| Author |
Message |
Mark_A_W
Joined: 15 Mar 2006 Posts: 3068 Location: Sunny Melbourne Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 10:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Umm...which 1080i or 1080p? You guys never say.
What about 1080i 120hz versus 1080p 60hz? Eh? Eh?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nashou66
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 16171 Location: West Seneca NY
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mark_A_W wrote: | | Umm...which 1080i or 1080p? You guys never say. |
Mark, 95% of the time, we don't need to specify which 1080i or 1080p because 1080i/60 and 1080p/60 are the two standards. Standard sources and consumer displays output to- and sync to both those standard refresh rates. It's only when you introduce esoteric scalers and HTPC's, that you need to specify.
Let's put it this way, if nobody specifies a refresh rate, it's usually pretty safe to assume they mean the "standard" 1080i or 1080p.
| Mark_A_W wrote: | | What about 1080i 120hz versus 1080p 60hz? Eh? Eh? |
I would imagine those would be about the same... In theory.
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dturco
Joined: 06 Feb 2009 Posts: 3778 Location: Eastern Shore Maryland
TV/Projector: Runco DLP VX-3000i Marquee 9500 parts doner
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 11:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
O.K. I'll look for that when I redo the 1080i settings. I would like to use my Integra DVD player for upscaling as it has a better scaler built in than the Sony Blu-ray. I had pretty much abandoned the thought of this as it was getting to be a nuisance.
Thanks again.
_________________ Firefly rules. Can't stop the signal.
http://www.hulu.com/firefly
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elaine Benes
Joined: 25 Apr 2006 Posts: 1416
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Line doubled images on graphics grade crt projectors are only using a tiny fraction of the available phosphor, whereas 2500x2000 computer applications are using every available molecule. It would be my assumption that you'd get much faster wear with super high resolution since you're actually using much more of the phosphor.
Also, institutional installations are most often setup for whatever the purpose is, rarely is that purpose to produce a pleasant "image" most often it is to display data, high contrast white or other solid backgrounds with little change or movement, lots of time its just text. If you want a formula for burning tubes quickly, simply set up the highest possible resolution to use the most phosphor, then excite ALL of that phosphor with a solid color background to best display text on, surely you'll burn tubes much faster than if you show video at constantly varying brightness with an infinitely varying background and only actually use a tiny fraction of the available phosphor because your resolution is so low...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|