|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
stridsvognen Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 11:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wonder if a REC 2020 will be any real benefit.. first we need higher bit dept. And how much is needet to beat REC 709 8 bit. And i guess its all comes down to how much space we will have on disc, or the download time.
So if REC 2020 wont bring better color graduation, i would not care much.
For now i need a REC 601. REC 709. and PAL SECAM color profile to fit my different sources.. So im not in a hurry to wish for more.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Curt Palme CRT Tech
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 24396 Location: Langley, BC
TV/Projector: All of them!
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'll add my 2 cents here. I saw my first sony 4K projector yesterday at the customer that pulled out two Runco 1200s stacked on an approx 10' wide screen. He had the 1200s since about 2002 and judging from the lack of tube wear, I'm guessing he had 3000-4000 hours on them. His motivation for changing of course was lack of tweaking, as he brought a calibrator down from Michigan once a year.
Now, the source was 1080i component, as that's what the whole house was wired for back in 2002, I'l start another thread tonight on his whole house system.
He loved the 1200s, but ugraded about 3 months ago I think. We watched a few minutes of a football game. He's a big fan, and records every football game out there.
The Sony is the quietest digital I've ever (not) heard. I thought it didn't power up due to lack of noise, then I saw the pix out of it. Definitely a plus.
While I didn't notice this at CEDIA, his reds were off. They reminded me of old LCD projectors, where the red isn't bright, but a darker wine colored red. Totally annoying, but of course I did n't say anything.Considering I didn't see the same issue at CEDIA, , maybe it was this one projector, or something to do with the source.
Second, and more annoying was the misconvergence in the upper right corner. It wasn't mich, but I saw it at about 12' back. If I had bought the projector, I would have rejected it.
Also, the light areas were a bit washed out. again, could be a signal source, definitely an issue, but I didn't see this either at CEDIA.
My guess is that once he converts his HT to HDMI signal, the color issues will go away, leaving the convergence as a problem.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeremy112
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 2649 Location: Fond du Lac, WI
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You sure did Curt, 2 posts
_________________ When I'm asking for a Model number, that doesn't mean I'm asking for a nude photo with your number on it
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ElTopo
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1640
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1080i is not watchable on a Cine9 too many scanlines.
_________________ Barco Cine 9 the one and only
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HogPilot
Joined: 21 Jan 2010 Posts: 2383
TV/Projector: Vizio P702ui-B3, Pioneer Elite Pro-151FD & 111FD
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | I wonder if a REC 2020 will be any real benefit.. first we need higher bit dept. And how much is needet to beat REC 709 8 bit. And i guess its all comes down to how much space we will have on disc, or the download time.
So if REC 2020 wont bring better color graduation, i would not care much.
For now i need a REC 601. REC 709. and PAL SECAM color profile to fit my different sources.. So im not in a hurry to wish for more. |
You're completely right about REC.2020 needing a greater bit depth - this is why the specified bit depth is minimum 10 bits, and up to 12 bits. There is no such thing as 8 bit REC.2020. This is specifically because tests showed that a bit-depth of 8 bits was insufficient to prevent banding with REC.2020 - in fact, those same tests showed that a minimum of 11-bits was needed, so hopefully a 12-bit system standard is agreed upon.
I'd rather see us make progress in our color standards than shackle ourselves to older conventions simply because it's not convenient to have to have multiple profiles for material mastered in different ways.
_________________
| ecrabb wrote: | | Curt Palme wrote: | | Interesting, Mac isn't returning my emails. Go figure. |
He's mad at us for making Hog a moderator. He took his ball and went home.
SC |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013 Posts: 821 Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Curt Palme wrote: | I'll add my 2 cents here. I saw my first sony 4K projector yesterday at the customer that pulled out two Runco 1200s stacked on an approx 10' wide screen. He had the 1200s since about 2002 and judging from the lack of tube wear, I'm guessing he had 3000-4000 hours on them. His motivation for changing of course was lack of tweaking, as he brought a calibrator down from Michigan once a year.
Now, the source was 1080i component, as that's what the whole house was wired for back in 2002, I'l start another thread tonight on his whole house system.
