| Author |
Message |
Spanky Ham
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 5643
Location: Comedy Central
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 3:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| gjaky wrote: | Why would anyone do that?
Here Spanky Ham posted a screenshot of 1600*1200 with his BR909, I think that would be the only machine which could resolve 2048*1536 the most. |
Those 909s are gone, so no more testing for me. I only have a G90 now.
On CRT monitors and pjs, it is my understanding that there weren't a lot of high bandwidth chips that could be used in pjs.
On 1080i/96, you guys might want to try the oval method to reduce scan line visibility. Mark_A_W and Person99 swore by it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
km987654
Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 2874
Location: Australia
TV/Projector: Barco BG809s
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 6:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Spanky Ham wrote: | | gjaky wrote: | Why would anyone do that?
Here Spanky Ham posted a screenshot of 1600*1200 with his BR909, I think that would be the only machine which could resolve 2048*1536 the most. |
Those 909s are gone, so no more testing for me. I only have a G90 now.
On CRT monitors and pjs, it is my understanding that there weren't a lot of high bandwidth chips that could be used in pjs.
On 1080i/96, you guys might want to try the oval method to reduce scan line visibility. Mark_A_W and Person99 swore by it. |
I recall that score. Did you keep the G90 Because it was somehow better than the 909?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Spanky Ham
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 5643
Location: Comedy Central
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
This is probably for another thread and since it will probably be flame ridden I will put it there.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ecrabb
Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Posts: 15909
Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 8:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Spanky Ham wrote: | | This is probably for another thread and since it will probably be flame ridden I will put it there. |
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
benareeno
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 1614
Location: ottawa, canada
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 3:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
when trying 48Hz...give it a good try, not just a few minutes, and if you're using an htpc..then don't let the desktop fool you.
But...if you run a high contrast value, you will see more flicker....but, still not objectionable after a few minutes.
I run low contrast setting, so I think this is a factor as to why I can run 48Hz and it still looks good to me.
But...before you judge, watch for a long enough interval to be sure. I find 48Hz yields a nicer picture...seemingly sharper.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CIR Engineering
Joined: 25 Aug 2008
Posts: 4269
Location: Chicago USA & Berlin Germany
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Spanky Ham wrote: | | gjaky wrote: | Why would anyone do that?
Here Spanky Ham posted a screenshot of 1600*1200 with his BR909, I think that would be the only machine which could resolve 2048*1536 the most. |
On 1080i/96, you guys might want to try the oval method to reduce scan line visibility. Mark_A_W and Person99 swore by it. |
Or try the oval method with blue elliptical only, keeping red and green round. I always found that I like this best.
craigr
_________________
JETI 1501-HiRes 2nm Spectroradiometer
JETI 1211 Spectroradiometer
Photo Research PR-650 Spectroradiometer
Klein K10-A Colorimeter
Murideo Fresco SIX-G HDMI 2.x Multimedia Generator
Murideo Fresco SIX-A HDMI 2.x Analyzer
Light Illusion ColourSpace XPT Color Calibration Software
Light Illusion LightSpace XPT Pro Version 10.x Color Calibration Software
OMARDRIS JVC Software Patch to use K10-A and Jeti with JVC OEM AutoCal Software!
Sencore CR7000 CRT Tube Analyzer / Rejuvenater
Authorized Dealer for Lumagen & just about everything worth buying 
www.CIR-Engineering.com - craigr@cir-engineering.com
Phone: 865-405-6892
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
