Return to the CurtPalme.com main site CurtPalme.com Home Theater Forum
A forum with a sense of fun and community for Home Theater enthusiasts!
Products for Sale ] [ FAQ: Hooking it all up ] [ CRT Primer/FAQ ] [ Best/Worst CRT Projectors List ] [ Setup Tips & Manuals ] [ Advanced Procedures ] [ Newsletter ]
 

Blu-ray disc release list and must-have titles. Buy the latest and best Blu-ray titles to show off in your home theater!

 As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! 

Everything you want to know about Frankenyokes in one shot!
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 17, 18, 19 ... 35, 36, 37  Next
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors
Author Message
cmjohnson



Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 5180
Location: Buried under G90s

Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 9:54 pm    Post subject:

The extra set of rings (which have no color code on them or adjustment screw) are not magnetized. They will do nothing.


I've successfully turned "blank" CPC rings into fully functional 6-pole rings, done first by erasing whatever field may be in them with a
bulk tape eraser, and then applying six pairs of 1/4" diameter supermagnets to the CPC ring pair, spaced evenly, alternating polarity, and letting the mess sit for a while. A day is good. Then remove the magnets without letting them slip toward any other magnets, and you should have a good working set of 6-pole rings.

Collect all the 2-pole (flare only) and 2,4 pole (flare and astig) CPC assemblies you can find. Rebuild them into 2,4,6 pole sets after
remagnetizing the spare flare set to be 6-pole pairs.



Incidentally, the K-D magnetic assemblies consist of TWO alnico magnets (they look like metal) and all other components in them are
made of ferrite. There's a reasonable chance that a ferrite supplier can reproduce those additional rings and discs for not a great deal of
money as they're molded and pressed. They might even be stock shapes. Hope so. Then it gets pretty cheap to have them made.


CJ
Back to top
garyfritz



Joined: 08 Apr 2006
Posts: 12088
Location: Fort Collins, CO

Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 10:00 pm    Post subject:

cmjohnson wrote:
The extra set of rings (which have no color code on them or adjustment screw) are not magnetized. They will do nothing.

I was afraid of that. Ohwell, nice idea.

Would you assume the 3-ring sets are 4-/6-pole rings?
Back to top
tse



Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 1014
Location: Sweatbucket, Fl.

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 2:06 am    Post subject:

The focus mags with the "+10" sticker are from an Ampro projector. The other probably is, too. The ones with stickers have been re-gaussed from the standard strength. Ampro had a couple of different focus boards with slightly different static focus adjustment capabilities. You can only try them and see if they work.

There were no special rings that were used with either type of mag. Some were 2 and 4 pole, some were 2, 4, and 6 pole.

Scott

_________________
"Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we would soon want bread."

Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
cmjohnson



Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 5180
Location: Buried under G90s

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 4:55 am    Post subject:

The extra rings are not magnetized, but I stress, they CAN BE magnetized. Get some 1/4" diameter neodymium disc magnets and have at it.

If you wish to image the magnetic pattern on the ring, go to ebay and get a small bottle of ferrofluid and a petri dish. It's a very sensitive
way to image magnetic fields.

You can make your own ferrofluid if you wish, by letting a piece of steel wool rust in a jar full of water. Grind it up frequently and after a few weeks,
you'll have iron oxide powder so find it'll float in air after you evaporate the water from the jar. Add that to some lightweight oil and you've got yourself some ferrofluid for imaging magnetic fields.


CJ
Back to top
garyfritz



Joined: 08 Apr 2006
Posts: 12088
Location: Fort Collins, CO

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:46 am    Post subject:

I'll see if I can figure these things out on the tubes before I try tearing them apart to suss them out with ferrofluid or remagnetize them. With luck they are 4/6 poles and I can center by rotating the KF2211's. If they're 4/6 poles I might keep them even if I go back to the Thompsons.

So with the KF2211's, should I pull the stig board? Or just leave it alone?
Back to top
tse



Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 1014
Location: Sweatbucket, Fl.

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 2:59 pm    Post subject:

It won't hurt anything to leave the stig waveform board in place. Probably the best bet.

The rings should be 2 pole, 2 pole and 4 pole, or 2, 4, 6 pole.

Just tighten the mags on the tube neck and use the projector position controls to center the raster. Even though the control is accessed in the convergence section it is really using the deflection circuits to move the image. It doesn't overload the convergence circuits.