He loved the 1200s, but ugraded about 3 months ago I think. We watched a few minutes of a football game. He's a big fan, and records every football game out there.
The Sony is the quietest digital I've ever (not) heard. I thought it didn't power up due to lack of noise, then I saw the pix out of it. Definitely a plus.
While I didn't notice this at CEDIA, his reds were off. They reminded me of old LCD projectors, where the red isn't bright, but a darker wine colored red. Totally annoying, but of course I did n't say anything.Considering I didn't see the same issue at CEDIA, , maybe it was this one projector, or something to do with the source.
Second, and more annoying was the misconvergence in the upper right corner. It wasn't mich, but I saw it at about 12' back. If I had bought the projector, I would have rejected it.
Also, the light areas were a bit washed out. again, could be a signal source, definitely an issue, but I didn't see this either at CEDIA.
My guess is that once he converts his HT to HDMI signal, the color issues will go away, leaving the convergence as a problem. |
Was this a VW1000 you saw?, and 1080i component is meaningless .
And convergence error on a VW1000 definitive a DOA.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Curt Palme CRT Tech
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 24396 Location: Langley, BC
TV/Projector: All of them!
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I would assume it was, he just bought it, and it's a 4K projector. I do understand that component 1080i is meaningless and pointless, that's why I mentioned it, as that's how his HT is wired. He will change it down the road he says.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013 Posts: 821 Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2013 6:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Curt Palme wrote: | | I would assume it was, he just bought it, and it's a 4K projector. I do understand that component 1080i is meaningless and pointless, that's why I mentioned it, as that's how his HT is wired. He will change it down the road he says. |
A Sony Vw1000 is almost the size of a barco 701 if not not a Vw1000. Hehe
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ElTopo
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1640
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Watched some demo stuff on a sony 4K tv today.
3840 x 2160p
Very impressive but still the lack of film content.
_________________ Barco Cine 9 the one and only
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013 Posts: 821 Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ElTopo wrote: | Watched some demo stuff on a sony 4K tv today.
3840 x 2160p
Very impressive but still the lack of film content. |
The benefit of the a 4k projector and tv today is the uppscaling to 4k.
I have tried native 4k home and tested with same movie in 1080p( timescapes )
And the vw1000 makes bluray so close to 4k that its more than enough for me.
That's why i mean its meaningless to compare this machine with a 909 or 909s combined together in stack or a Crt.
Not that this will be stunning, but pointless compared. Everybody have what they want, and today no projector is 100% perfect but close and then you have to pay to get the little extra.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ElTopo
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1640
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
The question for me is if it makes sense to:
1) downscale 4K material to 2 K (Blu-Ray)
2) upscale the compressed 2K material again to 4K
ElTopo
_________________ Barco Cine 9 the one and only
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013 Posts: 821 Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 10:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ElTopo wrote: | The question for me is if it makes sense to:
1) downscale 4K material to 2 K (Blu-Ray)
2) upscale the compressed 2K material again to 4K
ElTopo |
The vw1000 and the vw500 show 4k resolution on the screen always. When you have a real 4k mashine you Get real 4k. Now only possible real 4k is from a computer or
A Sony 4k puck or redray. This 4k format as Sony sayed to me is not yet decided what kind of format it will be.
That's why Sony have the 4K native player for now. Because of extreamly big files and want to show that they have 4k for the public.
But hopefully it will be a resolution later that makes the files smaller and fit on some sort
Of disk. That is not yet decided what to use. But next year something hopefully will happend.
In the Sony vw500 and the vw1000 there are a very god scaler and a Reality creation that brings back the loss of compressed blueray. There is a new setting in the vw500 that is mastered in 4 K. And this is spesialy for the mastred in 4K movies that's for sale now.
But I have to say that a blueray have a facelift close to 4k with the vw1000.
The upgrade later will bring the same to my vw1000.
So yes better bluray close but not the same as 4K native.
I have seen both.
So no downscaling. To 2k only the other way.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thewolfman
Joined: 28 Mar 2011 Posts: 1311 Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Next year JVC will have their first 4K projector out. I'll bet they call it 8K for their use of e-shift.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013 Posts: 821 Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 6:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| thewolfman wrote: | Next year JVC will have their first 4K projector out. I'll bet they call it 8K for their use of e-shift.  |
They call a 1080P projector now for 4K, and have nothing to do with 4K. Nothing.
Next year also possible that JVC brand becomes Kenwood
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ElTopo
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1640
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2013 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Watched "After Earth" blu-ray on my Cine9 and have to say once again that this maschine is the absolute reference when it comes to picture quality.
Projectors i had in the past: BG801s, Barco 701, Barco Cine7, BG808, Barco Cine8, Marquee9500LC Ultra
Got also some impressions from actual projector line ups like JVC but none of these can compare.
Have to see the Sony VW1000/1100 and the VW500......
BTW: movie was bad
_________________ Barco Cine 9 the one and only
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013 Posts: 821 Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2013 10:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ElTopo wrote: | Watched "After Earth" blu-ray on my Cine9 and have to say once again that this maschine is the absolute reference when it comes to picture quality.
Projectors i had in the past: BG801s, Barco 701, Barco Cine7, BG808, Barco Cine8, Marquee9500LC Ultra
Got also some impressions from actual projector line ups like JVC but none of these can compare.
Have to see the Sony VW1000/1100 and the VW500......
BTW: movie was bad |
Good to hear that you are satisfied with your Cine9, and you should be.
But sorry once again that this machine is the absolute reference when it comes to picture quality, is 100% wrong...
But "YOU" can mean that is okey. If you had a side by side test, you will se how much better a god digital is today.
And like this forum topic, no match..... vw1000 in a total different league....
You can say what you want, but a CRT today have noting to do with reference picture quality.. But your cine9 "best when it comes to a CRT" in my eyes.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ElTopo
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1640
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2013 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
As i wrote i have to see the VW1000 and VW500 hopefully soon....
And until then the Cine9 is reference
_________________ Barco Cine 9 the one and only
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013 Posts: 821 Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2013 10:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ElTopo wrote: | As i wrote i have to see the VW1000 and VW500 hopefully soon....
And until then the Cine9 is reference  |
Does not matter you have the CRT glases on and even if vw1000000 comes in 30 years
You still have your CRT 😂.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stridsvognen Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2013 11:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ElTopo wrote: | Watched "After Earth" blu-ray on my Cine9 and have to say once again that this maschine is the absolute reference when it comes to picture quality.
Projectors i had in the past: BG801s, Barco 701, Barco Cine7, BG808, Barco Cine8, Marquee9500LC Ultra
Got also some impressions from actual projector line ups like JVC but none of these can compare.
Have to see the Sony VW1000/1100 and the VW500......
BTW: movie was bad |
Its your preference.. the SONY G90 and the Marquee 9500LC both have better bandwidth performance from what i have seen.
So i wonder a bit what it is that the Barco 909 is douing right.? Its clearly not fine details and ansi contrast on fine details.
Can you describe a bit more about the differences, and what its douing better.. document it with some screenshots maybe.?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Diddern
Joined: 02 Jun 2013 Posts: 821 Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2013 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| stridsvognen wrote: | | ElTopo wrote: | Watched "After Earth" blu-ray on my Cine9 and have to say once again that this maschine is the absolute reference when it comes to picture quality.
Projectors i had in the past: BG801s, Barco 701, Barco Cine7, BG808, Barco Cine8, Marquee9500LC Ultra
Got also some impressions from actual projector line ups like JVC but none of these can compare.
Have to see the Sony VW1000/1100 and the VW500......
BTW: movie was bad |
Its your preference.. the SONY G90 and the Marquee 9500LC both have better bandwidth performance from what i have seen.
So i wonder a bit what it is that the Barco 909 is douing right.? Its clearly not fine details and ansi contrast on fine details.
Can you describe a bit more about the differences, and what its douing better.. document it with some screenshots maybe.? |
In my appinion a cine9 is the best CRT ever made, but I have not seen them together in a side by side test.
And it depends how good you are with adjustments and picture adjustments.
But you can be right, not my aria. I like to see screenshot of the cine9 bandwidth, but I think that if a marquee should have a chance it have to be the Lc ultra verson.
But again have not seen them in the same room.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|