|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Zebra
Joined: 02 Jul 2020 Posts: 93 Location: NJ USA
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2020 11:39 pm Post subject: Old 480i crt projector advice |
|
|
Does anyone here have any experience with one of the older 480i only 7" crt projectors?
Looking at the specs on this site, most of these units seem to have a stated light output around 400 lumens. It's a lot lower than I'm used to working with. Am I being unrealistic to expect one to produce a 50-60" 4:3 image in a dimly lit room?
What sort of throw / distance do I need to project a 50" or 60" image with something like a Sony 1020 or a Vidikron VPF 40se? I can't seem to find this info anywhere.
I thinking of grabbing one of these old units for an arcade light gun cab I picked it (it's crt monitor broke). Finding larger size CRT monitors with RGB is getting harder but some of these 15khz crt projectors are being thrown away.
I have only used some of the later and brighter 9" CRT projectors. My experience with these old 480i only units is limited. I'm wondering if they are worth rescuing for vintage gamers?
Is there any reason why they wouldn't work well with a higher gain screen? I have a 1.6 gain Sony Dynaclesr portable 80" ALR screen in storage. I'm wondering if I can make up for the limited light output with it.
My 29"CRT arcade monitors are fine for most old games but I'm thinking that Time Crisis would be better on a 50" or 60" screen....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Curt Palme CRT Tech
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 24396 Location: Langley, BC
TV/Projector: All of them!
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
You're going to have age related issue. I'd grab one of the latest CRTs able to do 480i like a Barco 70X series. Brighter tubes, longer lasting, and will display 480i just fine. All Vidikrons that they made themselves were awful projectors, they were fine with they rebadged the Electrohome series.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
garyfritz
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 12088 Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 1:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
400 lumens is plenty for the size of screen you want. The formula is Gain * Lumens / squarefeet = foot-candles. A 60x45 4:3 screen is 18.75 sq ft, so 400/18.75 = over 21 ftC. That's more than enough for a dimly-lit room -- wouldn't even have to be all that dim.
Last edited by garyfritz on Mon Aug 31, 2020 2:56 am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AnalogRocks Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 26706 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
TV/Projector: Sony 1252Q, AMPRO 4000G
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have a pair of SONY 1040's I use for Halloween. 50-60" picture off the top of my head would be somewhere between 5-7 feet. They work great on high gain screens although SONY curved theirs. I have one of the 15 gain 4:3 screens. Never did try Timecrysis on it. I did try that with a D50 and Stewart Studiotek 1.3 gain, 110" in a not darkened room on the PS2. It didn't work. If you can score a 50 or 60 inch high gain 13-15 gain it would be great.
Eyes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NN7H_2ziBQU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3q-wd6CWYs
_________________ Tech support for nothing
CRT.
HD done right!
Last edited by AnalogRocks on Mon Aug 31, 2020 3:09 am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
garyfritz
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 12088 Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 3:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
High-gain screen?? I would think a 13-15 gain with 400 lumens would be enough to fry ants. Like I said, 400 lumens should put over 20 ftC on a 60x45 screen. That's assuming you're not displaying a bright image, since the CRT is current-limited to how much area it can light up. But with a typical dark-ish video game I would think it would come close to the rated lumens. Was the D50 too dim? It's rated 800 lumens, so it should do fine with a larger image, especially with 1.3 gain.
My 8500 was rated 1200 lumens, and it had no trouble lighting up an 85x48 1.3 gain screen -- 12-14 ftC if I remember right. And that was using only a 16x9 area on the phosphor, so you could have displayed an 85x64 image with the same brightness.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AnalogRocks Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 26706 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
TV/Projector: Sony 1252Q, AMPRO 4000G
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 3:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| garyfritz wrote: | High-gain screen?? I would think a 13-15 gain with 400 lumens would be enough to fry ants. Like I said, 400 lumens should put over 20 ftC on a 60x45 screen. That's assuming you're not displaying a bright image, since the CRT is current-limited to how much area it can light up. But with a typical dark-ish video game I would think it would come close to the rated lumens. Was the D50 too dim? It's rated 800 lumens, so it should do fine with a larger image, especially with 1.3 gain.
My 8500 was rated 1200 lumens, and it had no trouble lighting up an 85x48 1.3 gain screen -- 12-14 ftC if I remember right. And that was using only a 16x9 area on the phosphor, so you could have displayed an 85x64 image with the same brightness. |
Forgot to add 4:3 110". The Guncon for Timecrysis wouldn't register on the ps2. Too dim.
_________________ Tech support for nothing
CRT.
