|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
yonexsp
Joined: 25 Apr 2006 Posts: 311
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2010 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Curt Palme wrote: | | MikeEby wrote: |
Well put! I just spend $550 ($300 for block $250 for shipping) for a bare block with the right casting number and date code for my 1965 Corvette....Most people would think I was crazy for that.
Mike |
Are you crazy? $550 for a rusting piece of 44 year old metal?
(see, it's all in your perception of what you're buying).
BTW Yon, haven't you threatened to go digital for about the last 3 years, but you're still here? Hmmmm.  |
No, but I could be wrong lol!!!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Spanky Ham
Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 5643 Location: Comedy Central
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 4:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Nashou66 wrote: | | Quote: | | You might also mention that your pjs are used. |
They were bran new never used. new old stock is more precise term.
How much would someone pay for a new never used $ 30k car that was 5 years old?
Athanasios |
It depends on the car, but it wouldn't fetch anywhere near the new price. The fact that there hasn't been much improvement in the last five years would have probably boosted the price for those that still love the CRT hobby, if they had known it hadn't been used.
| VideoGrabber wrote: | Spanky commented:
> As for the cards, I understand where Ken is coming from. With digitals being pretty good these days, one has to decide whether they want to spend money on add on or just go digital. <
Oh, certainly. I understand and agree as well. If that was the point he'd made, I'd just have said, yep. There will be a point where putting more $$$ into your CRT makes no economic sense. But that point will differ for each of us. And for a few, economics simply won't be a significant factor. |
Yeah, I agree with this. For me the break point is around $1.5k. As new and used digitals get better below that point, it keeps pushing the CRT down.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elaine Benes
Joined: 25 Apr 2006 Posts: 1416
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
There's a couple of HDMI transcoders on Amazon for under $80. Two different producers...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There's no question that the ~$1500 digitals keep getting better, or that that's accelerating the depreciation of our CRTs. I've said many times before, the size and weight, noise, and install/setup are huge drawbacks for many. Personally, I'd love to get rid of the noise. I'm an audio guy, too and in that regard, CRT is inferior.
Now, the reason I haven't switched, nor will I for at least a couple of years, is that for $1500, there is still no digital that will give me the picture I get from my current machine. Not even close. Yeah, I can get some better ANSI contrast, a little more brightness, and a quiet little box, but in exchange, I'll get visible pixels from my seating position, possibly banding, an elevated black level, and probably dithering, too. I have zero interest in single-chip DLP or LCD at the <$2000 price point. I think they still suck. Sorry, I do.
So, for me at least, I think it makes sense to sell my HD Fury and buy an HD Fury 3. If I get two more years out of it before I switch to digital, then sell it for $100, that's something like $100 total to get the absolute best PQ I can get out of my machine. I have no problem with that at all. Even if I was starting from scratch, I wouldn't have a problem with the price.
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
greg_mitch
Joined: 03 May 2006 Posts: 5320
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ecrabb wrote: | There's no question that the ~$1500 digitals keep getting better, or that that's accelerating the depreciation of our CRTs. I've said many times before, the size and weight, noise, and install/setup are huge drawbacks for many. Personally, I'd love to get rid of the noise. I'm an audio guy, too and in that regard, CRT is inferior.
Now, the reason I haven't switched, nor will I for at least a couple of years, is that for $1500, there is still no digital that will give me the picture I get from my current machine. Not even close. Yeah, I can get some better ANSI contrast, a little more brightness, and a quiet little box, but in exchange, I'll get visible pixels from my seating position, possibly banding, an elevated black level, and probably dithering, too. I have zero interest in single-chip DLP or LCD at the <$2000 price point. I think they still suck. Sorry, I do.
So, for me at least, I think it makes sense to sell my HD Fury and buy an HD Fury 3. If I get two more years out of it before I switch to digital, then sell it for $100, that's something like $100 total to get the absolute best PQ I can get out of my machine. I have no problem with that at all. Even if I was starting from scratch, I wouldn't have a problem with the price.
SC |
I really don't see how you can think <$2,000 digitals "suck". Do they have drawbacks....sure...do they really "suck", no way. I really think if you saw a Panny AE4000 in action you would withdraw that statement.
I think the only drawback from CRT standpoint is black level. I really believe that if I had a Panny AE4000 setup in my room and could A/B them, the Panny would provide the same or better "overall" experience.
If the pixel thing annoys you just defocus the projector a bit...I imagine that would help you.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Greg, that was a bit of hyperbole. But, honestly, after watching Avatar and seeing the fades to black in the trailers, I was still pretty disappointed. Not in the black level itself, but the dynamic range. I saw posterization in the low-IRE fades to black. You can find my comments on it in one of the 3D threads. I HATE digital artifacts. Pixels, banding, posterization, noise. I HATE it when artifacts remind me I'm watching digital.
To sort of get back to the topic, my point was that there are still no <$2000 digitals (the AE4000 included) that make me want divest from my CRT. That may change in a year or two, but in the immediate, I would have no problem spending $200 or $300 on repairs or improvements for my CRT, because A) most of the equipment can be resold to recoup some of the investment, and B) anything else I'd be willing to replace the CRT with would be at least 8-10 times the price. Basically, short of something in the class of Art's setup, or possibly a JVC RS2/RS20, I haven't yet seen a digital that I felt compelled to spend the money on to replace what I have - what I'm already thrilled with.
Regardless, I still don't understand the "These add-ons are so expensive, I'm gonna have to switch to digital" thought. Am I the only one baffled by the what sentiment essentially amounts to: "These $300 add-ons are ridiculous, so I'm going to have to get rid of my CRT projector and buy a $2000 digital". Huh?
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark_A_W
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 3068 Location: Sunny Melbourne Australia
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| VideoGrabber wrote: | MAW commented:
> But I have kittens when I see the price of the latest HDMI transcoders. They literally cost more than either of my XGs did. <
Really? I wasn't aware that any of them cost over $30,000. Wow! That is pretty expensive.
Oh, wait, did you mean your XG cost used? In that case, come back in 10 years or so and check out the prices on 10-year old used HDMI transcoders. I predict they'll be quite cheap (or even free, if you can find one). |
The original purchase price is COMPLETELY irrelevant.
The value of the projector these days is all that matters. A few hundred dollars.
And hundreds of dollars on a unnecessary widget to connect to is ludicrous - you can just plug a PC straight into the projector, that's what they were designed for after all.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How much did the PC cost, Mark?
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark_A_W
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 3068 Location: Sunny Melbourne Australia
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lots, it's a monster.
But it does many things - I'm typing this on the PC that runs my HT. Plays games, does CAD, browses web, etc.
No one part cost as much as a new HDMI transcoder, and it came with a DVI to VGA dongle for free.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Curt Palme CRT Tech
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 24396 Location: Langley, BC
TV/Projector: All of them!
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 10:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So by your logic Mark, a water pump for a 1980 car should be about $1.00, because the car isn't worth more than $300?
My repair rate for a Sony 12XX should be $2.00 per hour because the set isn't worth anything?
Give your head a shake!
No one is forcing you to buy anything. If you don't like the price, simply do without.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark_A_W
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 3068 Location: Sunny Melbourne Australia
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I did go without.
I sold my ISS card.
Refer to my other comments about you spending 6 hours repairing a $20 switcher card. And a 12xx isn't worth fixing anymore, unless it's a 1292. Hell, I have an 808 in the shed that's not worth a thing (need a green tube).
And yes, for a 1980 car you go to pick-a-part and pull out another water pump for next to nothing.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Curt Palme CRT Tech
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 24396 Location: Langley, BC
TV/Projector: All of them!
