|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Axatax
Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Posts: 403
TV/Projector: Sony VPH-G70Q (aka Barco Cine8 Onyx)
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would like to see an HD-SDI output on an ATSC/encrypted QAM tuner such as the Tivo Series3 or Sony DD250/500, both of which offer a source-direct mode. This will allow the signal to remain in the digital domain, and eliminate the long HDCP negotiation delays during resolution changes when changing channels. AFAIK, HD-SDI is the *ONLY* way to reach this goal.
Gary, do you think this would be possible.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gary M. Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Phil Smith wrote: | | Gary M. wrote: | | Phil Smith wrote: |
I thought we got past that, but I guess not. HD-SDI *IS* better in a commercial envioment, but NOT because of PQ. |
prove it , statements mean nothing without proof, I have offered contrary evidence to that yet you have offered nothing but HDMI = HD-SDI for PQ, hardly valid Phil especially coming from someone that has never seen it in action
are you having a senior moment? have you not read this entire thread of examples and technical reasons why HD-SDI gives better PQ? you have addressed none of them and my guess is that you will not
it would be nice if everyone lived in a fairy tale world like you do and they could go around and claim everything they think is better is definitively better while ignoring evidence and claims to something else superiority, you are so confident that you don't even address it
you have yet to address why some sources with HD-SDI and HDMI look better via HD-SDI (Samsung 1000 definitively and every other player released IMHO), you say get better sources, in that very comment you prove my entire point that I and others are making, yet you don't even realize it |
Lumagen says otherwise Gary. Sorry, I have no reason not to believe them.
As I get time, I'm going to educate myself on this subject, because admittedly, I don't know that much about it.
But in spite of that, I don't see where you guys make a convincing argument - at all! For one, that whole, "HD-SDI is commercial" argument that you guys are so fond of is ridiculous. It's stupid! How can you argue with anti-logic like that? You can't!
You guys are tiring ME out. I will come back to this gunfight better prepared to shoot down these unsubstantiated claims.  |
A) please show me where Lumagen thinks this and declared it
B) if they did how come the new Radiance has them
DVDO and Lumagen do not make commercial products, DVDO has had SDI thru their entire range of products
"HD-SDI is commercial and that is the arguement" was never mentioned by me, quit building a straw man so you can tear it down all in the process never attempting to answer my questions or refute technical aspects I have mentioned
this is getting really pathetic Phil, don't mention logic to me when straw men and genetic fallacies are flying everywhere
-Gary
Last edited by Gary M. on Sat Jul 12, 2008 9:45 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nashou66
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 16171 Location: West Seneca NY
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok Looking up some info on HDMi and SDi(HD) i came across and article about component vs HDMI And found this section interesting as it explains somewhat the benifits of SDI over HDMI having to do with Impendance and its effect on digital signals:
| Quote: | Analog component video is an extremely robust signal type; we have had our customers run analog component, without any need for boosters, relays or other special equipment, up to 200 feet without any signal quality issues at all. However, at long lengths, cable quality can be a consideration--in particular, impedance needs to be strictly controlled to a tight tolerance (ideally, 75 +/- 1.5 ohms) to prevent problems with signal reflection which can cause ghosting or ringing.
DVI and HDMI, unfortunately, are not so robust. The problem here is the same as the virtue of analog component: tight control over impedance. When the professional video industry went to digital signals, it settled upon a standard--SDI, serial digital video--which was designed to be run in coaxial cables, where impedance can be controlled very tightly, and consequently, uncompressed, full-blown HD signals can be run hundreds of feet with no loss of information in SDI. For reasons known only to the designers of the DVI and HDMI standards, this very sound design principle was ignored; instead of coaxial cable, the DVI and HDMI signals are run balanced, through twisted-pair cable. The best twisted pair cables control impedance to about +/- 10%. When a digital signal is run through a cable, the edges of the bits (represented by sudden transitions in voltage) round off, and the rounding increases dramatically with distance. Meanwhile, poor control over impedance results in signal reflections--portions of the signal bounce off of the display end of the line, propagate back down the cable, and return, interfering with later information in the same bitstream. At some point, the data become unrecoverable, and with no error correction available, there's no way to restore the lost information. |
The red is the most interesting..... where SDi and HD SDI have only a +/- of 1.5 ohm over the entire run of cable HDMI and DVI have a 10% which comes out to +/- 7.5 ohm difference and that 10% is only with "the best twisted pairs" I am sure most here do not spend $1000 on a high end HDMI cable which still perfoms less that a cheap coax according to this article. Sorry but for me this is proof enough for SDI superiority over DVI/HDMI, and this is only one benifit.
Full Article here: http://forum.ecoustics.com/bbs/messages/34579/122868.html
Athansios
_________________ Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher
"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan
One Smart Dog!!!
Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
Last edited by Nashou66 on Sat Jul 12, 2008 9:45 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gary M. Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Axatax wrote: | I would like to see an HD-SDI output on an ATSC/encrypted QAM tuner such as the Tivo Series3 or Sony DD250/500, both of which offer a source-direct mode. This will allow the signal to remain in the digital domain, and eliminate the long HDCP negotiation delays during resolution changes when changing channels. AFAIK, HD-SDI is the *ONLY* way to reach this goal.
Gary, do you think this would be possible. |
Tivo and Dish, Cable and etc. sources are something that HD-SDI guys are certainly looking into, sorry I can't give any better news
-Gary
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stefuel
Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 3353 Location: Green Harbor MA USA
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
I won't have any interest in HD SDI intil it's piped directly into the back of my projector.
_________________ Chip
A Barco is only a AmPro with training wheels
Card carrying member of the AVS chain gang.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nomadII
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 252
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Stefuel,
I agree that would be a best case scenario.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gary M. Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
that would be great, however it won't be of any use for a few reasons, the main one is that you must have a scaler of some kind to do processing and framerate conversions
that is unless someones makes a built in card with processing, framerate conversions and HD-SDI input, which will never happen, NEVER!!, it's called a scaler like DVDO or Lumagen or Crystalio, which can be set on top of a PJ (literally) with a 500+ feet HD-SDI lead from the gear and a 6 inch set of Belden 1694a RGBHV leads into the PJ
you can't use 1080p/24 via HD-SDI into a CRT, that is you wouldn't want to or want to watch it I should say, 1080i is a alternative but who uses simple 1920x1080i/30 anymore and furthermore this is not a direct pure 1080p/24 output like we want via HD-SDI, you could use 720p via HD-SDI but that is using simple scaling inside the video decoder in the player which is blah or sometimes simply bad and again is not pure 1080p/24 output, 1080p/60 via HD-SDI as we know is impossible in the players that we are modifying because of single link limitation to 1080p/24, 1080i or 720p
basically I see no practical usage that could come of it, if someone could show me how it would work then please by all means let me know
the fact that we want 1080p/24 from the HD-SDI output for a pure a output as possible means it must hit a processor of some kind if anything to do only simple framerate conversion to 48 or 72
1080p/24 4:2:2 HD-SDI is where it is at for BD/HD players
-Gary
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nashou66
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 16171 Location: West Seneca NY
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 2:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree the scaler would have to built into the card or pre set for one or two rez's, I asked Moome about this for a Marquee and he said it would cost way too much and he would need more room that is allowed on slot 2 ,and i suggested using the quad decoder slot but still said it be too difficult, no way for on screen menu unless it had a separate output for using on a comp monitor for initial set up.
Athanasios
_________________ Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher
"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan
One Smart Dog!!!
Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gino
Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 1363 Location: Trinity Beach, AUSTRALIA
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 2:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
I contacted Bob Zuch at Reference Imaging sometime ago to hear about their HD-SDI solution for their CinePro 9x. Basically it was an external powered box which took the HD-SDI signal and converted it to RGBHV. Wanted $4K for it at the time.
He said since SDI/HD-SDI is the broadcast standard it offers several advantages over the consumer electronics formats. This is a high quality, robust, unencrypted digital transmission format that will outperform all of the commonly used formats. An HD-SDI signal run to the projector is on a single coax cable that can be as long as 1000 feet without any signal degradation.
That doesn't really say anything new to this discussion though.
_________________ ( B ) ( G ) ( R ) Blendzilla Down Under ( R ) ( G ) ( B ) - Tubes of Fury
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gino
Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 1363 Location: Trinity Beach, AUSTRALIA
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Phil, instead of arguing about the capabilities of HDMI vs HD-SDI, perhaps you should look at the fact that a HD-SDI mod takes the information direct from the disc, giving the purest signal, rather than HDMI taking it from a decoder which has messed about with the signal. This could explain the differences Gary and Alan report with with better colour gradations and less edge enhancement.
My example with Caspers mod and the poorly implemented Broadcom decoder chip shows that manufacturers try and do things to the signal before sending it out over HDMI.
_________________ ( B ) ( G ) ( R ) Blendzilla Down Under ( R ) ( G ) ( B ) - Tubes of Fury
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gary M. Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Gino wrote: |
My example with Caspers mod and the poorly implemented Broadcom decoder chip shows that manufacturers try and do things to the signal before sending it out over HDMI. |
exactly Gino, sheesh
so Gino whay HD-SDI gear do you have? what do you think of it personally? love to hear from you and I think everyone reading this thread would as well , your opinion is much appreciated around these parts
-Gary
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dochlywd
Joined: 25 Apr 2006 Posts: 346 Location: Saint Louis, Missouri
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 4:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think the main thing that would keep me from going this route is the price. I do have one of Gary's SDI-modded Panny RP91's and I love it. But, when you drop $400 on a PS3 and then need to invest another $900 to get the SDI mod performed, that puts it in the arena of a small majority. Now, that's nothing for someone like Art or Gino, but for us DIYers, it's a little rich for our blood. I mean hell, a Gary SDI-Modded PS3 is probably cheaper than JUST ONE of the binding posts on Gino's custom built speakers!!!
If not for the price, I would be all for it. It would also allow me another connection to my Lumagen HDP. Right now I have my HD-Direct TV and XA2 taking up two of the inputs and I would have to add a switcher of some sort to connect the PS3. SDI not only gives a great, clean feed to the Lumagen but it also allows me to use the second SDI input next to the Panny RP91s with no switcher.
Any coupons floating around Gary?!
Doc
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gary M. Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 5:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
hey doc, haven't talked to you in forever dude
I must be careful discussing such things on Curt's forum, I am not allowed to discuss sales or make ad's here, I have to respect Curt's wishes and that included originally banning me (and all sales) for some parts I owed him that never made it to him, I have signed up again and am talking a little and don't want to get banned again
Doc, the first thing I must tell you is that the Lumagen scaler is not HD-SDI capable, it can only accept 480i/576i SD-SDI signals, you would need a totally different scaler to even try HD-SDI, the new Radiance doesn't even contain HD-SDI inputs or SD-SDI ones for that matter, a stupid decision IMHO, there is a Radiance pro that is coming that will have dual HD-SDI inputs, 5500$ MSRP I think, again IMHO overpriced badly
I am glad to hear you are still enjoying that RP91, I still love those guys, what a classic
BTW, Lumagen partnered with Sencore, I wonder what the later thinks of HD-SDI?
-Gary
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Welwynnick
Joined: 04 May 2006 Posts: 229 Location: Welwyn, Herts, UK
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mad Mr H uses a Gefen HD SDI to DVI convertor. The box is only 8" x 7" x 1.75" and sits on top of the projector with a short cable to an HMDI input card. The scaler uses Gennum VXP processing to generate 1080p60 from 1080p24 or 1080i60 inputs from a single SDI coax cable, and you hardly know its there. It performs as well or better than anything I've seen and is reasonably priced. There are two IR-remote controlled inputs, and it accepts SD SDI as well. I think it's an obvious solution for someone who wants to use HD SDI.
I do wish HD SDI had become the domestic video standard, but have to accept that HDMI is what we got. Blu-ray players are still developing, and there's a bit of functionality to go before they stabilise. HD SDI modifications are difficult and expensive, and anyone that jumps into HD SDI now, may want another player with say profile 2.0 and DTS MA decoding in a year's time. So the conversion may not be very future-proof.
There also seem to be issues with the modification. If the mod is incorporated at the HDMI driver, as I hear some of them are, then the raison d'etre of SDI is lost. Because of the very high bit-rate/bandwidth, the conversions are not as robust as SD SDI either, and there isn't the same level of assurance that they will work properly. HDMI is the spawn of Satan in my book, but it is the devil you know...
regards, Nick
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nashou66
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 16171 Location: West Seneca NY
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Nashou66 wrote: | I agree the scaler would have to built into the card or pre set for one or two rez's, I asked Moome about this for a Marquee and he said it would cost way too much and he would need more room that is allowed on slot 2 ,and i suggested using the quad decoder slot but still said it be too difficult, no way for on screen menu unless it had a separate output for using on a comp monitor for initial set up.
Athanasios |
I found an Input card that had the capability of SD SDI from MoonJong, he doesnt make them anymore but it had a built in scaler, it be cool if he'd be willing to get back into the marquee input card business. I wonder if we found some of these cards and added the HD SDI chip to it, it has a place for a chip waiting to be populated.
Athanasios
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
89.48 KB |
| Viewed: |
15060 Time(s) |

|
_________________ Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher
"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan
One Smart Dog!!!
Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gary M. Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Welwynnick wrote: |
There also seem to be issues with the modification. If the mod is incorporated at the HDMI driver, as I hear some of them are, then the raison d'etre of SDI is lost. |
Nick, please give some more info or explanation on this if possible
-Gary
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nomadII
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 252
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Any input would need to be 424M. Sorry for the confusion.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Welwynnick
Joined: 04 May 2006 Posts: 229 Location: Welwyn, Herts, UK
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Gary M. wrote: | | Welwynnick wrote: | | There also seem to be issues with the modification. If the mod is incorporated at the HDMI driver, as I hear some of them are, then the raison d'etre of SDI is lost. | Nick, please give some more info or explanation on this if possible -Gary |
I didn't want to say too much about this, but I reliably understand that the well-known Dutch HD SDI conversion of the Sony BDP-S1 takes the data from the HDMI driver, rather than from the decoder, which is usual for SDI. I'm pretty convinced abouts the benefits of SDI & HD SDI, but not with this sort of implementation, which doesn't offer the advantages that it ought. People who buy the mod may not know about this, and will probably be wasting a lot of their money. Of course, given the scale and nature of the modding operation, it could be that the process has improved since then, but I still think it's a case of buyer beware.
Nick
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fireanimal
Joined: 17 Jul 2007 Posts: 231 Location: Stayner, ON
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here is the MoonJong card with SDI
| Nashou66 wrote: | | Nashou66 wrote: | I agree the scaler would have to built into the card or pre set for one or two rez's, I asked Moome about this for a Marquee and he said it would cost way too much and he would need more room that is allowed on slot 2 ,and i suggested using the quad decoder slot but still said it be too difficult, no way for on screen menu unless it had a separate output for using on a comp monitor for initial set up.
Athanasios |
I found an Input card that had the capability of SD SDI from MoonJong, he doesnt make them anymore but it had a built in scaler, it be cool if he'd be willing to get back into the marquee input card business. I wonder if we found some of these cards and added the HD SDI chip to it, it has a place for a chip waiting to be populated.
Athanasios | [/url]
_________________ My Movie Collection
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nashou66
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 16171 Location: West Seneca NY
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| fireanimal wrote: | Here is the MoonJong card with SDI
| Nashou66 wrote: | | Nashou66 wrote: | I agree the scaler would have to built into the card or pre set for one or two rez's, I asked Moome about this for a Marquee and he said it would cost way too much and he would need more room that is allowed on slot 2 ,and i suggested using the quad decoder slot but still said it be too difficult, no way for on screen menu unless it had a separate output for using on a comp monitor for initial set up.
Athanasios |
I found an Input card that had the capability of SD SDI from MoonJong, he doesnt make them anymore but it had a built in scaler, it be cool if he'd be willing to get back into the marquee input card business. I wonder if we found some of these cards and added the HD SDI chip to it, it has a place for a chip waiting to be populated.
Athanasios | [/url] |
Nice do you have one or ever use one?
Athanasios
_________________ Don't blame your underwear for your crooked ass~ unknown Greek philosopher
"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April 15." --- President Reagan
One Smart Dog!!!
Marquee High Performance Bellows now shipping!!
Marquee Modifications and Performance Enhancement
Marquee C-element and Bellow removal
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|