HD done right!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
garyfritz
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 12088 Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 4:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
110" should be about 40 sq ft. That's pretty big got 800 lumens, but should still be more than watchable with 20 ftC in bright areas. Hard telling how much light the Guncon wanted tho.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AnalogRocks Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 26706 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
TV/Projector: Sony 1252Q, AMPRO 4000G
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 4:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| garyfritz wrote: | | 110" should be about 40 sq ft. That's pretty big got 800 lumens, but should still be more than watchable with 20 ftC in bright areas. Hard telling how much light the Guncon wanted tho. |
Think 25" CRT direct view.
_________________ Tech support for nothing
CRT.
HD done right!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zebra
Joined: 02 Jul 2020 Posts: 93 Location: NJ USA
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| AnalogRocks wrote: | | garyfritz wrote: | High-gain screen?? I would think a 13-15 gain with 400 lumens would be enough to fry ants. Like I said, 400 lumens should put over 20 ftC on a 60x45 screen. That's assuming you're not displaying a bright image, since the CRT is current-limited to how much area it can light up. But with a typical dark-ish video game I would think it would come close to the rated lumens. Was the D50 too dim? It's rated 800 lumens, so it should do fine with a larger image, especially with 1.3 gain.
My 8500 was rated 1200 lumens, and it had no trouble lighting up an 85x48 1.3 gain screen -- 12-14 ftC if I remember right. And that was using only a 16x9 area on the phosphor, so you could have displayed an 85x64 image with the same brightness. |
Forgot to add 4:3 110". The Guncon for Timecrysis wouldn't register on the ps2. Too dim. |
That's why I was thinking about a smaller 50"-60" screen and possibly rear projection. The official Namco guncon 2 is usually better at registering reliably than the guncon 1 or any 3rd party gun. Plus, I have mine in a Time Crisis arcade gun shell which has a glass lens (lets through 30% more light). I'm hopeful that it'll work.
I'd plan to start at 50" and experiment to see how large I can go. The deluxe arcade cab used a 60" rear projection TV.
I'm not sure what effect a high gain screen might have on the light gun. I think there is a chance it could be an issue due to how they reflect / direct light. They have a fairly steep half gain angle on the Dyna clear screens.
Does the 8500 project an unprocessed image or does it line double 15khz content? Line doublers or deinterlacing would prevent light guns from working. That's the other reason for keeping it small. I'm worried about how a 480i image would look at larger sizes. I can deal with gaps between scanlines on 240p content. Not so much with interlaced 15khz...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zebra
Joined: 02 Jul 2020 Posts: 93 Location: NJ USA
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 6:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Curt Palme wrote: | | You're going to have age related issue. I'd grab one of the latest CRTs able to do 480i like a Barco 70X series. Brighter tubes, longer lasting, and will display 480i just fine. All Vidikrons that they made themselves were awful projectors, they were fine with they rebadged the Electrohome series. |
I'm planning to get both. A 9" crt for higher res content and crappy coarse pitch 480i only unit for 15khz games.
The fine pitch and high voltage regulator on my 15khz broadcast monitors (like my Ikegami Tm20-90rh) creates jaggies in 240p games which stops them looking authentic. Cga arcade monitors use the same crappy tubes as you'd find in cheap Walmart TV's at the time. I know this will sound weird to this crowd but looking authentic to the arcade is more important than image quality for this purpose.
With that said, I'm not sure it's the same with CRT projectors. I can't find much info on how the pitch size differs between the various CRT projectors. The ideal is .95mm / 500 tvl or less on arcade monitors and a poor quality voltage regulator that causes enough bloom to hide the gaps between scanlines. Basically, the opposite of what I'd want for movies.
Would I be right in assuming that CRT projectors with higher bandwidths use finer pitch tubes?
If that is the case, are there any 480i only units that aren't problematic (assuming they arrive working)?
This is the jagged look on my Ikegami 20" (900 tvl) I wanted to avoid by going with an older projector:
On my arcade monitors heads look round instead of jagged and there's no large gaps between lines:
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AnalogRocks Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 26706 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
TV/Projector: Sony 1252Q, AMPRO 4000G
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is no pitch as it were. The pitch on a TV tube is controlled by the shadow mask. Projection tubes dont have this.
What we have is the difference be tween ES - Electro Static focus sets, and EM - Electromagnetic Focus sets. ES sets work like a traditional TV tube. The older the tubes get the softer they look. Elecromagnetic sets hold the focus all through the life of the tubes.
All tubes age or burn in, as the phosphor is used up. So on an ES set with 20 000 hours you'll have odd color from the tube burn and that soft - blur together - look where the scan lines blur together. EM sets will keep that crisp scan line look with browning tubes.
You know that look you get on the old arcade monitors where the whole screen looks brown.
See here: http://www.curtpalme.com/TubeCondition.shtm
_________________ Tech support for nothing
CRT.
HD done right!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Curt Palme CRT Tech
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 24396 Location: Langley, BC
TV/Projector: All of them!