Scott

_________________
"Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we would soon want bread."

Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
garyfritz



Joined: 08 Apr 2006
Posts: 12088
Location: Fort Collins, CO

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 4:01 pm    Post subject:

Really?? Hm. When I first set up my 8500 the mount was wrong, and it was shooting way high. I had to use the position controls to move the raster down (up on the tubes) to put the image onto my screen. The convergence didn't seem to be very stable with that setup. When I modified my mount so I could use a centered raster, the convergence seemed to get a lot more stable. I figured the less you had to do with the centering, the better?
Back to top
garyfritz



Joined: 08 Apr 2006
Posts: 12088
Location: Fort Collins, CO

Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 4:32 am    Post subject:

I finished wiring up the FYokeI's and went to put them on the 8500, when I suddenly realized I wasn't quite sure which was fore and aft. Smile I assume the "label" side faces aft, toward the VNB, and the side with the little compression neck and the long screw-hose-clamp-thingie (technical term Laughing) faces toward the bell? And presumably the hose-clamp-thingie on the 4-6-pole CPC rings faces toward the VNB?
Back to top
Joust



Joined: 05 May 2006
Posts: 2429
Location: Almonte, Ontario, Canada

TV/Projector: Marquee 8501LC

Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 5:00 am    Post subject:

its hard to follow your description.

The rear end is the one that has the metal "hose clamp" that firmly clamps the yoke to the neck of the tube by clamping the plastic tabs the sit flush on the neck. you cannot go by labels because no two are the same. stickers can be put anyplace.
Did you turn the magnetics inside the shell?
AFAIK all sony yokes are 180deg out of phase magnetically with the thompsons. Its easy to check. just bring a thompson close and see if it respells or attracts.
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
garyfritz



Joined: 08 Apr 2006
Posts: 12088
Location: Fort Collins, CO

Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 4:33 pm    Post subject:

Quote:
its hard to follow your description.

What, did I get too technical for you?? Laughing

My wife's got my camera so I can't take a picture. Here's a pic of a KF2211 I snitched from earlier in the thread. Do I have the front and back ends correct now? (I think I had it backwards before.)

Yes, I turned the magnetics in the shell. With the magnetics turned, the "label" end of the KF2211 (the non-hose-clamp end) repels the front end of the Thompson. So whatever repels the front of a Thompson should presumably be the front end of the KF2211, yes? And we want the hose-clamp to be on the aft end, so the front of the KF2211 can snug up as closely as possible to the coil in front of it?

Does fore & aft matter with the CPC rings? The I'm-guessing-4/6-pole rings have plastic tabs and a hose clamp too. The original 4-pole rings were mounted with their tabs & clamp facing the rear (neck/VNB) so I'm assuming the 4/6-pole rings do the same.

Thanks!



KF2211.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  26.15 KB
 Viewed:  8418 Time(s)

KF2211.jpg


Back to top
garyfritz



Joined: 08 Apr 2006
Posts: 12088
Location: Fort Collins, CO

Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 11:49 pm    Post subject:

Anyone? Anyone?? Do I have it right now?

Also, something occurred to me -- one of the reported major benefits of the Fyokes is the ability to run at much higher contrast levels without blooming. But you still have the basic limit of the blue's ability to emit light before overloading. If you run at higher contrasts, won't you have to run the blue even more defocused in order to compensate for the hotter red and green?
Back to top
cmjohnson



Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 5180
Location: Buried under G90s

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 1:10 am    Post subject:

No.


Your available brightness (contrast, really) doesn't change. Only your focus quality, particularly over a wider range of contrast levels.


I can run my PJ pretty darned hard and not notice any yellowing due to the blue tube running out of steam. I DON'T run it that hard, but
I CAN run it with the contrast up in the 90s without any blue output issues.


CJ
Back to top
tse



Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 1014
Location: Sweatbucket, Fl.

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 1:19 am    Post subject:

The illustration in your previous post is correct. I think the idea being have the magnet as close to the phosphor as possible. Best position would be with static focus at 50, both picture menu and service menu, slide magnet back and forth on neck for best focus. You can leave the CPC magnets off until this is determined. If mag ends up against the yoke or 1/2" back then you are good to go. If it ends up back more than 1/2" then position it 1/2" back from yoke and see if static focus control will bring it in. If the mag has to be back more than 1/2" the CPC mags might be too far back on the tube to work. At any rate, the CPC mags should be up aginst the back of the focus mag. The magnet is the wrong gauss if it has to be too far back, same if it is all the way against the yoke and the static focus won't bring things into focus.

