Return to the CurtPalme.com main site CurtPalme.com Home Theater Forum
A forum with a sense of fun and community for Home Theater enthusiasts!
Products for Sale ] [ FAQ: Hooking it all up ] [ CRT Primer/FAQ ] [ Best/Worst CRT Projectors List ] [ Setup Tips & Manuals ] [ Advanced Procedures ] [ Newsletter ]
 

Blu-ray disc release list and must-have titles. Buy the latest and best Blu-ray titles to show off in your home theater!

 As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! 

Barco port 3 vs port 4/5 experiences.

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors
Author Message
Decibel



Joined: 31 May 2007
Posts: 904
Location: Roma - Italia

Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 2:27 pm    Post subject: Barco port 3 vs port 4/5 experiences.

I finally mounted my modded BG808@808s LC in his place.

I had big problems in geometry because the projector (then images) had mysterious raster distorsions.
Now I definitively made the choice to switch the video signal through port 3 then the problems are finally solved.
Please tell your experiences.

_________________
Domenico (Barco fan!)
Back to top
View user's photo album (3 photos)
km987654



Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 2874
Location: Australia

TV/Projector: Barco BG809s

Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 10:35 am    Post subject: Re: Barco port 3 vs port 4/5 experiences.

Decibel wrote:
I finally mounted my modded BG808@808s LC in his place.

I had big problems in geometry because the projector (then images) had mysterious raster distorsions.
Now I definitively made the choice to switch the video signal through port 3 then the problems are finally solved.
Please tell your experiences.


Did you notice any differnece in picture quality particularly colour depth. I have both ports running and from time to time I switch to port 3 to see what the image is like and it seems that colour depth is not as good as port 5.


Just an edit to this post. After changing resolution and refresh rates I would have say its possible to get a sharper and even better image on Port 3. I am using a DAC that is attached directly to the Port 3 connector so there is no analog cable.


Last edited by km987654 on Wed Nov 14, 2012 12:51 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
ElTopo



Joined: 07 Nov 2006
Posts: 1640


Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 10:50 am    Post subject:

Port5 should be much better!

It's said that picture quality of port3 is not as good as of port5.

ElTopo

_________________
Barco Cine 9 the one and only
Back to top
kal
Forum Administrator


Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Posts: 18114
Location: Ottawa, Canada

TV/Projector: JVC DLA-NZ7

Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 12:34 pm    Post subject:

You can read a summary of what to expect here:

http://www.curtpalme.com/Barco_Port3_Input.shtm

Sometimes port 5 is better, sometimes port 3. Depends on the model of projector. It's not black and white. There's no "one" answer.

Kal

_________________

Support our site by using our affiliate links. We thank you!
My basement/HT/bar/brewery build 2.0
Back to top
View user's photo album (18 photos)
RaWsHaRk



Joined: 01 May 2009
Posts: 131
Location: Finland

Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 5:21 pm    Post subject:

on my 801s bd the port 3 is definitely better one.
_________________
Electrohome Marquee 7500.
Back to top
ElTopo



Joined: 07 Nov 2006
Posts: 1640


Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 7:46 pm    Post subject:

I think beginning with BG808s port5 should be better.

ElTopo

_________________
Barco Cine 9 the one and only
Back to top
Ile



Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 1491
Location: Jyväskylä, Finland

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 11:31 am    Post subject:

808/1209 s-series projectors port3 is worse in all aspect. Colors, sharpness and ringing at higher resolutions.
In theory first stage are 500Mhz vs 5GHZ and second stage 200MHz vs 850MHz.
Port3 also goes through two more stages, 1GHZ and 850 MHz.
It's also use one sided through hole pcb, that is noisier than two sided smd board in port5.

In older sets there have been reported differences to both ways, even both inputs use similar differential design and same crappy switching/universal transistors for video. (BSX20 and 2N2905A)
Port3 signal way have one stage more, 2N2905A (200MHz).

Port3 have too much peaking, so with higher resolutions it looks worse because there is more ringing. With ES set this doesn't matter, because tubes can't focus to those high resolutions anyway.

At some point (could be related to s-series) they have been chanced port3 buffer transistors BSX20 (500MHz) to 2N2369A (675MHz). This little extra BW might help little, but next stage is still same crappy 200MHz so can't be huge difference.
Back to top
BASPARLEUR



Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Posts: 18
Location: MAURITIUS

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 5:41 am    Post subject:

hi
it's right . but if we consider the bandwith of rgb output amplifier (120 mhz - 3 db ) , the interest of 5G bw is relative ! and what is the bw of your bd drive , or your scaler ?

however , rgb2 is particulary good for upgrade : we change all transistors and capacity . a new power supply , with very , very low noise increase dramatically the black level and the video noise ; the digital/analog converter ( moome v3 vith a new improved power or hd fury 4 ) is mechanical coupled with rgb2 for minimise lenght of analog video signal (we enter directly with hdmi on earth ) the signal is not routing on the frame . the end of this : port 5 is good , but vs a improved rgb2 , the result is really incredible , because the signal way is ultra short with only 3 stage when port 5 offer very long way and not necessary conversions at signal + very noisy supply + crossing frame signal !!!

you want more at: axel55@free.fr

sorry , i new in this forum and mp not active at this time .

best regards
Back to top
Ile



Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 1491
Location: Jyväskylä, Finland

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 7:10 am    Post subject:

5GHz is not ultimate goal for front end cards, higher you go more noise you get.
But original 200MHz transistors with too much peaking aren't good for 1080p/72Hz, it ring and is bit soft.

