thing. It's a woofer, midrange and electrostatic tweeter in an overdone, gaudy box. For the money I want it tri-amped. Get a nice Ashly, Rane or whatever active crossover, some amps, spend a little time adjusting and testing things, and you're there. And waaaaaay under $120,000.
I'll tell you again, there is nothing about this speaker that justifies its price. |
You hit on something I was thinking while reading this thread which is....What the hell can you redesign over and over that hasn't been done before? Mono block and receiver technology re-engineering I fully support because they support changes in codecs and format.
I understand the use of new alloys for the baskets, and new materials for the motors, and that the crossover is designed uniquely to compliment the drivers/tweeter, and the cabinet design, and the latest audio formats, but with speaker building software, woofs, mids, various types of tweeters and tools available from PartsExpress for example, I feel the storebought highends might just be milking things a tad.
If those types of company's are spending millions of $$$ to pay engineers to redesign the wheel to achieve close to DIY results...they ARE catering to bragging rights elitists. And I mean them no disrespect because research shows there are some legends in speaker design still hard at work; but conversely there's alot of guys here with some very respectable audio systems that probably would benefit marginally, if at all, by shelling out $50K or more.
And it's all in the ear of the beholder too. I personally suffer from tinitus so (assuming I had the cash) would spending that much money overcome my afliction or would I gain nothing for all that money? I'd take a cutting edge receiver and a kick ass center channel with a dedicated monoblock, and one more sub and consider that money better spent. But then again I don't have a plane, two homes, a yacht, a small fleet of personal vehicles, more bricks in my driveway than used to build my house, or a gold plated bidet to pass my Pâté de foie gras.
_________________ Greg
"Is it ignorance or apathy? Hey, I don't know and I don't care!" --Jimmy Buffett
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|