| Author |
Message |
AnalogRocks Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 26706 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
TV/Projector: Sony 1252Q, AMPRO 4000G
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 1:31 am Post subject: New 'old' Star Trek movie |
|
|
Just saw the comercial on Fox. Syler from hero's is playing spock. He looks the part too.
_________________ Tech support for nothing
CRT.
HD done right!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Green
Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Posts: 1394 Location: Calgary
TV/Projector: Marquee 9501LC / NEC 9PG+
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
The cast...
http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/MOV/011/casts/index.html
I want to see a better trailer than the sweaty guy welding teaser.
_________________ You can be young only once but, you can be immature forever.
Current Projector Marquee9501LC with PS3 (BLu-Ray) at 1080P LOVE IT! Screen is an Elunevision 120" 4:3 (2.4 gain - no hotspots). (also own a NEC 9PG+)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Green
Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Posts: 1394 Location: Calgary
TV/Projector: Marquee 9501LC / NEC 9PG+
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 1:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
I like that Chris Pine plays Kirk, when the first captain of the Enterprise was Chris Pike. I thought it was funny...
_________________ You can be young only once but, you can be immature forever.
Current Projector Marquee9501LC with PS3 (BLu-Ray) at 1080P LOVE IT! Screen is an Elunevision 120" 4:3 (2.4 gain - no hotspots). (also own a NEC 9PG+)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
draganm
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 8990 Location: Colorado
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 1:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Nero, who the heck is that?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Green
Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Posts: 1394 Location: Calgary
TV/Projector: Marquee 9501LC / NEC 9PG+
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 1:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nero is the Villain, which I believe is Romulan?
_________________ You can be young only once but, you can be immature forever.
Current Projector Marquee9501LC with PS3 (BLu-Ray) at 1080P LOVE IT! Screen is an Elunevision 120" 4:3 (2.4 gain - no hotspots). (also own a NEC 9PG+)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brooklyn
Joined: 17 Sep 2007 Posts: 494 Location: Morgan Hill, CA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
overclkr
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 4227
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
That is gonna be one KICK ASS movie.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WanMan
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 10270
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 10:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
As long as Paramount doesn't ask for a GM-like bailout it probably is a much desired change in scenery.
_________________ Trust no one. Absolutely no one. Advice of the board.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MikeEby
Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Posts: 5237 Location: Osceola, Indiana
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I did notice a continuity issue in Trailer 2. In the first shot the C2 (Corvette) has the top up…then it’s down in the rest of the sequence. Maybe it got blown off or something.
Still looks great...can't wait to see it!
Mike
_________________ Doing HD since the last century!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Person99
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 4899 Location: Flower Mound, TX
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, the sci-fi world has been abuzz about this for about 1 year. I for one am not holding my breath. JJ Abrams tends to start strong and finish weak which I don't seem to like much. I really like strong finishes it seems. Oh well, here's hoping!
_________________ Dave
A train station is where the train stops. A bus station is where the bus stops. On my desk, I have a work station....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecrabb Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 15909 Location: Utah
TV/Projector: JVC RS40, Epson 5010
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 6:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Funny - I noticed that right away, too Mike. I wonder of the discontinuity exists only in the trailer... For instance, in the film, he could have only just hopped in the car, stopped to put the top down and gas in, and then the chase scene ensues... But maybe you miss all that in the trailer.
Dave, the wife and I REALLY liked Lost on TV, so we had really high hopes for Cloverfield. I thought it was decent - scary as hell in some parts, actually. But, it almost would have been scarier without ever seeing the giant godzilla-like creature. The creatures in the subway were scary enough. You're right, though - weak finish. Being fans of Lost, we had high hopes for Fringe, what we thought would maybe be an X-Files-esque JJ Abrams show. Uhhhh... No. We didn't like the characters at all. Too bad, too because it could have been good stuff.
I agree - here's hoping.
SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MikeEby
Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Posts: 5237 Location: Osceola, Indiana
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ecrabb wrote: | Funny - I noticed that right away, too Mike. I wonder of the discontinuity exists only in the trailer... For instance, in the film, he could have only just hopped in the car, stopped to put the top down and gas in, and then the chase scene ensues... But maybe you miss all that in the trailer.
SC |
Knowing how the top works on a mid-year it's not a 5 second task putting the top down. It would not be easy to do while moving without doing serious damage to the car and the top that was not evident in the overhead shots. BTW the car is a 1965, if the rear emblem, gas tank door and hub caps are correct. For total nitpickers the rocker panel covers are not right for the year, damn 1080p! I did like the Iowa front plate which holds true to Kirk being from the state. </Geek off>
I just hope there is a disclaimer in the flick telling us there were no Corvettes harmed in the making of this picture.
Mike
_________________ Doing HD since the last century!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brooklyn
Joined: 17 Sep 2007 Posts: 494 Location: Morgan Hill, CA
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
As a trek fan, I am trying my best to keep my expectations reasonable. This franchise hasn't put out anything good in a long time.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|