I chanced those to 1.2GHz video transistors in input and driver boards in my BG1200 and also removed some peaking. Much sharper result without ringing. Then I also chanced 180MHz end stages to neck boards, this gives also more sharpness. Then I cleaned power rails to minimize noise. I have also played with dvi and MP rgb pcb's in place of port3 board, but still you have to pass one original stage at switcher board that's not that great.
Back to top
BASPARLEUR



Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Posts: 18
Location: MAURITIUS

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 8:33 am    Post subject:

hi ; you are right and you are experimented . it's a pleasure to converse with you . it's damage our respective location are so long ! it was interesting to compare we mods .
best
Back to top
Decibel



Joined: 31 May 2007
Posts: 904
Location: Roma - Italia

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 8:43 am    Post subject:

I would to be a betatester!!!!!!!

muahahhahahahha

_________________
Domenico (Barco fan!)
Back to top
View user's photo album (3 photos)
Ile



Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 1491
Location: Jyväskylä, Finland

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 10:53 am    Post subject: Re: Barco port 3 vs port 4/5 experiences.

Decibel wrote:
I finally mounted my modded BG808@808s LC in his place.

I had big problems in geometry because the projector (then images) had mysterious raster distorsions.
Now I definitively made the choice to switch the video signal through port 3 then the problems are finally solved.
Please tell your experiences.

My guess is that your source might have "wrong" timings or positive sync that port3 board is repairing. There is sync conversion and horizontal sync width manipulation (chanced to 1/13th of line period) on port3 board.

If this is case, different timings from source should allow using port5.
Back to top
Ile



Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 1491
Location: Jyväskylä, Finland

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:14 am    Post subject:

BASPARLEUR wrote:
hi ; you are right and you are experimented . it's a pleasure to converse with you . it's damage our respective location are so long ! it was interesting to compare we mods .
best
It seems that least two old threads about my 120* mods seem to be lost at some point. I have also sold some of my modded 120* boards, when I chanced to my current BG808sLC.
Back to top
gjaky



Joined: 05 Jun 2010
Posts: 2802
Location: Budapest, Hungary

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:30 am    Post subject:

Are 120MHz neck boards are using VPA06s or what? The NEC PG xtra neckboards have VPA13-s however it is "just" a 130MHz chip, but it can stand 120V supply compared to VPA18.
_________________
projectors in the past : NEC 6-9PG xtra, Electrohome Marquee 6-7500, NEC XG 1351 LC ( with super modified Electrohome VNB neckboard !!!)
current: VDC Marquee 9500LC
The MOD: VNB-DB, VIM-DB
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
barclay66



Joined: 27 Jun 2011
Posts: 1304
Location: Germany

TV/Projector: Marquee 9500 Ultra

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 2:03 pm    Post subject:

Hi,

120MHz neck boards (like on the BG 1209s) use the VPH08. VCCmax of this part is 230V and it is specified for 80MHz. So I would assume they did some tweaking.

By the way:
The naming/numbering of the video packs says it all.
VPH -> High voltage, VPA -> Mid voltage.
Numbers indicate the bandwith: 06 -> 60MHz, 08 -> 80 MHz, 18 -> 180 MHz


Regards,
barclay66
Back to top
View user's photo album (25 photos)
gjaky



Joined: 05 Jun 2010
Posts: 2802
Location: Budapest, Hungary

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 2:15 pm    Post subject:

barclay66 wrote:
Hi,

120MHz neck boards (like on the BG 1209s) use the VPH08. VCCmax of this part is 230V and it is specified for 80MHz. So I would assume they did some tweaking.

By the way:
The naming/numbering of the video packs says it all.
VPH -> High voltage, VPA -> Mid voltage.
Numbers indicate the bandwith: 06 -> 60MHz, 08 -> 80 MHz, 18 -> 180 MHz


Regards,
barclay66


Some of them have different gain factor, so random replacement not always a good idea.

_________________
projectors in the past : NEC 6-9PG xtra, Electrohome Marquee 6-7500, NEC XG 1351 LC ( with super modified Electrohome VNB neckboard !!!)
current: VDC Marquee 9500LC
The MOD: VNB-DB, VIM-DB
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
barclay66



Joined: 27 Jun 2011
Posts: 1304
Location: Germany

TV/Projector: Marquee 9500 Ultra

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 2:25 pm    Post subject:

gjaky wrote:
Some of them have different gain factor, so random replacement not always a good idea.


Of course. My information wasn't meant as a replacement guide. I saw it on the datasheets and thought it might be interesting. The circuit around the video packs usually is tailored to meet their specs, so there's no easy drop-in replacement...

Regards,
barclay66
Back to top
View user's photo album (25 photos)
Ile



Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 1491
Location: Jyväskylä, Finland

Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:16 pm    Post subject:

gjaky wrote:
Are 120MHz neck boards are using VPA06s or what? The NEC PG xtra neckboards have VPA13-s however it is "just" a 130MHz chip, but it can stand 120V supply compared to VPA18.

75MHz (801s/808) use VPH06 and newer VPJ06.

old 120MHz (1200, 1208, 1209) use two VPA13 in push/pull with 110V supply.
I modded these with two VPA18 with 88V supply.

new 120MHz (BG808s, cine8, 1209s) use VPJ08.
Back to top
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum