|
As this forum is rarely used anymore, we've locked it. Feel free to browse and read. Questions? Please reach out to us directly. Cheers! |
|
|
 |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
stefuel
Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 3353 Location: Green Harbor MA USA
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
OK, lets for a minute say I'm going to "buy" into this arguement. The current mentality around here is if you don't have the best then you got $hit so I'll have to drop almost 5K for a VPS3800 to hang with the "big dogs". Now lets put a real world figure on the percentage of increase of image quality I should expect from that coin drop. You'll hear all kinds of descriptions like "night and day", "100% better" even wild $hit like "1,000%" better, when in reality we've only achieved a mid single numbers increase. That's a lot of coin to drop for such a small gain.
But hey, if you've got deep pockets and it's worth it to you then go for it. It's good for someones economy
I'll be back. I have to go and raise my speaker wires another 5/8ths off the floor.
_________________ Chip
A Barco is only a AmPro with training wheels
Card carrying member of the AVS chain gang.
Last edited by stefuel on Sun Jun 15, 2008 11:44 am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
perisoft
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 2920 Location: Ithaca, NY
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
How can *anything* help with primaries on either a digital or CRT? You can't make pure red any more accurate on either; what comes out of the tube or through the filter is what it is. You can't adjust it. What gives?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
r.bauer
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 280 Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Check out the VP50pro, you can get refurbs for something like $960. Perhaps that puts it in a different perspective.
But let me try to give a score to the advantages of a modern scaler on a 1 to 10 scale on a 9"CRT,where 10 is the best and a 5,5 or higher is sufficient:
- Display film based material at 48 or 72hz; Score: 7,5
Eliminating Judder is most visible during pans or other camera movement. Some movements turn out so much more smooth than others. The result differs with the amount of speed of the original movement. At some speeds the improvement is huge, at other speeds the improvement can be close to none.
- De-interlace set-top box. Score: 8
The improvements are different for 50hz native viewers (EU) and 60hz native viewers (US). First 50hz viewers. Although 1080i@50hz can be done, an interlaced signal at this low refresh-rate has a lot of flicker in it. The 'writing speed' of the electron-beam is simply to low to excite the phosphor enough across the entire surface. It is simply to low for the type of phosphor used in CRT-projectors. Also on very sharp projectors the scanlines can become very annoying. Especially with vertical camera movements close to a certain speed the scanlines cannot be missed and the resolution of the perceived image drops.
For 60hz viewers the flicker is not so apparent, as the refresh-rate is a little above the lowest acceptable refresh-rate for CRT-projectors (using interlaced signals). The visibility of scanlines is of the same significance as with 50hz viewers.
For both the EU and US viewers the increase in lightoutput is apparent when comparing an interlaced and a progressive signal on a CRT.
- Analog input de-interlacing and scaling SD-material to 2* native resolution: 10
But when looking at SD-TV or DVD, or even LaserDisc, fed native from a player, this is something that cannot be compared to anything else. Forget D-scaler with a video-input-card or a HOLO-I or HOLO-II. The noise floor on analog inputs of a modern scaler is so low, it is insane. Especially in this respect there is no real comparison possible. The list of options and features on the Crystalio-II to process this signal are almost a page long. And the result is nothing short of stunning.
- Digital input de-interlacing and scaling SD-material to 2* native resolution: 7
(Compared to a Toshiba HD-DVD or PS3)
You gain the option of scaling to a twice the native resolution (optimum spatial scaling) and gain the option to display film-based material at 48 or 72hz.
When viewing TV-based material, you get the the best possible motion-adaptive deinterlacing possible. It clearly outperforms an HTPC in this respect. Scalers are built with one purpose, and that is to handle video material, and pc's are not.
Tweak-ability. Score: 10.
A scaler allows you to make adjustments to each source individually. From basic adjustments such as Contrast and Brightness, to grayscale or gamma corrections for each individual color. This ease of use can not be achieved with external basic-gamma control boxes.
First you calibrate from the scaler, and then each source as required.
The strong point of a CRT-projector is, that even with less than perfect sources, it still looks tunning. The image produced by any CRT projector automatically looks natural to the eye. Nothing will ever change that. But beyond this, there is still room for improvement, but at a cost, and that is where it becomes personal.
Last edited by r.bauer on Sun Jun 15, 2008 12:07 pm; edited 2 times in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
r.bauer
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 280 Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| perisoft wrote: | | How can *anything* help with primaries on either a digital or CRT? You can't make pure red any more accurate on either; what comes out of the tube or through the filter is what it is. You can't adjust it. What gives? |
You can only adjust oversaturated primaries. Undersaturated primaries, such as an unfiltered CRT projector cannot be adjusted.
Most digital projector are oversaturated. Fixed digital displays, such as LCD's and plasma's are getting better and better though.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stefuel
Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 3353 Location: Green Harbor MA USA
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Your 1-10 scale still has not put a final figure on how much better the end result is
I'm not buying into it. We're still just keeping up with the Jonses. If we just look at the two aformentioned scalers (Crystalio II and VP series scalers) look at how many revisions they have come out with in just the past couple of years. Every time someone in their R&D dept farts we have to cough up another couple of G's to stay on top of things. If you've bought into DVDO's or Crystalio's progression from the start, how much will you have spent to drag out that last couple of percent increase in image quality.
Food for thought. The average person on this forum enjoys a image that's better than 98% of the people you will ever meet on the street in you life. Why are we not satisfied with that. Because it's time to keep up with the Art's
_________________ Chip
A Barco is only a AmPro with training wheels
Card carrying member of the AVS chain gang.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AFryia
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 965 Location: S.E. Michigan VPH-G70Q
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| r.bauer wrote: |
- Digital input de-interlacing and scaling SD-material to 2* native resolution: 7
(Compared to a Toshiba HD-DVD or PS3)
You gain the option of scaling to a twice the native resolution (optimum spatial scaling) and gain the option to display film-based material at 48 or 72hz.
When viewing TV-based material, you get the the best possible motion-adaptive deinterlacing possible. It clearly outperforms an HTPC in this respect. Scalers are built with one purpose, and that is to handle video material, and pc's are not.
|
I can buy into this. I've never been happy with the SD-TV scaling and conversion on my HTPC. I would be curious to see what a high end scaler can do with the same crappy cable signal.
| r.bauer wrote: |
Tweak-ability. Score: 10.
A scaler allows you to make adjustments to each source individually. From basic adjustments such as Contrast and Brightness, to grayscale or gamma corrections for each individual color. This ease of use can not be achieved with external basic-gamma control boxes.
First you calibrate from the scaler, and then each source as required.
|
For multiple sources I can see a convince factor and ease of use. I don't know about the 10 score. If I had the time I could get crazy stupid tweaking resolution, V refresh, H refresh, porch, gamma, on my HTPC.
Back to the original post. I scale DVD and watch OTA HD native. I don't have BR yet but If I did I'd probably watch that native also.
I think the original poster is referring to the "scale of diminishing return", no pun intended.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phil Smith
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 7717
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| r.bauer wrote: | | Many people say that an 8" LC projector 'is just fine' at 1080i. While it is fine at 1080i, it really shines at 1080p in my opinion. All good 8" CRT's will do 1080p whithout a problem. The spatial resolution of 1080i and 1080p are the same, so if 1080i goes, 1080p also goes, and progressive just looks so much better, it is just more easy on the eye. |
To each his own of coarse, but I think there are more 8" LC PJ owners that will disagree than agree with that statement.
| r.bauer wrote: | | A PS3 (at 60hz!) will not display the entire picture, the left and right side are 'wrapped around' the ends of the image line, so you miss something of the picture. |
I don't understand why some of you are having this problem. I believe the PS3 outputs the standard HDTV resolution.
| r.bauer wrote: | | But with CRT's it is different. I like them because of the picture quality they give me. Spot on primaries, perfect black level... |
Please explain why these are deficiencies to begin with and what a scaler does to fix them?
| r.bauer wrote: | But let me try to give a score to the advantages of a modern scaler on a 1 to 10 scale on a 9"CRT,where 10 is the best and a 5,5 or higher is sufficient: | stefuel wrote: | Your 1-10 scale still has not put a final figure on how much better the end result is  |
|
No it doesn't. You say a scaler rates 7.5 for a certain aspect (for example). Well maybe it rated 7.25 without the scaler. Your scale gives no indication of the amount of improvement.
| AFryia wrote: | | I can buy into this. I've never been happy with the SD-TV scaling and conversion on my HTPC. I would be curious to see what a high end scaler can do with the same crappy cable signal. |
You're kinda missing the point of this thread. It's not about upscaling SD sources. Because all sources are becoming HD, there's no longer a need for scaling. The resolution of your source material and your PJ are becoming one and the same.
| AFryia wrote: | | For multiple sources I can see a convince factor and ease of use. I don't know about the 10 score. If I had the time I could get crazy stupid tweaking resolution, V refresh, H refresh, porch, gamma, on my HTPC. |
As I mentioned, all my sources output identical HDTV standard 1080i signals. There's no multiple signals to handle. They're all the same.
It may be different overseas. You may have more issues to deal with. But for my setup in the US, the ONLY benefit I would get from a scaler is a higher refresh rate. That is a good benefit, but buy a scaler for just that? I wouldn't.
Last edited by Phil Smith on Sun Jun 15, 2008 5:12 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GEBrown
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 729 Location: Denver
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| perisoft wrote: | | How can *anything* help with primaries on either a digital or CRT? You can't make pure red any more accurate on either; what comes out of the tube or through the filter is what it is. You can't adjust it. What gives? |
I'm pretty sure that the newest firmware on the Lumagen HDP and HDQ allow you to adjust the primaries to CIE standard - but Person99 (Dave) would know for sure.
_________________ Member of the Marquee Maniacs Club
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stefuel
Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 3353 Location: Green Harbor MA USA
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"but Person99 (Dave) would know for sure. "
Of course he would.
_________________ Chip
A Barco is only a AmPro with training wheels
Card carrying member of the AVS chain gang.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
r.bauer
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 280 Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Phil Smith wrote: | | r.bauer wrote: | | Many people say that an 8" LC projector 'is just fine' at 1080i. While it is fine at 1080i, it really shines at 1080p in my opinion. All good 8" CRT's will do 1080p whithout a problem. The spatial resolution of 1080i and 1080p are the same, so if 1080i goes, 1080p also goes, and progressive just looks so much better, it is just more easy on the eye. |
To each his own of coarse, but I think there are more 8" LC PJ owners that will disagree than agree with that statement. |
The 8" CRT's I have setup, such as the G70 and BG808s do 1080p very well. But this is my opinion, others may have different opinions.
| Phil Smith wrote: | | r.bauer wrote: | | A PS3 (at 60hz!) will not display the entire picture, the left and right side are 'wrapped around' the ends of the image line, so you miss something of the picture. |
I don't understand why some of you are having this problem. I believe the PS3 outputs the standard HDTV resolution. |
This may be related to the european PS3's having different timings than the US PS3's. The problem varies from projector to projector. The G70 displayed all of the picture and the BG1209s didn't. Please test it with a BD testpattern (Available on every BD title released by Sony: press 7669 in the disc's menu.) and report back.
| Phil Smith wrote: | | r.bauer wrote: | | But with CRT's it is different. I like them because of the picture quality they give me. Spot on primaries, perfect black level... |
Please explain why these are deficiencies to begin with and what a scaler does to fix them? |
CRT's are so good by nature / by design, that they still can keep up with current developments, such as modern scalers. They are still able to show improvement, after being ten years old.
| Phil Smith wrote: | | r.bauer wrote: | But let me try to give a score to the advantages of a modern scaler on a 1 to 10 scale on a 9"CRT,where 10 is the best and a 5,5 or higher is sufficient: | stefuel wrote: | Your 1-10 scale still has not put a final figure on how much better the end result is  |
|
No it doesn't. You say a scaler rates 7.5 for a certain aspect (for example). Well maybe it rated 7.25 without the scaler. Your scale gives no indication of the amount of improvement. |
The scale has 5.5 or more as sufficient. The HD-DVD player and the PS3 rate a 5.5 on each scale.
| Phil Smith wrote: | | AFryia wrote: | | For multiple sources I can see a convince factor and ease of use. I don't know about the 10 score. If I had the time I could get crazy stupid tweaking resolution, V refresh, H refresh, porch, gamma, on my HTPC. |
As I mentioned, all my sources output identical HDTV standard 1080i signals. There's no multiple signals to handle. They're all the same. |
If this is not a valid point for you, it makes your checklist that much shorter.
| Phil Smith wrote: | | It may be different overseas. You may have more issues to deal with. But for my setup in the US, the ONLY benefit I would get from a scaler is a higher refresh rate. That is a good benefit, but buy a scaler for just that? I wouldn't. |
Ofcourse there is a point of diminishing returns. The biggest improvement possible is accomplished by having a CRT to begin with. Then come other things into play, such as a proper setup, filtering, calibration, good sources and if you have a reason for one, a scaler.
But the OP starts "With everything now being displayed natively,...". Please explain native to me, because HD movies on HD-DVD or PS3 cannot be displayed natively by a CRT! On the disc, HD movies are stored in the 1080p24 format. So something must be done before a CRT-projector can display it at all. If you have a choice between 48, 60 and 72hz, what would be your first choice with 24p source material?
Almost the same goes for 1080i source material from your set-top box. While that can be displayed natively with a CRT, improvement can be made by proper de-interlacing. (As far as there is such a thing as proper de-interlacing, but that is a whole different discussion....)
Please try to visit a HomeTheather that uses a scaler together with a CRT and see for yourself.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gary M. Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't understand how a scaler or demanding the utmost videophile performance is keeping up with the Jones family? I don't give a f*ck about what Mr. Jones does next door, I want my setup to be the best possible and I don't mean adding G90's to replace my NEC 1352LC
the simple fact is that without a scaler one is sacrificing the delivery of as close to perfect possible calibrated image in their HT, I didn't get into this or have a passion for videophile to impress people or have a image look better than 98% of normal TV viewing
there are so many things that a scaler does for ones image, bringing the discussion of cost into it is pointless, they are simply priceless,
to say they are sales gimmicks or are keeping up with the Jones products is foolish, by that measure having a CRT projector and not 50" LCD is trying to out due the Jones'
-Gary
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stefuel
Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 3353 Location: Green Harbor MA USA
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OK so native may not have been the best choice of words but I think you know what I was getting at. I can tell you that I could visit a dozen Crystalio/DVDO VP 50 equiped theaters and I still won't buy one. I just don't see tha 3-4K in value over what I already have. I haven't checked it for a while but I can tell you that I can get a almost perfect grayscale on the 4600HD (way better than the eyes ability to detect it) so that leaves the less than perfect pans from 60Hz that I have to really look for to see. 3-4K to resolve that doesn't sound like a cost effective expense
PS Have I pissed enough people off today? Happy Fathers Day
_________________ Chip
A Barco is only a AmPro with training wheels
Card carrying member of the AVS chain gang.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gary M. Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
and yes Lumagen added primary calibration to the pre-radiance HDP and HDQ units
and yes they will correct pretty much any primary problems you have
-Gary
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phil Smith
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 7717
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 10:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Luckily I own a G70. Primaries are almost spot on, so no adjustment needed. I guess it's different for XGs. Not that a scaler can help that much anyway:
| r.bauer wrote: | | perisoft wrote: | | How can *anything* help with primaries on either a digital or CRT? You can't make pure red any more accurate on either; what comes out of the tube or through the filter is what it is. You can't adjust it. What gives? |
You can only adjust oversaturated primaries. Undersaturated primaries, such as an unfiltered CRT projector cannot be adjusted.
Most digital projector are oversaturated. Fixed digital displays, such as LCD's and plasma's are getting better and better though. |
It really seems to boil down to this: If you have a good CRT PJ, no scaler is needed. For everyone else, instead of buying an expensive scaler, maybe you should take that money and buy a better PJ.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stefuel
Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 3353 Location: Green Harbor MA USA
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gary M. wrote: | I don't understand how a scaler or demanding the utmost videophile performance is keeping up with the Jones family? I don't give a f*ck about what Mr. Jones does next door, I want my setup to be the best possible and I don't mean adding G90's to replace my NEC 1352LC
the simple fact is that without a scaler one is sacrificing the delivery of as close to perfect possible calibrated image in their HT, I didn't get into this or have a passion for videophile to impress people or have a image look better than 98% of normal TV viewing
there are so many things that a scaler does for ones image, bringing the discussion of cost into it is pointless, they are simply priceless,
to say they are sales gimmicks or are keeping up with the Jones products is foolish, by that measure having a CRT projector and not 50" LCD is trying to out due the Jones'
-Gary |
Gary, you're obviously getting a hair across your a$$ over this. but you are claiming videoplile status and in the same sentance you say you want the best and without so much as a comma reject the idea of upgrading to a G-90. If you are so hell-bent on perfection and cost is pointless, why not a G-90 or two and a full blown Terranex?
I never said they were "gimmicks" but I refuse to follow their upgrade path to the poor house.
A good correctly installed projector and screen, a couple of HD sources of choice, a decent HDMI 1.3 AVR, HD-Fury, Box1020 and most normal people would be in heaven.
_________________ Chip
A Barco is only a AmPro with training wheels
Card carrying member of the AVS chain gang.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gary M. Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 1:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| stefuel wrote: | | Gary M. wrote: | I don't understand how a scaler or demanding the utmost videophile performance is keeping up with the Jones family? I don't give a f*ck about what Mr. Jones does next door, I want my setup to be the best possible and I don't mean adding G90's to replace my NEC 1352LC
the simple fact is that without a scaler one is sacrificing the delivery of as close to perfect possible calibrated image in their HT, I didn't get into this or have a passion for videophile to impress people or have a image look better than 98% of normal TV viewing
there are so many things that a scaler does for ones image, bringing the discussion of cost into it is pointless, they are simply priceless,
to say they are sales gimmicks or are keeping up with the Jones products is foolish, by that measure having a CRT projector and not 50" LCD is trying to out due the Jones'
-Gary |
Gary, you're obviously getting a hair across your a$$ over this. but you are claiming videoplile status and in the same sentance you say you want the best and without so much as a comma reject the idea of upgrading to a G-90. If you are so hell-bent on perfection and cost is pointless, why not a G-90 or two and a full blown Terranex?
I never said they were "gimmicks" but I refuse to follow their upgrade path to the poor house.
A good correctly installed projector and screen, a couple of HD sources of choice, a decent HDMI 1.3 AVR, HD-Fury, Box1020 and most normal people would be in heaven.  |
no hairs crossed
your thread was titled "is a scaler a thing of the past"
because a person doesn't want to get one and upgrade to the poor house as you said doesn't = a valid argument, because they seem wasteful to you or you don't want to spend the money on them doesn't mean they aren't useful in a huge manner nor that they don't get one closer to that perfectly calibrated image
my take is that you get a system in place that is the best you can get, then possibly upgrade your CRT, I would love to do that down the road, but it is not a priority nor is it keeping me from videophile quality PQ right now, the scaler would be though
a fine example that is only a drop in the bucket:
a simple question for those that don't have a scaler, how do you correct for Y/C delays inherent in each source and long signal chains? you don't, a Y/C delay kills a image quicker than just about anything IMHO, every device ever made by a man has them, some horrid(like Dish Network HD receivers) some not so bad (like my Panny BD30 BD player), with a scaler you can correct Y/C delays down to sub pixel accuracy, a perfect y/c setting results in a sharper cleaner image without color fringing and smearing
another example:
a classic trick of calibrators is to turn down the brightness of the CRT unit and then compensate by bumping up the brightness at the source, not all sources allow this, and in some cases when activating picture controls on sources they fubar everything, a scaler allows you to do this perfectly for each source, I have my 1352LC brightness in the mid 30's and my VP50pro cranked up alot, this results in much cleaner, blacker and more defined blacks, really easy to see when comparing back and fourth
I would rather have my NEC 1352LC and the VP50pro than a G90 and no scaler any day of the week, no question about it
-Gary
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nomadII
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 252
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 6:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually the revolution in affordable video processing is why this forum exist & why we all own this "dinosaur" CRT technology.
I used to crave a Faroudja 5000 or a Teranex as the zenith of video performance. However I made no advancement towards ownership until utilization of a CRT was much more affordable.
Ofcourse it is no longer a necessity, but once you have spent "x" amount of dollars it is silly not to get the best performance out of whichever display you own.
"X" is a very different figure for each person at this forum.
I am always reminded of the HD source revoulution a few years back when people so happy with their current CRT setups opined that an HD source could not possibly make any improvement from the excellent performance they already had. Do not hear much from that crowd any more.
Last edited by nomadII on Mon Jun 16, 2008 9:03 am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AnalogRocks Forum Moderator
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 26706 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
TV/Projector: Sony 1252Q, AMPRO 4000G
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 6:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| nomadII wrote: | .
I am always reminded of the people so happy with their current CRT setups that an HD source could not possibly make a difference from the excellent performance they already had. Do not hear much from that crowd any more. |
That reminds me of a famous billionair quiping "Who could possibly need more than 640k of ram?"
For most, once they see the HD signal they can't go back. I did, but then again I'm not most people.
_________________ Tech support for nothing
CRT.
HD done right!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Axatax
Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Posts: 403
TV/Projector: Sony VPH-G70Q (aka Barco Cine8 Onyx)
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | It really seems to boil down to this: If you have a good CRT PJ, no scaler is needed. For everyone else, instead of buying an expensive scaler, maybe you should take that money and buy a better PJ. |
I think we have the same PJ. I also use a scaler. Just so I understand, if I were to remove the scaler from my setup today, I would loose nothing? How have you come to this conclusion?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MikeEby
Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Posts: 5237 Location: Osceola, Indiana
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| AnalogRocks wrote: |
For most, once they see the HD signal they can't go back. I did, but then again I'm not most people. |
I haven't watched an SD-DVD for over a year, they just look like sh*t....Why bother, I called DVD a dying format at work the other day, geez did I get some weird looks.
Mike
_________________ Doing HD since the last century!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Forum powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
|
|