Scott

_________________
"Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we would soon want bread."

Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
garyfritz



Joined: 08 Apr 2006
Posts: 12088
Location: Fort Collins, CO

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 1:23 am    Post subject:

OK, thanks Chris. The max light output (contrast) is no different than it was before -- but now you can use it better because your focus stays good at those higher levels. But if you calibrated your projector to a max contrast level of e.g. 60, that includes defocusing the blue so it gives a good flat color temp across the IRE range. Obviously the blue is saturating at that contrast=60 level, otherwise you wouldn't have to defocus to keep the temps flat. So if we say for argument's sake that the blue starts to saturate at IRE100 & contrast=50, then you could run at contrast=50 with no blue defocus. But it's going to saturate at lower IREs at contrast=60, so you have to defocus -- but it saturates at even lower IREs at contrast=70 or 80. So wouldn't you have to defocus the blue even more to handle the saturation at lower IREs?

Thanks for the tips, Scott! So the CPC mags are supposed to be right up against the focus coil -- or at least as close as you can get them, since you do have the hose-clamp thing in the way.
Back to top
Nashou66



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 16171
Location: West Seneca NY

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 1:34 am    Post subject:

This is where idividual contrast settings for each tube woulf be great to nail down greyscale and to compensate for tube iregularities between each tube.
TSE can this be on VDC's next softwear issue?

Athanasios

_________________
Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher


"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan

One Smart Dog!!!

Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
Gino



Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 1363
Location: Trinity Beach, AUSTRALIA

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 2:58 am    Post subject:

Nashou66 wrote:
This is where idividual contrast settings for each tube woulf be great to nail down greyscale and to compensate for tube iregularities between each tube.
TSE can this be on VDC's next softwear issue?

Athanasios

There is no need, this is what G2 and drive settings are for. The issue with the blue tube is not to do with 'software settings' per se

_________________
( B ) ( G ) ( R ) Blendzilla Down Under ( R ) ( G ) ( B ) - Tubes of Fury
Back to top
zGman



Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 599


Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 4:31 pm    Post subject: LUG's plus 1292 yokes!

Greetings,

Many thanks to Terry for helping out over the T'giving weekend.
The 9500 Ultra with LUG's and 1292 yokes and HFQ900's is finally up
and running and looks great. Thought I would share a few observations:

Only needed a couple clicks of Blue defocus to get a good greyscale.
The center focus adjustments ended up in the 20-30 range individually.
I did a mod to allow the focus yokes to move a little further forward,
(removed conv coil clamp & machined focus coil housing to fit over tabs)-
this was a small gain, but did allow the cpc magnets to go back to
their 'stock' position. I also hooked up the thermistors and mounted
in the focus coil housings. Also ran the focus coil ground wires to ground.

Also found that the stainless steel clamp rings on the focus coils were
accumulating significant static charge, and considered the possibility
that a few thousand volts built up around the tube neck might adversely
affect focus, so decided to use the marquee conv coil (plastic) clamps instead.
Also grounded the clamps on the cpc magnets.

Also addded the 10MOhm resistor and spark gap @ pin 7 for the LUG's,
and drilled additional holes in the back side of the neckboard covers
for better cooling (suggested by MP).

Overall, this is looking really great and thanks again to Terry (tubes, c-elements,
and lots of help and encouragement), MP (lenses and suggestions), Graham (yokes),
and Stuart (additional ultra chassis)......!

Cheers,
Galen
Back to top
garyfritz



Joined: 08 Apr 2006
Posts: 12088
Location: Fort Collins, CO

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 4:47 pm    Post subject:

Interesting, Galen! Hm, the KF2211's have the metal hose-clamp on the aft end, but they also have a plastic clamp thingie on the front end -- the 4 axial things sticking out of the top in the picture above are the handles for tightening it. Maybe I should just remove the metal clamp? The plastic clamp holds things just fine. Could probably even remove the plastic tabs that the metal clamp sits on, if moving the CPC mags up is a good idea...? The CPC mags also have a metal clamp, so if that's a concern, I could steal the plastic clamp from the Thompson coil. Seems odd that Ehome/VDC wouldn't have thought of that if the static is a problem, though...
Back to top
zGman



Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 599


Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 5:54 pm    Post subject:

Hi Gary,
I found it interesting that Barco always grounds the clamps for the defl/conv yokes
and the focus yokes.
I figured while I was in there it would be easy to ground the cpc clamp also.
The front twisty ring on your yokes is for centering, if you remove the rear tabs, you may
need to consider a method to center the rear also, but I think it's a good idea to have
the cpc's further forward, at least to where they were originally with the stock yokes.
Cheers,
G
Back to top
garyfritz



Joined: 08 Apr 2006
Posts: 12088
Location: Fort Collins, CO

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 7:15 pm    Post subject:

?? Are you sure about the front twisty rings? They don't appear to make any centering changes, and the coil shell itself fits snugly on the tube neck. It seems to act as a clamp -- though not a very good one.
Back to top
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> CRT Projectors All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 17, 18, 19 ... 35, 36, 37  Next
Page 18 of 37
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum