Return to the CurtPalme.com main site CurtPalme.com Home Theater Forum
A forum with a sense of fun and community for Home Theater enthusiasts!
Products for Sale ] [ FAQ: Hooking it all up ] [ CRT Primer/FAQ ] [ Best/Worst CRT Projectors List ] [ Setup Tips & Manuals ] [ Advanced Procedures ] [ Newsletter ]
 
Blu-ray disc release list and must-have titles. Buy the latest and best Blu-ray titles to show off in your home theater!

 As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! 

'Capitalism: A Love Story' on Blu-ray: March 9, 2010

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> Movie & Media Talk
Author Message
kal
Forum Administrator


Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Posts: 18114
Location: Ottawa, Canada

TV/Projector: JVC DLA-NZ7

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 5:56 pm    Post subject: 'Capitalism: A Love Story' on Blu-ray: March 9, 2010

Help support our forum! Purchase from Amazon.com using our links and a small percentage of your payment automatically goes towards supporting this site at no cost to you!
-------------------



Capitalism: A Love Story [Blu-ray] (2009)


Michael Moore's controversal (did he ever make anything that wasn't?) movie hits Blu-ray in March 2010 after originally being announced for December 2009. Anyone seen it? Comments?


"Michael Moore's didactic documentary style is actually a source of inspiration in Capitalism: A Love Story. This film, which explores the history of incongruence between American capitalism and democracy, is evidently a culmination of Moore's lifetime of research into this topic: he begins the movie by admitting his longstanding interest, rooted in childhood experiences in Flint, Michigan. As a result, the film displays an expertise that is less irritating than in Moore's earlier works, in which various loopholes can be found in one-sided presentations (see Bowling for Columbine).

Here Moore employs his trademark tactics to make a satirical documentary that functions as a film-based, grassroots political strategy meant to provoke revolt. Consisting of patched-together clips from various eras and media outlets, the film weaves a narrative that underscores Moore's argument that while America is a success because of its democracy, it has been denigrated by capitalism, which he calls "a system of taking and giving, mostly taking." Capitalism: A Love Story is a patriotic call to arms that seeks to ignite rage in the viewer who is tired of political stupidity resulting in poverty and hardship among a dwindling middle class. It begins by tracing the growing gap between the rich and poor, from the Depression through the 1950s "free enterprise" boom. Using clips of FDR and Jimmy Carter warning against greed and inequality, Moore shows how gradually Americans came to accept Reaganomics, corporate corruption, then Bush-era swindling over time. This history serves as context for his explanation of the housing crisis, the collapse of banks, and Bush's covert, last-ditch efforts to pass sketchy bills on the cusp of Obama's election.

Moore asks several lawyers, senators, and bankers, "What the **** happened?" and each offers intelligent assessments of situations that many American viewers still struggle to comprehend. Unfortunately, there are corny Moore moments throughout the film, such as when he takes an armored truck to various banking headquarters and harasses security guards to let him in to reclaim money stolen from the American public. Clips of Bush dancing juxtaposed with shots of people crying because they've lost their homes are melodramatic and only weaken Moore's arguments. Like Robin Hood, Moore seeks justice, but his greatest strength is as a translator between those speaking a complex political language and his viewers. Capitalism: A Love Story, while it does have a condescending tone throughout, does much to relay a complicated history that we all need to know for the sake of our own empowerment."
--Trinie Dalton

Release date: March 9, 2010 (pushed back from Dec 2009)

Link to order: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B002QW7AK8/curtpalmecrtp-20

Pre-order at Amazon using the link above to get the best price. If the price goes down (even just for a day) between now and the release date you get the lowest price.

-----------
Help support our forum! Purchase from Amazon.com using our links and a small percentage of your payment automatically goes towards supporting this site at no cost to you!

Kal

_________________

Support our site by using our affiliate links. We thank you!
My basement/HT/bar/brewery build 2.0
Back to top
View user's photo album (18 photos)
MikeEby



Joined: 24 Jun 2007
Posts: 5237
Location: Osceola, Indiana

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 6:34 pm    Post subject:

All right...this one looks good!

SC, Ron....Here fishy fishy. Smile

Mike

_________________
Doing HD since the last century!
Back to top
ecrabb
Forum Moderator


Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Posts: 15909
Location: Utah

TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 6:44 pm    Post subject:

Good in what sense? Like "good" meaning "awful"?

Yeah, I know I can't wait, Mike. Rolling Eyes

Let's see, make a movie about how capitalism is horrible, even though you're a self-made millionaire specifically using the capitalist system you supposedly abhor. Whatever, Michael - ya hypocritical douche bag.

This is definitely a renter. Sorry Kal.

SC
Back to top
View user's photo album (10 photos)
MikeEby



Joined: 24 Jun 2007
Posts: 5237
Location: Osceola, Indiana

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 6:54 pm    Post subject:

Hey even a lefty-commie like me takes Moore documentarys with a "grain of salt". Entertainment...nothing more.

I have Food, Inc. on BD, not a Michael Moore documentary but the same kind of thing...Haven't had a chance to watch it yet, figured it might be a time to start new diet prior to watching it.

Mike

_________________
Doing HD since the last century!


Last edited by MikeEby on Thu Dec 17, 2009 7:56 pm; edited 3 times in total
Back to top
emdawgz1



Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 7949


Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 6:55 pm    Post subject:

ecrabb wrote:
Good in what sense? Like "good" meaning "awful"?

Yeah, I know I can't wait, Mike. Rolling Eyes

Let's see, make a movie about how capitalism is horrible, even though you're a self-made millionaire specifically using the capitalist system you supposedly abhor. Whatever, Michael - ya hypocritical douche bag.

This is definitely a renter. Sorry Kal.

SC


If you saw the movie, i doubt you would think he's anti capitalism. Capitalism is NOT horrible. Our system has been taken over by Globalists... if anything he's anti Globalist... as am i... i think. Wink

_________________
Follow my blog
www.thesinglebrother.com
Back to top
View user's photo album (3 photos)
emdawgz1



Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 7949


Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 6:56 pm    Post subject:

MikeEby wrote:
Hey even a lefty-commie like me take Moore docs with a "grain of salt". Entertainment...nothing more.

I got "Food.Inc" on BD, not a Michael Moore documentary but the same kind of thing...Haven't had a chance to watch it yet, figured it might be a time to start new diet prior to watching it.

Mike


Food inc is a great film and a TREMENDOUS wake up call for us to think about the fruits of the ... Food inc.

_________________
Follow my blog
www.thesinglebrother.com
Back to top
View user's photo album (3 photos)
ecrabb
Forum Moderator


Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Posts: 15909
Location: Utah

TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 8:31 pm    Post subject:

Food, Inc. was pretty good. I don't think the thesis painted an entirely objective picture, but there was much about the film to appreciate.

I do think they spent way too much time on the Monsanto seed patent issue... While patent law (especially is it pertains to our food supply) is certainly an important subject, the lengthy segment on genetic research/technology seemed a little out of place - at least in the depth they presented it. The tinfoil-hat segment on Monsanto "henchmen" surveilling farmers (without any proof of such) was also out of place in an otherwise good presentation. Oh, and it also seemed like the filmmakers went out of their way to avoid even mentioning personal responsibility in our daily decision-making with respect to our food consumption.

The main thrust of the film - buy local, buy fresh, eat healthy - I was totally cool with, though.

SC
Back to top
View user's photo album (10 photos)
emdawgz1



Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 7949


Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 8:38 pm    Post subject:

ecrabb wrote:
Food, Inc. was pretty good. I don't think the thesis painted an entirely objective picture, but there was much about the film to appreciate.

I do think they spent way too much time on the Monsanto seed patent issue... While patent law (especially is it pertains to our food supply) is certainly an important subject, the lengthy segment on genetic research/technology seemed a little out of place - at least in the depth they presented it. The tinfoil-hat segment on Monsanto "henchmen" surveilling farmers (without any proof of such) was also out of place in an otherwise good presentation. Oh, and it also seemed like the filmmakers went out of their way to avoid even mentioning personal responsibility in our daily decision-making with respect to our food consumption.

The main thrust of the film - buy local, buy fresh, eat healthy - I was totally cool with, though.

SC



I'm curious as to what you mean by this ...

_________________
Follow my blog
www.thesinglebrother.com
Back to top
View user's photo album (3 photos)
Nashou66



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 16171
Location: West Seneca NY

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 8:56 pm    Post subject:

emdawgz1 wrote:
ecrabb wrote:
Food, Inc. was pretty good. I don't think the thesis painted an entirely objective picture, but there was much about the film to appreciate.

I do think they spent way too much time on the Monsanto seed patent issue... While patent law (especially is it pertains to our food supply) is certainly an important subject, the lengthy segment on genetic research/technology seemed a little out of place - at least in the depth they presented it. The tinfoil-hat segment on Monsanto "henchmen" surveilling farmers (without any proof of such) was also out of place in an otherwise good presentation. Oh, and it also seemed like the filmmakers went out of their way to avoid even mentioning personal responsibility in our daily decision-making with respect to our food consumption.

The main thrust of the film - buy local, buy fresh, eat healthy - I was totally cool with, though.

SC



I'm curious as to what you mean by this ...


I don't think an explanation is needed. Common sense is all.

Athanasios

_________________
Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher


"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan

One Smart Dog!!!

Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
Back to top
View user's photo album (1 photos)
emdawgz1



Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 7949


Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 9:18 pm    Post subject:

Nashou66 wrote:
emdawgz1 wrote:
ecrabb wrote:
Food, Inc. was pretty good. I don't think the thesis painted an entirely objective picture, but there was much about the film to appreciate.

I do think they spent way too much time on the Monsanto seed patent issue... While patent law (especially is it pertains to our food supply) is certainly an important subject, the lengthy segment on genetic research/technology seemed a little out of place - at least in the depth they presented it. The tinfoil-hat segment on Monsanto "henchmen" surveilling farmers (without any proof of such) was also out of place in an otherwise good presentation. Oh, and it also seemed like the filmmakers went out of their way to avoid even mentioning personal responsibility in our daily decision-making with respect to our food consumption.

The main thrust of the film - buy local, buy fresh, eat healthy - I was totally cool with, though.

SC



I'm curious as to what you mean by this ...


I don't think an explanation is needed. Common sense is all.

Athanasios


Then maybe i'm Lacking in C.S. When i saw the film i saw the whole thrust of the film was to motivate people to think about their food choices, and to ask for greater accountability from those agencies charged with keeping the food chain safe. To question what kind of things are being done in the name of providing "affordable food".

_________________
Follow my blog
www.thesinglebrother.com
Back to top
View user's photo album (3 photos)
kal
Forum Administrator


Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Posts: 18114
Location: Ottawa, Canada

TV/Projector: JVC DLA-NZ7

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 9:42 pm    Post subject:

ecrabb wrote:
This is definitely a renter. Sorry Kal.

No need to be sorry - I didn't write it! Smile

I enjoyed his first movie (Roger and Me) but even that was slightly contrived at times. From then on I've found that they've gotten farther and farther away from actual "documentaries". They're still interesting to watch sometimes (I certainly want to see this one) but you have to not take anything at face value and understand his motivation.

Kal

_________________

Support our site by using our affiliate links. We thank you!
My basement/HT/bar/brewery build 2.0
Back to top
View user's photo album (18 photos)
kal
Forum Administrator


Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Posts: 18114
Location: Ottawa, Canada

TV/Projector: JVC DLA-NZ7

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 9:54 pm    Post subject:

MikeEby wrote:
I have Food, Inc. on BD, not a Michael Moore documentary but the same kind of thing...Haven't had a chance to watch it yet, figured it might be a time to start new diet prior to watching it.

I liked that one Mike. I watched it a few weeks ago.

From what I can tell it seems a lot more truthful. Less contrived. Yes, there are moments where the people being interviewed probably don't know exactly what sort of movie they're being interviewed for exactly but in the limited information we get I'd say it's certainly a lot more educational than the stuff that Moore puts out. Give it a spin and let me know what you think.

I have to say one thing: There's one farmer that they interview time and time again who is extremely well spoken and really seems to "get it". For example, grazing animals should eat normal food out in the fields like they've done for millions of years, not some weird mash of their brothers and sisters. He's great to listen to and I think I agreed with absolutely everything he said. Very smart guy too. He seems more of a chemist/scientist than a farmer.

My wife an I have been buying a good portion of our food (50% or so including all meat) from food co-op around here that doesn't use any kinds of hormones in their meats or feed weird stuff to their animals. The food just tastes better not to mention probably a lot heathier. For example, the chickens are fully grown with actual bones instead of mostly cartilage. Next time you buy a pre-cooked rotisserie chicken from the grocery store note that there's no wishbone. That's because they're force fed all sorts of odd stuff to make them grow much faster than they would normally and never really grow up normally. Most end up breaking a leg or two because they can't keep up with their growth. That just doesn't seem normal to me. It's all done for profit of course.

Kal

_________________

Support our site by using our affiliate links. We thank you!
My basement/HT/bar/brewery build 2.0
Back to top
View user's photo album (18 photos)
kal
Forum Administrator


Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Posts: 18114
Location: Ottawa, Canada

TV/Projector: JVC DLA-NZ7

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 9:57 pm    Post subject:

ecrabb wrote:
I do think they spent way too much time on the Monsanto seed patent issue... While patent law (especially is it pertains to our food supply) is certainly an important subject, the lengthy segment on genetic research/technology seemed a little out of place - at least in the depth they presented it. The tinfoil-hat segment on Monsanto "henchmen" surveilling farmers (without any proof of such) was also out of place in an otherwise good presentation.

Yeah, that part bugged me too. If I had a company that had spent that much money on patents and other licensing I think I would have wanted to protect my IP too.

It's always easy to vilify large corporations so it's an easy target in these sorts of movies.

It's certainly one of the better documentaries I've seen in the last couple of years.

Kal

_________________

Support our site by using our affiliate links. We thank you!
My basement/HT/bar/brewery build 2.0
Back to top
View user's photo album (18 photos)
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    CurtPalme.com Forum Index -> Movie & Media Talk All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum