|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Mr. Green
Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Posts: 1394 Location: Calgary
TV/Projector: Marquee 9501LC / NEC 9PG+
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stuffandpuff
Joined: 30 Jul 2008 Posts: 69
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
LED projectors are already five-seven times as bright as models that came out 18 months ago thanks to PhlatLight technology. I think we COULD see LED on par with current LCD in under two years. In fact LED should really outperform LCD and DLP in terms of Contrast and colors and of course lamp/LED life BUT business and technology make strange bed fellows and the better product does not always make it to market. If it did we would all be driving cars that get 500 miles per gallon of gas or better yet, vehicles that require no gas or electricity.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WanMan
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 10270
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not looking for something brighter--I'm not a dimwit. I have very good low-light eye performance. I need contract ratio, both in ANSI and On/Off. I have no need for 'trickery' in CR department (a la dynamic CR).
_________________ Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
garyfritz
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 12088 Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Yeah, I've never seen a dynamic CR (iris or otherwise) that I could tolerate. I think they all suck. Give me a display technology that doesn't need hacks like that. LED projectors should do that very nicely.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yep. Dynamic iris (brightness modulation) is a bailing-wire-and-duct-tape solution to the problem of constant-brightness light source and their elevated black levels. Of course, to be fair, it actually does work - sorta.
However, you could say the same of a modulated LED light source like PhlatLight. In the end, it's going to look similar to dynamic iris. It's still going to modulate brightness down on low APL scenes and up on high APL scenes. On the "starry night" scene, the stars are not going to be very bright, while the sunny snowy scene will be. It will be instantaneous, though (unlike the iris) and does eliminate the hot, expensive, inconsistent lamp - which is a good thing. But, there's still a bit of a "hack" feel to it.
Personally, I hope a technology like the LCD LED back lights (with local dimming) comes along for projection. If somebody can do that, you'd have the best of both worlds. Black blacks along with bright whites in low-APL scenes like space, night lights, headlights at night, concerts, etc.
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Person99
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 4899 Location: Flower Mound, TX
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| WanMan wrote: | | I'm not looking for something brighter--I'm not a dimwit. I have very good low-light eye performance. I need contract ratio, both in ANSI and On/Off. I have no need for 'trickery' in CR department (a la dynamic CR). |
Unless you are not human, that "trickery" when well executed will perform better than your current PJ.
_________________ Dave
A train station is where the train stops. A bus station is where the bus stops. On my desk, I have a work station....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Person99
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 4899 Location: Flower Mound, TX
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ecrabb wrote: | | Yep. Dynamic iris (brightness modulation) is a bailing-wire-and-duct-tape solution to the problem of constant-brightness light source and their elevated black levels. Of course, to be fair, it actually does work - sorta. |
I've seen them well executed and not so well executed (not sure which one's Gary has seen). For instance, the Mitsu ones are pretty bad. On the well executed ones, about the only really telling sign they are there is the fluctuating black/gray of letterbox bars on scope movies--and if you are watching scope movies correctly, you'll never see those bars--so a non-issue.
I agree that the LEDs should perform better than an DI due to speed, if they can get them to look better, it will be very cool.
Also, I don't agree with you on the star field thing. On a good DI projector even with a native CR of only about 4000:1, star fields look pretty good as your iris also closes down.
In fact, I have to say, I think about 4000:1 on/off looks pretty good accept in two situations:
1) VERY low APL scenes, and
2) Fade to black
A DI handles both of these reasonably well.
_________________ Dave
A train station is where the train stops. A bus station is where the bus stops. On my desk, I have a work station....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
garyfritz
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 12088 Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
In scenes like: star field with planet, camera pans, sun comes into view, planet suddenly gets much dimmer (much dimmer than it should have been due to your eye's irises shutting down) ... I don't see how a DI can do that without visible and annoying artifacts. That's an extreme case but it is not the only place where (in my experience) a DI looks like crap. Dave, how could that case be "well executed" ?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Person99
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 4899 Location: Flower Mound, TX
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| garyfritz wrote: | | In scenes like: star field with planet, camera pans, sun comes into view, planet suddenly gets much dimmer (much dimmer than it should have been due to your eye's irises shutting down) ... I don't see how a DI can do that without visible and annoying artifacts. That's an extreme case but it is not the only place where (in my experience) a DI looks like crap. Dave, how could that case be "well executed" ? |
What projector was it? I'm not sure exactly how many scenes there are like that (I'm thinking few, so I think you are spitting hairs--in other works, how is this any worse than the gray-white snow of Happy Feet or Ice Age on a CRT?).
"Well executed" in this type of scene come down to three things IMO:
1) Speed of DI
2) Panel's native CR
3) Sophistication of the scene/APL calculation
The scene you described I would find horrible on a Mitsu HC5000 (pretty much really bad like you described it). But, that scene on an Epson 1080UB would not be nearly as bad thanks to a native CR of about 4000:1 and a fast iris.
_________________ Dave
A train station is where the train stops. A bus station is where the bus stops. On my desk, I have a work station....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WanMan
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 10270
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 1:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Person99 wrote: | | WanMan wrote: | | I'm not looking for something brighter--I'm not a dimwit. I have very good low-light eye performance. I need contract ratio, both in ANSI and On/Off. I have no need for 'trickery' in CR department (a la dynamic CR). |
Unless you are not human, that "trickery" when well executed will perform better than your current PJ. |
You walk on false grounds. My comments are not based on my current projector. My point is that a device-level imager having a CR of 2-3K:1 and or a system which uses a floating dynamic window of CR limited to less than 2K:1 is seen in many pieces of films I appreciate, and digital projector designers do not.
I look forward to having per pixel control of in the 10K:1 area, and I think this will come in the form of SED/FED. LCD/oS, DLP, plasma, and even LED all seem to work on the wrong premise.
Oh sure, they are good for those that are not critical viewers, but then again those manufacturers are not gunning for my business.
_________________ Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WanMan
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 10270
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| garyfritz wrote: | | In scenes like: star field with planet, camera pans, sun comes into view, planet suddenly gets much dimmer (much dimmer than it should have been due to your eye's irises shutting down) ... I don't see how a DI can do that without visible and annoying artifacts. That's an extreme case but it is not the only place where (in my experience) a DI looks like crap. Dave, how could that case be "well executed" ? |
There are plenty of scenes in movies and television in which the bookends of contrast are in the frame and the DI must work on the laws of averages to make the brights dim and the darks gray.
_________________ Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Person99
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 4899 Location: Flower Mound, TX
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| WanMan wrote: | | Person99 wrote: | | WanMan wrote: | | I'm not looking for something brighter--I'm not a dimwit. I have very good low-light eye performance. I need contract ratio, both in ANSI and On/Off. I have no need for 'trickery' in CR department (a la dynamic CR). |
Unless you are not human, that "trickery" when well executed will perform better than your current PJ. |
You walk on false grounds. ..is seen in many pieces of films I appreciate, and digital projector designers do not. |
Funny you should say I walk on false grounds, then you make a statement that is such an obvious logical fallacy. You have no idea what films the digital projector designers like. For example, wm tunes JVC projector (and has replaced his G90 with one since it excedes the G90), you think he is less critical than you? Kane works with Samsung and the PJs he has had input on set the benchmark for color accuracy for ANY technology. Kuo certainly knows his way around a CRT as we all follow his set up guide. He is currently pulling out XGs to replace them with RS2, which he notes exceeds the XG in image quality. But none of these guys appreciate the films you do--yeah, right.
| WanMan wrote: | | I look forward to having per pixel control of in the 10K:1 area, and I think this will come in the form of SED/FED. LCD/oS, DLP, plasma, and even LED all seem to work on the wrong premise. |
CRT works on the wrong premise then also. There is no perfect projector, you pick your poison. I don't see you complaining about CRT horrible ANSI CR or other shortcomings, yet, you are completely ready to pounce on weaknesses of other technologies. Why not try getting a bit educated
| WanMan wrote: | Oh sure, they are good for those that are not critical viewers, but then again those manufacturers are not gunning for my business.  |
Again, this is a false assumption and a logical fallacy. Almost every critical viewer has left CRT recently for digital technology since it has finally overall exceeded CRT on balance. So, one could only assume you are actually a less critical viewer than most enthusiasts since you have not moved to something like an RS2 that outperforms your current PJ in pretty much every way.
_________________ Dave
A train station is where the train stops. A bus station is where the bus stops. On my desk, I have a work station....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cmjohnson
Joined: 03 Apr 2006 Posts: 5180 Location: Buried under G90s
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 2:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've now seen VDC's new single chip, 1080P, LED-illuminated DLP projector in person. I would not hesitate to say that it is a very good
projector that would be quite at home in almost anybody's home theater. it does not dazzle you with thousands of lumens of light output
but it is sufficiently bright, for certain. Its color gamut is huge and there are no visible rainbow effects due to the very high sequential
color switching rate that VDC has chosen to use. I'm sensitive to rainbow effects and could only get a hint of rainbows when looking
toward the PJ and scanning my eyes rapidly across it. I never saw a rainbow effect on the screen even when TRYING to reveal one,
which is generally easy for me to do on regular single chip or LCD machines.
I'm not about to ditch my 9501LC. Though the new DLP unit is very good, it's not equal to the CRT projector in some ways that
are important to me. And, until such time as it's TRULY better in every way that matters to me, AND I can afford it, I will not
be looking to upgrade while my existing unit is reliable and continues to be in great shape as it is now, with virtually new CRTs with
under 400 hours on them.
CJ
CJ
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Spanky Ham
Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 5643 Location: Comedy Central
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
CJ,
That is cool. I should stop in on my next trip down to Miami and see this in action.
Scott said in the "Say it aint so" thread that the colors are really good on this pj. I know Alan over at AVS said the same thing, but I take his opinion with a grain of salt. It looks like you saw the same thing. I know from my experience the LEDs did look to impart a different look with what seemed like better colors. Anyway, did you grab one so you can experiment on it?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cmjohnson
Joined: 03 Apr 2006 Posts: 5180 Location: Buried under G90s
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I wish!
The red is every bit as much of an improvement in the depth and purity of red as it is when you add a color corrected C element to a 9500 that didn't have one.
The green...same deal.
Blue...as good as ever. CRT blue is really just about perfect anyway.
The mix colors (yellow, cyan, magenta) coming out of that unit look a little "off" because their color points are noticeably shifted.
But, since the PJ's color gamut is WIDER than that of the source media, it can be color corrected with a software correction map
to be dead on the original targets. You can't push a PJ to display colors OUT of its own native gamut, but you sure can rein one in
when its gamut is wider than the source.
I would say that if you used an LED-based projector like this, you would want to set it up in such a way that you can select the correct
color map for any given source. Running uncorrected full gamut colors with source material that was recorded in a narrower (legacy)
gamut will give slightly unnatural results.
CJ
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aarenlainey Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 10:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
FrontAnd Technology's featured LED lamps have extra-small footprints and extreme energy-efficiency. Sophiscated during circuit design for each lamp also bring the highest technology into your hand. In addition, thermal management patents are incorporated to deliver brightness and quality at the same time. These value-added benefits are sure to appeal to your environmentally conscious customers. They're also very cost-effective when compared to other makers' LED products --- helping to increase your bottom line.
To keep FrontAnd's selections up-to-date with the latest innovations in technology, our R&D team comes up with new IC designs each quarter. Every one of our products is RoHS compliant --- so importing to Europe is easy. FrontAnd Technology know that time can make or break a sale. That's why we deliver everything in just four weeks. For more information on our cutting-edge products.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WanMan
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 10270
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 12:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cmjohnson wrote: | | I would say that if you used an LED-based projector like this, you would want to set it up in such a way that you can select the correct color map for any given source. Running uncorrected full gamut colors with source material that was recorded in a narrower (legacy) gamut will give slightly unnatural results.CJ | And every boutique store will reflect this is their 'we don't care about anything in presentation and only about your money attitude'. Thus, the benefit to the perspective buyer is reduced and not fully realized.
_________________ Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WanMan
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 10270
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| aarenlainey wrote: | FrontAnd Technology's featured LED lamps have extra-small footprints and extreme energy-efficiency. Sophiscated during circuit design for each lamp also bring the highest technology into your hand. In addition, thermal management patents are incorporated to deliver brightness and quality at the same time. These value-added benefits are sure to appeal to your environmentally conscious customers. They're also very cost-effective when compared to other makers' LED products --- helping to increase your bottom line.
To keep FrontAnd's selections up-to-date with the latest innovations in technology, our R&D team comes up with new IC designs each quarter. Every one of our products is RoHS compliant --- so importing to Europe is easy. FrontAnd Technology know that time can make or break a sale. That's why we deliver everything in just four weeks. For more information on our cutting-edge products. |
Why does this seem like a market (ahem, Spam) post?
_________________ Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cmjohnson
Joined: 03 Apr 2006 Posts: 5180 Location: Buried under G90s
|
| Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 5:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
FrontAnd's products are not suitable for integration into projectors based on my quick review of their site.
They make LED lamps for automotive uses and for in-home lighting. Nothing that even comes close to competing with
Luminus Devices' Phlatlights or the high power modules from Lighting Sciences Corporation or other industry "luminaries"
such as Cree and Philips LumiLed and Luxeon brands.
I'd say our "guest" qualifies as a commercial spammer.
Incidentally, I'm working on developing some drop-in LED replacements for large venue DLP projectors. It'll require that the
lamp power supplies get modded or replaced as that 40KV start-up spike is probably bad for the LED module and the power delivery
is excessive anyway. I can get 7000 lumens out of 65 watts with LEDs, more than the 6000 lumens out of a 1200 watt UHP lamp.
I think this could be a nice niche market. Lifetime lamp replacement modules, lower power consumption, and maybe even greater
output than the original lamp.
I'm sure I'm not the only one toying with the idea.
CJ
CJ
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sparky015
Joined: 12 May 2009 Posts: 1185 Location: Cleveland / Akron, OH
|
| Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So how long do you think until the LED Pjs will be at a decent price ( ~$5K or less). 5-10 years? CJ, like you, I just put a lot of money and effort upgrading my 8500 to be a 9500LC. I'm hoping it will last me a number of years in the future. When the tubes are shot, I'm planning on changing technology, assuming someone doesn't have a blowout tube sale again.
_________________ ~Paul
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|