| Author |
Message |
redfox001
Joined: 16 Mar 2009
Posts: 2257
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2015 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Francisco wrote: | | macgyver655 wrote: | | Diddern wrote: |
The latest test was a Barco 909 reality 98% perfect adjusted against a optoma91 and a jvc rs20.
To all people present the 909 had no chance. But the 909 was better than the optoma and the rs20 with total shutdown.
But every other aspect clear to the digitals, but why bother writing this you are a Crt fanboy...nothing I say will get into your head at all.
The only thing I say enjoy your barco marquee or what ever Crt you own but don't say its better because it's not. That story ended a long time ago. |
And your another one here who needs to shut the f*ck up. You have no credibility here what so ever. You came here to spew your so called knowledge which means sh*t to us. Your attempt to force your crap by insulting other members is nothing more then childish antics.
Many here have told you and told you and told you we do not give a sh*t of what you have to say.
You keep saying everyone can enjoy what they want and that is fine. Well apparently it is not fine or you would of shut your f*cking stupid sh*t mouth a long time ago.
You clearly do not know how to make friends.
You are a "Digital Fanboy" as you like to call it and that is just fine, but shut up already. CRT is a hobby here, get it. We don't care what you have to say. SO SHUT UP!
Do you go to vinyl forums and try to tell everyone that CD is superior? |
 
this is a good one | Quote: | | Do you go to vinyl forums and try to tell everyone that CD is superior? |
But please leave question mark away or he'll have to respond to that haha.
One thing I know is that one of his friends own a 909 maybe that's why he still follow a bit of the CRT nerds, fanboys, tinkerers |
He is in denial. Want to have a crt but denies it to himself shouting but my digital is better in every aspect! LOL
_________________
701s->runco933->8500ultra->cinemax->9500mp->919 splitpack + cinemax
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2015 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Diddern wrote: | | ElTopo wrote: | | Sorry to say but if someone say that an Optoma or RS20 is beating a 909 please put glasses on or check your eyes. |
Have you seen them side by side lol |
I have, smart guy. What's your point? Going to cry some more?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jeremy112
Joined: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 2649
Location: Fond du Lac, WI
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2015 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Diddern wrote: | | Jeremy112 wrote: | Also another thing I notice... Almost everyone here who compares CRT to digital is comparing a professional commercial grade CRT projector to a consumer grade digital.
A fair test would be putting a good commercial digital against the CRTs. Like a Christie or Barco for example  |
Your point make no sense. And I cant understand that I even take the energy to answer.
Why??? We talk about home cinema. Then we test the best crt for that purpose.
This crt vs digital was finished in 2004-2006. Up to that time the crt was the absolute best home cinema projector.
Today it's not and so far from also in 99% of all acspects possible in a picture HD 1080p
It just takes more time for some to realize it for some people.
We choose what we prefer best, but to say today that a crt is even close to
a good high end digital home cinema PJ Like a Sony vw1100 or a JVC x500,700,900 is so far from reality that it just get to
Stupid to say. You say it if you are a fan of crt or have not seen it on a real side by side test.
Will be the same to test a Barco 909 in a cinema for 500 people with the newest 4K Barco cinema PJ.
That would be fun? |
All I did was state my opinion. You didn't have to waste your effort and answer to my post, I never asked you to. Your entire response to my post is all over the place.
I wont waste as much text to answer back, but in my opinion you have no idea what the hell you are talking about. I don't think I'm alone on that one.
_________________
When I'm asking for a Model number, that doesn't mean I'm asking for a nude photo with your number on it 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mp20748
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 5689
Location: Maryland
TV/Projector: 9500LC Ultra / Super 02 and 03 VIM
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2015 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Diddern wrote: | | mp20748 wrote: | | Diddern wrote: |
Just proove me wrong.
Sorry my English Norwegian |
He's back..
You still boasting about that Non native rate projector and how great it supposed to be.
btw, there's nothing wrong with your english....but do think your eyes and thinking could use some attention. |
Here I go again lol.
Why every time I say the fact and my and many other have observed easy.
then there is something wrong with my eyes and that I am crazy. |
I'm only trying to help you. You keep coming here and stirring people up, and causing trouble.
I think if you follow my advice, they would at least have a better understanding on why you're here:
Click on the "Profile" link at the top of the page, and then put the following in your signature:
-- I'm a Hemorrhoid to this forum --
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
km987654
Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 2874
Location: Australia
TV/Projector: Barco BG809s
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2015 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Diddern wrote: | | Jeremy112 wrote: | Also another thing I notice... Almost everyone here who compares CRT to digital is comparing a professional commercial grade CRT projector to a consumer grade digital.
A fair test would be putting a good commercial digital against the CRTs. Like a Christie or Barco for example |
Your point make no sense. And I cant understand that I even take the energy to answer.
Why??? We talk about home cinema. Then we test the best crt for that purpose.
This crt vs digital was finished in 2004-2006. Up to that time the crt was the absolute best home cinema projector.
Today it's not and so far from also in 99% of all acspects possible in a picture HD 1080p
It just takes more time for some to realize it for some people.
We choose what we prefer best, but to say today that a crt is even close to
a good high end digital home cinema PJ Like a Sony vw1100 or a JVC x500,700,900 is so far from reality that it just get to
Stupid to say. You say it if you are a fan of crt or have not seen it on a real side by side test.
Will be the same to test a Barco 909 in a cinema for 500 people with the newest 4K Barco cinema PJ.