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, you can (water pump). And if you're a poor college kid, maybe you'll do just that. But.. if the car has low miles, runs well, and heck, maybe it has sentimental value, then you'll understand the value of spending $100 (or $50 or whatever) for a new or rebuilt water pump.
Take your logic and go to a car dealership, and try and argue that the new water pump should only be $5.00.
Repairs to an old home are as much or more than to a new one. Tubes for a 'worthless' old tube stereo amp are as much or more than they were 20 years ago.
I just don't get your logic...it makes no sense.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark_A_W
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 3068 Location: Sunny Melbourne Australia
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Curt, that's because your livelihood depends on my logic making no sense. You will have to change your primary focus from CRT to digital, or audio, or something, over the next few years.
A home doesn't depreciate, it increases in value, it is worth fixing.
I wouldn't buy a new pump for a 1980 car (unless it was a very special car...but to me, no car is special, I hate the frickin things, I ride a bike whenever I can).
And I have a tube amp. A single ended triode class A amp. I don't use it, as my solid state gear is better in almost every way.
Basically, the HDMI stuff is overpriced. How many XG HDMI cards did Moome end up selling? Bugger all IIRC. Everything sells at the right price, therefore the price was too high. (And yes, there comes a point when it's no longer worth the bother.)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mp20748
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 5689 Location: Maryland
TV/Projector: 9500LC Ultra / Super 02 and 03 VIM
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Curt Palme wrote: |
Tubes for a 'worthless' old tube stereo amp are as much or more than they were 20 years ago
|
I have a 17 watt per channel tube amplifier, that I've had for about 35 years. I think it came out of an old JukeBox at that time. So it's got to be older than 35 years, because it was old when I got it. I had since rebuilt it and it's now in my living room connected to two NEAR tower speakers.
A few years ago I noticed a distortion in one of the channels, so I put it on the bench and found out that one of the output transformers had an open connection to the plate of the output tube. When i found that out I was depressed for a awhile until I decided to open that transformer and was able to fix that connection.
If somehow I was not able to fix that connection and would have needed to replace that transformer, that would have been the next thing on my agenda. And to be honest, the cost to either replace with matching transformers or have the defected one re-wired would not have been an issues for me either way.
Everything in my possession does not necessarily have a dollar amount attached to it, in that it depends on what it would cost to keep it functioning. Some things to me is worth that extra $$
A few years after i married my wife, she bought a pair of Finch birds at the pet store. one of them got sick and she called a VET and was told it would cost $30.00 to have the bird looked at by the VET. My wife told me about the situation and that we needed to spend $30.00 to take the bird to the VET. I told her that we only paid $28.00 for the pair, so why would we spend $30.00 in hopes to save one of them, when we should just buy another. Me, being the knucklehead I was at the time, did not inderstand that my wife had become attached to that bird. And therefore, there was something going on that cost was not the issue.
I've learned from that situation. It taught me well... later on when things got rough in the marriage we separated. And in doing so, we both were mostly concerned with what it's all going to cost. So forgetting all that was invested in the marriage and that my wife was no longer that super fine chick I met 30 years ago, it only made sense to spare all cost and get something newer (younger). but that situation with the bird reminded me that there's more to something than what you can simple put a dollar value to.
Right now If i could put a value on my wife, and some other things that are special to me, it world be PRICELESS.
I think it's ridiculus for someone to place a value on something - 1, they don't care much for and don't own or need. 2, has no consideration for what's all involved in making that product and it's importance to someone else.
For instance. I don't own or have any intentions of owning a Sony 1292. With that, should I be so quick to say what it's worth to someone that owns one?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
greg_mitch
Joined: 03 May 2006 Posts: 5320
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 1:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Did you just compare getting attached to a pet to the home theater hobby?
Step outside the lab a bit more Mike!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 2:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Greg, I could be mistaken, but rather than the direct comparison you implied, I think the takeaway from Mike's post was that just because YOU think something is of little value, doesn't mean it isn't worth more to others - in one way or another.
