| Author |
Message |
Zerog
Joined: 05 Jan 2013 Posts: 35 Location: Southern California
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Greetings!
Yes, it does have a 4 pin device there. Looks like it says KIA 578 but nothing comes up for me when I search it. Also in the second pic you can see a bridge rectifier KBU 804 below the fuses, FWIW.
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
51.23 KB |
| Viewed: |
13516 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
43.98 KB |
| Viewed: |
13516 Time(s) |

|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Ok, so it does have it. Then you should of had +5v on pins 4 and 5 at BN94 which, according to your chart you did not. Set your DMM to diode scale and see if there is a short between any pins of that ic91.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zerog
Joined: 05 Jan 2013 Posts: 35 Location: Southern California
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| macgyver655 wrote: | | Ok, so it does have it. Then you should of had +5v on pins 4 and 5 at BN94 which, according to your chart you did not. Set your DMM to diode scale and see if there is a short between any pins of that ic91. |
So this testing is done in circuit? The two outer pins show voltage in one direction, none in the other. The center two pins show voltage each way, and the pin nearest the outside of the board shows voltage in both directions with the two center pins.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Yes, test in circuit for now. Set you DMM to diode scale. Touch the 2 leads together and look at the meters display. That is a short reading. Now, testing the ic leads look for a reading close to the meters short reading.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zerog
Joined: 05 Jan 2013 Posts: 35 Location: Southern California
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| macgyver655 wrote: | | Yes, test in circuit for now. Set you DMM to diode scale. Touch the 2 leads together and look at the meters display. That is a short reading. Now, testing the ic leads look for a reading close to the meters short reading. |
I have two different meters that sometimes confuse me as to which one is accurate. But I did this several times and 3 of the pins do go to 000 in a few seconds.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Then it's probably bad. If you want to double check pins 4 and 5 on BN94 again for 5v you can.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zerog
Joined: 05 Jan 2013 Posts: 35 Location: Southern California
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm willing to just replace it while I have the thing apart. It's relatively easy to get to.
However...
The part number is KIA578R050FP/PI. I haven't found it anywhere yet. NTE has no direct cross-reference. I have the data sheet from the manufacturer KEC. (The unit was made in China).
One issue is that it's a 4-pin T022 package where most equivalents are 3 pin.
Can you recommend a source?
Thanks
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Call Marantz parts at: (201) 762-6392
Select parts dept..
Give them this part number: 90M-HC300990R
They do have stock and they are $12.80 each and $7.00 shipping.
Also be aware that you may have another problem that caused this part to fail. I usually order more then 1 part but these are a little pricy. Of course you could probably Ebay any left over parts, especially since this is such a rare part.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Oh, I forgot. I put in a request to 1 of my China suppliers but I wont have an answer until later today. If they have stock it may be cheap but it takes around 2 weeks to get parts.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zerog
Joined: 05 Jan 2013 Posts: 35 Location: Southern California
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the research. I've been doing likewise. I just chatted with Mouser over a substitute, and they have a 4 pin T022 with exposed heat sink by Sharp still in stock. 5V, 7A output. The original was 5V 5A.
I'll try to attache the html file for it, see if it works.
They're $3 each. I have other things I can order as well to accommodate shipping costs. If it will substitute, I would feel a whole lot better blowing a $3 part than a $13 part.
What do you think? There's also a 5V 3A part made by Fairchild, but I'm concerned with going low on the current.\
| Description: |
|
 Download |
| Filename: |
Sharp Regulator.pdf |
| Filesize: |
247.71 KB |
| Downloaded: |
706 Time(s) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zerog
Joined: 05 Jan 2013 Posts: 35 Location: Southern California
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's the actual datasheet. Doesn't look like the Sharp accepts as high an input voltage as the KEC (original).
But the point is to use it to make sure that there aren't other issues causing a problem, so if it lasts long enough to power up and test the unit for a while then the exorbitantly priced original can be ordered from Marantz.
| Description: |
|
 Download |
| Filename: |
pq5ev3_e.pdf |
| Filesize: |
65.85 KB |
| Downloaded: |
779 Time(s) |
| Description: |
|
 Download |
| Filename: |
KIA578R050PI.pdf |
| Filesize: |
772.4 KB |
| Downloaded: |
633 Time(s) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nashou66
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 16171 Location: West Seneca NY
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 10:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The 3 amp device is no good. You can up the amps but not lower.
The Sharp device is 7 amp but the input voltage max is 7v and that's not enough. The circuit supply is +8v.
Funny thing is that because of the circuit design you can use a standard 3 leg regulator. The on/off leg is just tied on all the time. You just have to get the correct leg on the right hole and be able to mount it to the heat sink.
Or you can wait until I hear back from my China supplier.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zerog
Joined: 05 Jan 2013 Posts: 35 Location: Southern California
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
OK, next possibility!
I removed IC91 and took it and the data sheet for it to a local electronics surplus store. The proprietor is pretty sharp and has always been helpful. I removed it to test it more thoroughly. It does show values in one direction but open in the other direction, FWIW.
The proprietor checked out the IC91 data sheet and then looked up the data sheet for this regulator: SG29055A by Microsemi. It's a 5 pin regulator, but by removing the 5th pin, it appears to have very similar tolerances to the original IC91.
Data sheet is attached. I thought it would be wise to have a consensus before I installed it.
Thanks for checking this out!
| Description: |
|
 Download |
| Filename: |
Microsemi SG29055A.pdf |
| Filesize: |
253.24 KB |
| Downloaded: |
603 Time(s) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
First I'm going to ask if he verified that ic was bad.
Second I'm going to ask if you see a problem with that replacement.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zerog
Joined: 05 Jan 2013 Posts: 35 Location: Southern California
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I asked him if he would check it for me, and he said that it couldn't be checked out of circuit without a specific kind of testing circuit, since it was an IC.
Did I see something wrong with it? The input and output voltage seems to be in range and the pin-out matches the old one. One issue is that it has a metal-backing for ground, so it needs to be insulated from the heat sink. I do have an insulator.
I'm not totally sure the old one is bad. That's why I took it with me in the first place. I'm not sure the readings I was getting are consistent. I took readings of both the original KEC and this SG for comparison. The readings don't make lots of sense to me on the new one. They match the old one when the black lead is on pin 4, but nothing when reversed. I did put a fresh battery into my meter, fwiw.
OLD KEC
Pin 1 & 4 (black) = (open) Pin 1 & 4 (red) = (open)
Pin 1 & 2 (black) = (open) Pin 1 & 2 (red) = (725)
Pin 1 & 3 (black) = (open) Pin 1 & 3 (red) = (920)
Pin 2 & 3 (black) = (open) Pin 2 & 3 (red) = (925)
Pin 3 & 4 (black) = (1050) Pin 3 & 4 (red) = (open)
open =1
NEW SG
Pin 1 & 4 (black) = (open) Pin 1 & 4 (red) = (open)
Pin 1 & 2 (black) = (open) Pin 1 & 2 (red) = (open)
Pin 1 & 3 (black) = (open) Pin 1 & 3 (red) = (open)
Pin 2 & 3 (black) = (open) Pin 2 & 3 (red) = (open)
Pin 3 & 4 (black) = (1050) Pin 3 & 4 (red) = (open)
Could that be right for the new one? Seems odd that so many open readings.
Meter shows a short between pin 3 and the metal tab, which should be ground. Meter shows reading between tab and pin 4.
But no reading between pin 3 and 4.
Comment, please?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
You called me Curt in that email you sent, lol. Was it meant for me or for Curt?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zerog
Joined: 05 Jan 2013 Posts: 35 Location: Southern California
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 6:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oops, Sorry - I thought your name was Curt. Apologies for the mistake to both of you.
In the email I was trying to that verify with you the line between being helpful and hindering the expert.
I appreciate your help and would like to facilitate matters if at all possible.
As far as the
Marantz is concerned....Do you think the original IC91 might still be good?
Last edited by Zerog on Wed Jan 09, 2013 6:36 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nashou66
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 16171 Location: West Seneca NY
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macgyver655
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 8508
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Both the SG29055A and the KA78R05 are only 1 amp devices. We need 5 amp. Even with no problem at all it would blow those 1 amp parts.
However, we need to do some more testing before any parts are ordered. It has not been confirmed that the ic91 is bad. Those number are not bad but still doesn't mean it may be failing under load.
What I would do next is check for a short to gnd on the reg board without ic91 being installed. You would need to test between contact points of pin 2 and 3 on the board where the pins would be. DMM on diode scale. But, all wiring harnesses need to be connected but do not plug in the receiver.
Just give me the numbers. i don't need to know what lead was where.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|