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Zebra wrote: |
Does the 8500 project an unprocessed image or does it line double 15khz content? Line doublers or deinterlacing would prevent light guns from working. That's the other reason for keeping it small. I'm worried about how a 480i image would look at larger sizes. I can deal with gaps between scanlines on 240p content. Not so much with interlaced 15khz... |
UNless a CRT projector has a built in line doubler (was an option on all CRTs), there's no processing in any CRT projector. Resolution in = resolution displayed.
Having said that, the Electrohome marquee video input card did some awful processing of the video image. It was consistently the worst 480i image I'd ever seen. Barco did a decent job, as did Sony. The 909 didn't accept a 480i input, the lowest it would do is 480p as per the specs in the Barco 909 manual.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zebra
Joined: 02 Jul 2020 Posts: 93 Location: NJ USA
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| AnalogRocks wrote: | There is no pitch as it were. The pitch on a TV tube is controlled by the shadow mask. Projection tubes dont have this.
What we have is the difference be tween ES - Electro Static focus sets, and EM - Electromagnetic Focus sets. ES sets work like a traditional TV tube. The older the tubes get the softer they look. Elecromagnetic sets hold the focus all through the life of the tubes.
All tubes age or burn in, as the phosphor is used up. So on an ES set with 20 000 hours you'll have odd color from the tube burn and that soft - blur together - look where the scan lines blur together. EM sets will keep that crisp scan line look with browning tubes.
You know that look you get on the old arcade monitors where the whole screen looks brown.
See here: http://www.curtpalme.com/TubeCondition.shtm |
Assuming you had new tubes or ones with little use, are you saying you'd find no difference in the look of old 240p content between older cheaper 7" devices and newer more expensive 7", 8" and 9"devices with regard to jaggies and bloom?
I understand about degradation over time and that newer / more expensive projectors allow more precise control for focusing the image and for better convergence. These are issues I'm used to dealing with on my crt monitors. The pitch size and bloom issues are an additional problem for them though.
One of my 20" Ikegami monitors has over 20,000 hours on the tube but it still produces a considerably sharper and more jagged image (for game graphics) with so little bloom that there's thick black gaps between scanlines. I got my Wells Gardner K7000 arcade monitor (.9mm pitch) and my Billabs tri-sync (.79mm pitch) new and they both always produced a arcade authentic image with no jaggies or visible gaps between lines.
I always thought of the mismatched tube pitch as the analog equivalent of a bad scaling artifact. The look on high end monitors resembles poor scaling on an HD flat screen and causes a similar loss of detail. A smooth face on a sprite becomes a bunch of blocks.
Anyway, if that issue doesn't exist on CRT projectors then maybe I can manage with one 9" device instead of needing a second for gaming. It's amazing how versatile CRT projectors are. Especially if a late model high bandwidth 9"can display an authentic looking 240p without giving it that broadcast monitor look.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zebra
Joined: 02 Jul 2020 Posts: 93 Location: NJ USA
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Curt Palme wrote: | | Zebra wrote: |
Does the 8500 project an unprocessed image or does it line double 15khz content? Line doublers or deinterlacing would prevent light guns from working. That's the other reason for keeping it small. I'm worried about how a 480i image would look at larger sizes. I can deal with gaps between scanlines on 240p content. Not so much with interlaced 15khz... |
UNless a CRT projector has a built in line doubler (was an option on all CRTs), there's no processing in any CRT projector. Resolution in = resolution displayed.
Having said that, the Electrohome marquee video input card did some awful processing of the video image. It was consistently the worst 480i image I'd ever seen. Barco did a decent job, as did Sony. The 909 didn't accept a 480i input, the lowest it would do is 480p as per the specs in the Barco 909 manual. |
For the video input card issue on the Electrohome Marquee, are you talking about ones with line doublers installed or their regular NTSC / Svideo ports? Or do you mean it processes all 480i sources poorly even if you use RGB?
I've been looking at a 9500 LC ultra with plans to use it's RGB BNC connectors for everything up to and including 1080p. My GPU has no HDCP issues when outputting Blu ray or streaming services via 1080p RGB so I wasn't planning to buy an HDMI card. If I can't bypass processing for 15khz content then I'd have to cross that option off the list. Same with the 909 as it can't do 15khz.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AnalogRocks Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 26706 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
TV/Projector: Sony 1252Q, AMPRO 4000G
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Get two, an old SONY for 480i(maybe 240p) and a 9" for everything else.
_________________ Tech support for nothing
CRT.
HD done right!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Curt Palme CRT Tech
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 24396 Location: Langley, BC
TV/Projector: All of them!