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
greg_mitch
Joined: 03 May 2006 Posts: 5320
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 3:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I know what he meant, I'm not that stupid. But the analogy was about a living thing...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Curt Palme CRT Tech
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 24396 Location: Langley, BC
TV/Projector: All of them!
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 4:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Mark_A_W wrote: | Curt, that's because your livelihood depends on my logic making no sense. You will have to change your primary focus from CRT to digital, or audio, or something, over the next few years.
Basically, the HDMI stuff is overpriced. How many XG HDMI cards did Moome end up selling? Bugger all IIRC. Everything sells at the right price, therefore the price was too high. (And yes, there comes a point when it's no longer worth the bother.) |
No, I realize that CRT will be more or less dead in 5-10 years, but I'll bet those left here will all have Cine 9s or 9500Ultras. I'm well set up already, preparing for a post CRT world. I'd be further along.. but I've sold $35K in projectors in the last 2 weeks (I'm not exaggerating), so more work on a new site is on the backburner.
I will just agree to disagree with you regarding pricing.. When I saw the first generation Fury and what went into the manufacturing of it, I thought it would have cost far more than it did. IN fact, I'd go as far as saying that I would not consider it worth my while to manufacture ANY of the third party items sold on this site. It's easy to sit behind a computer and bitch about the pricing of someone, be it the price of electronics, or the price that Sparky charges to adopt out a rescued dog.
I really don't think that Moome would hvae sold many more cards had his HDMI cards come out at say $149. I did that little experiment and dropped some CRT prices by 30% or so before Christmas. Non one bit. I kept my pricing consistent on the site, and as I just said, sold $35K worth of sets in the last 2 weeks. I'm now backed up 2 weeks, that's how long it will take to get the 15 or so sets out the door that I sold.
BTW, I just ordered a Sony card from Moome, and he sold one for the XG to one of my customers last week. I also ordered 3 Furys this weekend, with 2 more to be ordered as soon as the deposits come in for the set sales.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Curt Palme CRT Tech
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 24396 Location: Langley, BC
TV/Projector: All of them!
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 4:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| greg_mitch wrote: | Did you just compare getting attached to a pet to the home theater hobby?
Step outside the lab a bit more Mike!  |
Actually, you'd be surprised how much my CRT business and Sparky's dog rescue has in common, despite the commodities being completely different. The business model is the same in many many ways.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AnalogRocks Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 26706 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
TV/Projector: Sony 1252Q, AMPRO 4000G
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 4:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
If it's old it's usually better, and restoration and saving it, is much more fun than buying a new anything.
I had a friend that was into the Ford plan. He would lease a new car or truck every 2 years like clock work and never stopped paying. That to me is ridiculous. I took my ( then ) 10 year old car and rebuilt it, with upgraded parts, spent $2100 and didn't have to touch it for over a year. No payments, no issues.
$30 buck for a water pump? So what? I've spent thousands on my cars and the newest is 1994.
The current project is 1988 and my daily driver is a 1985. I don't give a rats ass about what other people think my car's worth. I had a guy today balk at the figure I gave him on the current project car. He's a tight wad. He believes old cars are worthless and should cost next to nothing.
I disagree.
When I bought my 1988 I asked around at what the price should be. People thought I was crazy to pay what I did. F'kem!
Something is worth what people want to pay for it. I saw it, I wanted it, I bought it.
Some of the people that buy the Moome EXT's and HDFury's have $3500-7000 into their TV's. Why not add a $200-300 device to make it work with the latest and greatest? Most people just want it to go.
Plus there's the WA Factor. I've seen it countless times.
Someone will email me saying " My wife will divorce me if I have to scrap this $6000 TV that I told her would last for 10-15 years just so I can play my HDMI only cable box on it" So you look at it this way: $300 for an HDMI to YPbPr converter or loose half of what you own in the divorce.
_________________ Tech support for nothing
CRT.
HD done right!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|