That would be fun? |
Talk is cheap and boring. Post images.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ElTopo
Joined: 07 Nov 2006
Posts: 1640
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2015 6:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
@diddern: I only use side by side in a 909 blend configuration 
_________________
Barco Cine 9 the one and only
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2015 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ElTopo wrote: | | @diddern: I only use side by side in a 909 blend configuration |
Side by side testing is only a point if you quickly change image. That was not a side by side test you saw at the blend with the x500.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
km987654
Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 2874
Location: Australia
TV/Projector: Barco BG809s
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2015 6:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Diddern wrote: | | ElTopo wrote: | | @diddern: I only use side by side in a 909 blend configuration |
Side by side testing is only a point if you quickly change image. That was not a side by side test you saw at the blend with the x500. |
Stop talking and post some wonderful digital images 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2015 6:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| km987654 wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | | ElTopo wrote: | | @diddern: I only use side by side in a 909 blend configuration |
Side by side testing is only a point if you quickly change image. That was not a side by side test you saw at the blend with the x500. |
Stop talking and post some wonderful digital images |
Lol
You are so sweet 😉
I see if I can find a image for you. But not now.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
km987654
Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 2874
Location: Australia
TV/Projector: Barco BG809s
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2015 7:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Diddern wrote: | | km987654 wrote: | | Diddern wrote: | | ElTopo wrote: | | @diddern: I only use side by side in a 909 blend configuration |
Side by side testing is only a point if you quickly change image. That was not a side by side test you saw at the blend with the x500. |
Stop talking and post some wonderful digital images |
Lol
You are so sweet 😉
I see if I can find a image for you. But not now. |
Looking forward to it. Don't leave it too long.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ElTopo
Joined: 07 Nov 2006
Posts: 1640
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kabuby77
Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 147
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2015 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
WW1100 is made for big screens. It's very sharp but it lacks in black performance.
If you you have fun doing comparisons, consider rather jvc or new epson laser projector
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2015 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kabuby77 wrote: | WW1100 is made for big screens. It's very sharp but it lacks in black performance.
If you you have fun doing comparisons, consider rather jvc or new epson laser projector |
Have a look at my avatar.
Vw1100, VW500 and the Jvc x500. Yes I do compartments a whole lot. And this is my hobby.
All kinds of digital and CRT s and the latest was a 909 vs jvc x500 but also cine9 and supermod Barco from Greg 808.
You Are right about the vw1100 in some areas but I use it at a 110 inch and 16fl is not to much. And if you accept that scenes form 0-4 ire is not 100% but get a kick ass picture at all from 5-100% and by far the best quality in picture form 5-100ire. But cost to much....
But compared to a jvc the sony lacks black correctly, trust me I check out the laser Epson. But I put money on that the jvc x500 and 700 beats it big. But I'll find out.
Remember I do not favor brand or tecnology I favor the best picture, and I do tests with many others present. Even Crt guys.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2015 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Diddern wrote: |
Have a look at my avatar.
|
If your avatar is any indication of your screen shots then don't waste our time cause you apparently do not know how to use a camera either.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
km987654
Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 2874
Location: Australia
TV/Projector: Barco BG809s
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2015 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Diddern wrote: | | kabuby77 wrote: | WW1100 is made for big screens. It's very sharp but it lacks in black performance.
If you you have fun doing comparisons, consider rather jvc or new epson laser projector |
Have a look at my avatar.
Vw1100, VW500 and the Jvc x500. Yes I do compartments a whole lot. And this is my hobby.
All kinds of digital and CRT s and the latest was a 909 vs jvc x500 but also cine9 and supermod Barco from Greg 808.
You Are right about the vw1100 in some areas but I use it at a 110 inch and 16fl is not to much. And if you accept that scenes form 0-4 ire is not 100% but get a kick ass picture at all from 5-100% and by far the best quality in picture form 5-100ire. But cost to much....
But compared to a jvc the sony lacks black correctly, trust me I check out the laser Epson. But I put money on that the jvc x500 and 700 beats it big. But I'll find out.
Remember I do not favor brand or tecnology I favor the best picture, and I do tests with many others present. Even Crt guys. |
Post images
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thewolfman
Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 1311
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 2:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Settle down.. settle down.. Just some soft CRT Baraka screenies over here.. nothing to see.. nothing to see. Move along.
| Description: |
| Black borders removed only. |
|
| Filesize: |
326.22 KB |
| Viewed: |
1936 Time(s) |
|
| Description: |
Black borders removed only.
Perhaps a slight red misalignment at the top though. |
|
| Filesize: |
371.9 KB |
| Viewed: |
1936 Time(s) |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
km987654
Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 2874
Location: Australia
TV/Projector: Barco BG809s
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 2:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Very Nice
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 7:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| km987654 wrote: | | Very Nice |
Jepp look nice, on picture.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thewolfman
Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 1311
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Diddern wrote: | | km987654 wrote: | | Very Nice |
Jepp look nice, on picture. |
I wanted to see if you had the balls to say it out load. That's all that little test was about.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013
Posts: 821
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 7:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| thewolfman wrote: | | Settle down.. settle down.. Just some soft CRT Baraka screenies over here.. nothing to see.. nothing to see. Move along. |
Crt with pixels?
| Description: |
|
Download |
| Filename: |
image.jpg |
| Filesize: |
199.1 KB |
| Downloaded: |
201 Time(s) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