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Zebra wrote: |
I've been looking at a 9500 LC ultra with plans to use it's RGB BNC connectors for everything up to and including 1080p. My GPU has no HDCP issues when outputting Blu ray or streaming services via 1080p RGB so I wasn't planning to buy an HDMI card. If I can't bypass processing for 15khz content then I'd have to cross that option off the list. Same with the 909 as it can't do 15khz. |
the 9500 series had no option for internal line doublers, that was only Barco and Sony that offered those, and few were sold due to the price.
The 9500s I had here and way back when a lot of people were using composite inputs displayed a 480i picture just fine, but I remember the color and overall image being very poor at 480i when compared to other projectors displaying 480i.
I can't narrow it down any more than that sorry, it's been at least 10 years since I saw a E'home Marquee projector with a 480i input.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
banzairun
Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 129 Location: NJ
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2020 5:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
So you're just using a Playstation that you want to project? or are you using arcade guts?
Time Crisis deluxe (1-3) all used off-the-shelf consumer-grade 50" Mitsubishi PTVs. The game boards feed RGB to a S-video board for the PTV input, so many front projectors will be able to take that input directly. I've owned a pile of the arcade games and would usually just grab free/cheap mits sets to "retube" them, rather than actually retubing the sets, as I do with the Toshiba & Hitachi sets for Sega arcade games.
I wouldn't put much thought into which projector you use if you want to use a front projector to play around with. The shittier the projector, the less tight focus it will have, if that is what you are looking for, but the older projectors won't be as bright. The better the projector, the more space you'll have between the scan lines (projection CRTs don't have a dot-pitch, as previously stated), so this is why people used line doublers and scalers back in the day; it wasn't to "increase resolution" as some seem to think, since you can't actually do that. It just adds more scan lines to the image, meaning it's using more of the tube face, and hence more light thrown to the screen.
If you can find a Barco 7-series, those are probably the best 7" sets, are small and have good light output. You can directly feed a CRT projector (or your Ikegami) video from an arcade board as long as you use a level shifter PCB (games output 3-5vp-p and consumer gear expects .7vp-p signal levels). Sega made them for all their projection games, so they're pretty easy to source, or you can just use a Gonbes 8200 in the signal chain (they're junk, but are cheap and work). The Ike' might be okay with higher video input levels - some PVMs are OK with it, but it's better to level-shift it down to the standard level if possible.
You can always de-focus the image slightly if you're sensitive to how sharp the image looks. This is sometimes done with CRT projectors (particularly with the blue tube) just to brighten the image a little bit. You can do it with your Ikegamis as well if it's bugging you. If you have any Nanao monitors in your 27" games, those used the best tubes of anything you'll have around and they tend to last a while. K7000s look fine, but the Zenith tubes in most of them very commonly have soft focus and weak color guns - I've re-tubed probably 100 of them at this point from TV sets. The later ones with RCA tubes generally have good tubes.
For arcade monitors, the dot pitch on most tubes 25" and up will all be roughly the same, it was only often on the smaller tubes they actually made them with a finer dot pitch. 24kHz (medium resolution, or "EGA" from the PC-world) 19" arcade monitors used M48 CRTs instead of A48 CRTs, since the finer dot pitch of an M-series CRT makes a difference, but 25" medium res monitors all used the same standard A63-size CRT, no matter the resolution.
I guess I have some insight here as I've had a pile of CRT projectors and still have about 1000 arcade games, so I've mixed them together a few times over the last 25 years, but I generally just play with dedicated games these days, and don't even have a CRT PJ set up at the moment, even though I still have about a dozen sitting around.
Also, just FYI: your "29" monitors" are actually 27" (A68-size CRTs), we're in the USA, we measure viewable area, not total tube envelope size. Only Japan calls them 29s.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
barclay66
Joined: 27 Jun 2011 Posts: 1304 Location: Germany
TV/Projector: Marquee 9500 Ultra
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2020 2:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Curt Palme wrote: | | the 9500 series had no option for internal line doublers, that was only Barco and Sony that offered those, and few were sold due to the price. |
From Independence Day:
"Uh, excuse me. Mr. President? That's not entirely accurate."
- Nimziki reluctantly telling the truth on Area 51.
There is the Marquee Multi-standard Decoder which allows for displaying composite and S-video in various formats. Judging from the schematics, it does some kind of line doubling or de-interlacing using two programmable gate arrays and some memory.
Ah, and I have one...
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
97.75 KB |
| Viewed: |
9853 Time(s) |

|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Curt Palme CRT Tech
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 24396 Location: Langley, BC
TV/Projector: All of them!
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2020 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, that's definitely news to me! With every module I've had here, it was always set to 480i output, the scanning lines were REALLY clear on the screen.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tim in Phoenix
Joined: 21 Oct 2006 Posts: 4409 Location: Phoenix
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Guys
I have never heard mention of line doubling with Marquee decoders. Fire one up and look at ** for the scan rate. Likely 15.75.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|